1968 400 2 barrel (Turnpike?)
#1
1968 400 2 barrel (Turnpike?)
I picked up this core engine yesterday. It is a G block - engine stamp appears to be 38m344066. C heads, although it has the 2 barrel turnpike cruiser intake on it. This came out of a wrecking yard and was sitting in a '65 Starfire car. The intake dates to a 68 as well. My question and perhaps its unanswerable - I read on 442.com that there were 2 barrel 442 in 1968.
Is there anything I can use to try and identify the originating vehicle model?
Thanks
StoneCAD
Is there anything I can use to try and identify the originating vehicle model?
Thanks
StoneCAD
#2
I picked up this core engine yesterday. It is a G block - engine stamp appears to be 38m344066. C heads, although it has the 2 barrel turnpike cruiser intake on it. This came out of a wrecking yard and was sitting in a '65 Starfire car. The intake dates to a 68 as well. My question and perhaps its unanswerable - I read on 442.com that there were 2 barrel 442 in 1968.
Is there anything I can use to try and identify the originating vehicle model?
Thanks
StoneCAD
Is there anything I can use to try and identify the originating vehicle model?
Thanks
StoneCAD
There was certainly a 2 bbl 400 available in 68 but if I remember correctly there was only one 2 bbl intake in 68 and it could have been from a 400 vista cruiser or any other 455 as well.
edit: (In addition to the 442 Turnpike Cruiser option)
Last edited by allyolds68; February 13th, 2014 at 06:12 AM.
#3
#5
All Big Blocks got notched valve covers in 68. The fact that they're on backwards tells me someone has messed with the engine
Are the valve covers painted red?
Are the valve covers painted red?
Last edited by allyolds68; February 13th, 2014 at 07:37 AM.
#7
There is some red color there yes.
edit: I believe the engine was painted red over an original bronze color. It came out of a 65 starfire and I believe those had red 425 BBO engines - In the pic I posted I see red and bronze colors... I am picking the engine up this weekend. The wrecker needed time to pull the engine. I will get some better pictures when I get the engine on a stand.
Last edited by stonecad; February 13th, 2014 at 08:16 AM.
#8
Pulled some codes off the engine today
Engine ID 38m343066
Block ID (rear below flywheel) 68 over F3 in 1" letters
PS Exhaust 384784 RH D2
Carb 7040156 over 3009HD1
Oil Tube Stamped - 8437121
Waterpump 400269
Odd markings on Heads, and Crank CCC - see attached picture of end of crank shaft.
Markings on heads are on the flat faces similar to where pre 68 Engine Id's were.
Any help on what I've got to work with here is much appreciated.
Thanks
StoneCAD
Engine ID 38m343066
Block ID (rear below flywheel) 68 over F3 in 1" letters
PS Exhaust 384784 RH D2
Carb 7040156 over 3009HD1
Oil Tube Stamped - 8437121
Waterpump 400269
Odd markings on Heads, and Crank CCC - see attached picture of end of crank shaft.
Markings on heads are on the flat faces similar to where pre 68 Engine Id's were.
Any help on what I've got to work with here is much appreciated.
Thanks
StoneCAD
#10
The carb is definitely a model year 1970 unit with a build date of 3009 (300th day of 1969).
The oil fill tube definitely shows it came from a model year 1968 engine (first number starts with "8").
The water pump is definitely an original for a '68 400ci engine.
Not sure about the passenger side exhaust manifold.
Randy C.
The oil fill tube definitely shows it came from a model year 1968 engine (first number starts with "8").
The water pump is definitely an original for a '68 400ci engine.
Not sure about the passenger side exhaust manifold.
Randy C.
#11
The carb is definitely a model year 1970 unit with a build date of 3009 (300th day of 1969).
The oil fill tube definitely shows it came from a model year 1968 engine (first number starts with "8").
The water pump is definitely an original for a '68 400ci engine.
Not sure about the passenger side exhaust manifold.
Randy C.
The oil fill tube definitely shows it came from a model year 1968 engine (first number starts with "8").
The water pump is definitely an original for a '68 400ci engine.
Not sure about the passenger side exhaust manifold.
Randy C.
#12
IIRC my uncle's 442 "turnpike cruiser" has a different casting number on the driver's side "X" manifold (other than the typical 389269 LH).
What manifolds are on this engine? Single exhaust or dual? Did '68 station wagons with 400 2bbls have dual exhaust?
EDIT: 384784 RH D2 - is a '65-'67 full size (425) manifold
What manifolds are on this engine? Single exhaust or dual? Did '68 station wagons with 400 2bbls have dual exhaust?
EDIT: 384784 RH D2 - is a '65-'67 full size (425) manifold
#13
IIRC my uncle's 442 "turnpike cruiser" has a different casting number on the driver's side "X" manifold (other than the typical 389269 LH).
What manifolds are on this engine? Single exhaust or dual? Did '68 station wagons with 400 2bbls have dual exhaust?
EDIT: 384784 RH D2 - is a '65-'67 full size (425) manifold
What manifolds are on this engine? Single exhaust or dual? Did '68 station wagons with 400 2bbls have dual exhaust?
EDIT: 384784 RH D2 - is a '65-'67 full size (425) manifold
#14
Just so we're clear, in 1968 the 2bbl G-block 400 was available in both the Turnpike Cruiser 442 and in the Vista Cruiser. There's no way to tell from the VIN derivative which one it came from (nor, frankly, does it matter). And only A-body BBOs got notched valve covers. Those in full size cars did not.
#15
That is good to know. Is there any truth to the origin of the F3 raised lettering on the rear under the flywheel? I read somewhere that it had to do with nickle content but the same article said the 68 engines should only have a letter and not a number...
#17
Dave,
I researched this in the 68 assembly manual one time and came to the conclusion that all 2bbl motors were low compression regardless of whether they were for a Turnpike Cruiser application or not so they would have had small valves. Not to say that the heads couldn't have been changed somewhere along the way...
#18
#19
Dave,
I researched this in the 68 assembly manual one time and came to the conclusion that all 2bbl motors were low compression regardless of whether they were for a Turnpike Cruiser application or not so they would have had small valves. Not to say that the heads couldn't have been changed somewhere along the way...
I researched this in the 68 assembly manual one time and came to the conclusion that all 2bbl motors were low compression regardless of whether they were for a Turnpike Cruiser application or not so they would have had small valves. Not to say that the heads couldn't have been changed somewhere along the way...
Yes when had heads off I believe the piston ratios were 9 or 9.5
#20
StoneCAD
#22
#23
Yet another urban myth that will not die. There is no connection between the block markings and any variation in nickel content.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Beau Dirt
Parts Wanted
6
December 27th, 2021 03:02 PM
63 F85 Cutlass
Small Blocks
18
February 8th, 2015 03:20 PM