General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

1968 400 2 barrel (Turnpike?)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old February 13th, 2014, 05:01 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
stonecad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 185
1968 400 2 barrel (Turnpike?)

I picked up this core engine yesterday. It is a G block - engine stamp appears to be 38m344066. C heads, although it has the 2 barrel turnpike cruiser intake on it. This came out of a wrecking yard and was sitting in a '65 Starfire car. The intake dates to a 68 as well. My question and perhaps its unanswerable - I read on 442.com that there were 2 barrel 442 in 1968.


Is there anything I can use to try and identify the originating vehicle model?


Thanks


StoneCAD
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG_0810.jpg (52.8 KB, 66 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_0805.jpg (29.4 KB, 65 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_0806.jpg (51.9 KB, 73 views)
stonecad is offline  
Old February 13th, 2014, 05:29 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
allyolds68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seneca Falls, NY
Posts: 5,269
Originally Posted by stonecad
I picked up this core engine yesterday. It is a G block - engine stamp appears to be 38m344066. C heads, although it has the 2 barrel turnpike cruiser intake on it. This came out of a wrecking yard and was sitting in a '65 Starfire car. The intake dates to a 68 as well. My question and perhaps its unanswerable - I read on 442.com that there were 2 barrel 442 in 1968.


Is there anything I can use to try and identify the originating vehicle model?


Thanks


StoneCAD

There was certainly a 2 bbl 400 available in 68 but if I remember correctly there was only one 2 bbl intake in 68 and it could have been from a 400 vista cruiser or any other 455 as well.


edit: (In addition to the 442 Turnpike Cruiser option)

Last edited by allyolds68; February 13th, 2014 at 06:12 AM.
allyolds68 is offline  
Old February 13th, 2014, 06:06 AM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
stonecad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 185
Originally Posted by allyolds68
There was certainly a 2 bbl 400 available in 68 but if I remember correctly there was only one 2 bbl intake in 68 and it could have been from a 400 vista cruiser or any other 455 as well.


Thanks for the info.
stonecad is offline  
Old February 13th, 2014, 07:26 AM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
stonecad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 185
Are notched valve covers an indication of anything?
stonecad is offline  
Old February 13th, 2014, 07:35 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
allyolds68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seneca Falls, NY
Posts: 5,269
Originally Posted by stonecad
Are notched valve covers an indication of anything?
All Big Blocks got notched valve covers in 68. The fact that they're on backwards tells me someone has messed with the engine


Are the valve covers painted red?

Last edited by allyolds68; February 13th, 2014 at 07:37 AM.
allyolds68 is offline  
Old February 13th, 2014, 07:46 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
dnmfranco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NEW HARTFORD CT
Posts: 2,632
Yes L -65 available in the Vista as well as 442 turnpike cruiser .
28158 two barrel w/o a/c
28159 " " w a/c
dnmfranco is offline  
Old February 13th, 2014, 07:59 AM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
stonecad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 185
Originally Posted by allyolds68
All Big Blocks got notched valve covers in 68. The fact that they're on backwards tells me someone has messed with the engine


Are the valve covers painted red?


There is some red color there yes.


edit: I believe the engine was painted red over an original bronze color. It came out of a 65 starfire and I believe those had red 425 BBO engines - In the pic I posted I see red and bronze colors... I am picking the engine up this weekend. The wrecker needed time to pull the engine. I will get some better pictures when I get the engine on a stand.

Last edited by stonecad; February 13th, 2014 at 08:16 AM.
stonecad is offline  
Old February 13th, 2014, 04:51 PM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
stonecad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 185
Pulled some codes off the engine today


Engine ID 38m343066
Block ID (rear below flywheel) 68 over F3 in 1" letters
PS Exhaust 384784 RH D2
Carb 7040156 over 3009HD1
Oil Tube Stamped - 8437121
Waterpump 400269


Odd markings on Heads, and Crank CCC - see attached picture of end of crank shaft.


Markings on heads are on the flat faces similar to where pre 68 Engine Id's were.


Any help on what I've got to work with here is much appreciated.


Thanks


StoneCAD
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG_0812.jpg (54.7 KB, 35 views)
stonecad is offline  
Old February 13th, 2014, 05:59 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
dnmfranco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NEW HARTFORD CT
Posts: 2,632
id number 68 olds block

the carb I believe is a 70

water pump is 68 for a/c
dnmfranco is offline  
Old February 13th, 2014, 08:14 PM
  #10  
Randy C.
 
rcorrigan5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Albany, OR
Posts: 3,258
The carb is definitely a model year 1970 unit with a build date of 3009 (300th day of 1969).

The oil fill tube definitely shows it came from a model year 1968 engine (first number starts with "8").

The water pump is definitely an original for a '68 400ci engine.

Not sure about the passenger side exhaust manifold.

Randy C.
rcorrigan5 is offline  
Old February 13th, 2014, 08:58 PM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
stonecad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 185
Originally Posted by rcorrigan5
The carb is definitely a model year 1970 unit with a build date of 3009 (300th day of 1969).

The oil fill tube definitely shows it came from a model year 1968 engine (first number starts with "8").

The water pump is definitely an original for a '68 400ci engine.

Not sure about the passenger side exhaust manifold.

