1971 Cutlass A/C System
#1
1971 Cutlass A/C System
My car still has the original R12 system & it was serviced a few years ago by the prior owner. It cooled last year but not too well. I've read where these 1971 cars did not have a cycling compressor. Correct? Will my compressor shut down if the freon level gets too low however to prevent damage to the system? I've worked w/ my 1988 Mark VII A/C system, & it cycled when low & even when cooling. I have the factory service manual, but want to be certain it won't wreck itself.
#3
GM hadn't completely figured out CC systems at that time, so no, a 71 doesn't have a cycling clutch.
Some GM systems did have a low refrigerant pressure/superheat switch but I don't recall early 70s A-bodies having it. Cadillacs had it in the 60s and the other full-size GM cars got it in early 70s. Some carlines kept it even after the R4 compressors appeared.
If your car has one of these clipped onto the compressor bracket it has the low pressure protection switch. This is on a 1976 Ninety Eight with VIR system (contains all valves in one vessel).
Some GM systems did have a low refrigerant pressure/superheat switch but I don't recall early 70s A-bodies having it. Cadillacs had it in the 60s and the other full-size GM cars got it in early 70s. Some carlines kept it even after the R4 compressors appeared.
If your car has one of these clipped onto the compressor bracket it has the low pressure protection switch. This is on a 1976 Ninety Eight with VIR system (contains all valves in one vessel).
Last edited by rocketraider; February 24th, 2023 at 08:34 AM.
#4
During my research I discovered the compressor is designed to spray a small amount of oil at the pulley. I just installed a nice white radiator overflow container in my 1971 Cutlass 350. So, I made a small plastic guard for that pulley. Hardly noticed when you look at the engine. Bracket attached where the muffler mounts. Material is a 1 gallon shrubbery pot from the local nursery.
Last edited by Falkon; March 1st, 2023 at 01:23 PM.
#5
Where did you get that research information about the oil spray?
If you compressor is spraying oil from the front pully area the front seal is bad. Think about this, why would the design engineers want oil around the clutch or the belts.
If in fact you see oil you have a Freon/oil leak. This could be why you are experiencing degraded cooling performance.
If you compressor is spraying oil from the front pully area the front seal is bad. Think about this, why would the design engineers want oil around the clutch or the belts.
If in fact you see oil you have a Freon/oil leak. This could be why you are experiencing degraded cooling performance.
#6
Where did you get that research information about the oil spray?
If you compressor is spraying oil from the front pully area the front seal is bad. Think about this, why would the design engineers want oil around the clutch or the belts.
If in fact you see oil you have a Freon/oil leak. This could be why you are experiencing degraded cooling performance.
If you compressor is spraying oil from the front pully area the front seal is bad. Think about this, why would the design engineers want oil around the clutch or the belts.
If in fact you see oil you have a Freon/oil leak. This could be why you are experiencing degraded cooling performance.
sticky black residue - ClassicOldsmobile.com
Last edited by Falkon; March 2nd, 2023 at 09:59 AM.
#8
Last edited by Falkon; March 2nd, 2023 at 10:15 AM.
#9
Buick engine have a shield like that from the factory. As for the designed leak, you have to keep in mind the time period the A6 compressor was designed. Like most things made back then, it was way overkill, extremely rugged, and did the job extremely well. The refrigerant was cheap, in one of my A/C classes the instructor told us that they used the refrigerant to blow clean the condenser coils on houses because it was easier that dragging a air compressor around. Nobody knew what the ozone layer was, nobody worried about the tiny leak. As long as the A/C kept you cool nobody worried about that stuff.
#10
Thank you for the explanation of this system. My plans are not to use the car very much. The A/C would be used even less. It was serviced two years ago by the prior owner, & a hose was replaced. I plan to have it converted to R134 in the future, & it'll probably get a new compressor. At present I'll use it as is until it stops cooling.
Last edited by Falkon; March 2nd, 2023 at 05:34 PM.
#12
Thank you for the explanation of this system. My plans are not to use the car very much. The A/C would be used even less. It was serviced two years ago by the prior owner, & a hose was replaced. I plan to have it converted to R134 in the future, & it'll probably get a new compressor. At present I'll use it as is until it stops cooling.
Air still blows cold when I need it. No regrets.
#14
Yup. AC systems back then were designed to lose a pound or so of refrigerant in a year's time. It was considered normal. Then the car-hating guilt-ridden neeners made it their mission to make comfortable, conditioned air something bad. Never mind it was a godsend for people with respiratory problems.
You'll never convince me that a combination of car-haters and Big Chemical didn't conspire to eliminate effective automotive refrigerants. The patents (ergo royalties) on R12 were expiring, one of the major players in chemicals had developed R134a but couldn't get anyone interested in it, so get the enviro-fascists in on it and invent an ozone layer catastrophe. The ozone layer hole has existed for millennia and has expanded and contracted with conditions. But guilt-ridden neeners just can't help themselves.
I don't get people who carry irrational guilt over things they weren't involved with and had no control over. I just don't.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post