Randy C.
Thanks for the info.
stonecad is offline  
Old February 13th, 2014, 08:59 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
hurst68olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,580
IIRC my uncle's 442 "turnpike cruiser" has a different casting number on the driver's side "X" manifold (other than the typical 389269 LH).


What manifolds are on this engine? Single exhaust or dual? Did '68 station wagons with 400 2bbls have dual exhaust?


EDIT: 384784 RH D2 - is a '65-'67 full size (425) manifold
hurst68olds is offline  
Old February 13th, 2014, 09:02 PM
  #13  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
stonecad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 185
Originally Posted by hurst68olds
IIRC my uncle's 442 "turnpike cruiser" has a different casting number on the driver's side "X" manifold (other than the typical 389269 LH).


What manifolds are on this engine? Single exhaust or dual? Did '68 station wagons with 400 2bbls have dual exhaust?


EDIT: 384784 RH D2 - is a '65-'67 full size (425) manifold
This makes sense since the motor was in a 65 starfire. Prevous owner probably left his exhaust alone. The drives side exhaust manifold is missing.
stonecad is offline  
Old February 14th, 2014, 10:48 AM
  #14  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,902
Just so we're clear, in 1968 the 2bbl G-block 400 was available in both the Turnpike Cruiser 442 and in the Vista Cruiser. There's no way to tell from the VIN derivative which one it came from (nor, frankly, does it matter). And only A-body BBOs got notched valve covers. Those in full size cars did not.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old February 14th, 2014, 11:10 AM
  #15  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
stonecad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 185
That is good to know. Is there any truth to the origin of the F3 raised lettering on the rear under the flywheel? I read somewhere that it had to do with nickle content but the same article said the 68 engines should only have a letter and not a number...
stonecad is offline  
Old February 14th, 2014, 11:26 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
oldsmobiledave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Delta BC Canada
Posts: 3,688
intake valve size on Turnpike C 400

If you pull off one of the C heads I would be curious to know if the intake valves are 2.00" or 2.072" versions.
oldsmobiledave is offline  
Old February 14th, 2014, 11:30 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
allyolds68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seneca Falls, NY
Posts: 5,269
Originally Posted by oldsmobiledave
If you pull off one of the C heads I would be curious to know if the intake valves are 2.00" or 2.072" versions.

Dave,


I researched this in the 68 assembly manual one time and came to the conclusion that all 2bbl motors were low compression regardless of whether they were for a Turnpike Cruiser application or not so they would have had small valves. Not to say that the heads couldn't have been changed somewhere along the way...
allyolds68 is offline  
Old February 14th, 2014, 11:32 AM
  #18  
Registered User
 
dnmfranco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NEW HARTFORD CT
Posts: 2,632
Originally Posted by oldsmobiledave
If you pull off one of the C heads I would be curious to know if the intake valves are 2.00" or 2.072" versions.
Dave, the turnpike I owned a few years ago had 2 inch only and was non a/c Dean
dnmfranco is offline  
Old February 14th, 2014, 11:33 AM
  #19  
Registered User
 
dnmfranco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NEW HARTFORD CT
Posts: 2,632
Originally Posted by allyolds68
Dave,


I researched this in the 68 assembly manual one time and came to the conclusion that all 2bbl motors were low compression regardless of whether they were for a Turnpike Cruiser application or not so they would have had small valves. Not to say that the heads couldn't have been changed somewhere along the way...

Yes when had heads off I believe the piston ratios were 9 or 9.5
dnmfranco is offline  
Old February 14th, 2014, 11:34 AM
  #20  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
stonecad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 185
Originally Posted by oldsmobiledave
If you pull off one of the C heads I would be curious to know if the intake valves are 2.00" or 2.072" versions.
I'm going to be tearing it down over the weekend and am quite interested in that as well. I'll post pics of the interior components as well....


StoneCAD
stonecad is offline  
Old February 14th, 2014, 11:36 AM
  #21  
Registered User
 
oldsmobiledave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Delta BC Canada
Posts: 3,688
more

I believe that a 1968 TC 400 will have 2.00" intake valves but you never know until you look. Real simple to measure once the head is off.


thanks
oldsmobiledave is offline  
Old February 14th, 2014, 11:58 AM
  #22  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
Originally Posted by allyolds68
... all 2bbl motors were low compression regardless of whether they were for a Turnpike Cruiser application or not...
Yes, according to the 1968 SPECS Guide, there was only one 2bbl 400 available, with 290HP / 425 ft/lbs.

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old February 14th, 2014, 12:34 PM
  #23  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,902
Originally Posted by stonecad
That is good to know. Is there any truth to the origin of the F3 raised lettering on the rear under the flywheel? I read somewhere that it had to do with nickle content but the same article said the 68 engines should only have a letter and not a number...
Yet another urban myth that will not die. There is no connection between the block markings and any variation in nickel content.
joe_padavano is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Beau Dirt
Parts Wanted
6
December 27th, 2021 03:02 PM
jjokrm
Small Blocks
42
November 19th, 2016 03:22 PM
63 F85 Cutlass
Small Blocks
18
February 8th, 2015 03:20 PM
thapachuco
Small Blocks
7
July 27th, 2013 02:51 PM
66ninetyeightls
Big Blocks
3
March 28th, 2010 07:40 AM



Quick Reply: 1968 400 2 barrel (Turnpike?)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:30 PM.