Replace disburtor weights?

Old May 13, 2008 | 08:26 AM
  #1  
Redog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,145
From: Far Northeast Philadelphia, PA
Replace disburtor weights?

how hard is it?

I was told my weights are shot and that is why I need a new ign. These weight kits are only $3 to $10. Beats $175
Old May 13, 2008 | 09:01 AM
  #2  
Rallye469's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,662
From: Jacksonville, FL
Piece of cake...just don't loose the tiny little springs when you're sprawled out over your fenders trying to put them in...

And prepare to do it a few times to get the right spring & weight combo.
Old May 13, 2008 | 09:28 AM
  #3  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,770
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Redog
how hard is it?

I was told my weights are shot and that is why I need a new ign. These weight kits are only $3 to $10. Beats $175
While it's not impossible for the weights to be bad, I'd want to understand what was "shot" before replacing anything. The two possible failure modes are 1) the weights have rusted in place and you get no advance or 2) the holes in the weights are worn and you get erratic advance. If the latter, it's also possible that the posts that serve as pivot points are also worn, which gets a lot closer to a new distributor. Understand the problem before replacing parts.
Old May 13, 2008 | 10:33 AM
  #4  
Redog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,145
From: Far Northeast Philadelphia, PA
The weights "spin" too much, knocking the advance out.
Old May 13, 2008 | 03:38 PM
  #5  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,770
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Redog
The weights "spin" too much, knocking the advance out.
Well, again, what exactly does that mean? The two weights pivot out due to centrifugal force. They pivot on small pins. A spring on each weight holds them in place. An ear on each weight near the pivot limits the total travel outboard. The weights don't exactly "spin" and I don't understand what "knocking the advance out" means. If you're saying the mechanical advance is erratic, that's one thing. If you're saying the mechanical advance provides too much advance, you don't need to change the weights to fix that. If you're saying the advance curve is too fast (or too slow) you need to change the springs, not the weights. At the risk of channeling Norm, your statement really doesn't make sense.
Old May 13, 2008 | 06:21 PM
  #6  
Redog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,145
From: Far Northeast Philadelphia, PA
I know my engine turns at 3500 RPMs at 65 MPH, It used to be 70 at the same RPMs which is still too high. This happened with no timing changes.

At 3500 RPMs when I had the points I was going 85.

IfI take off the cap and rotor and see the weights. I can move the weights freely back and forth. Is this normal?

The timing is right. I believe it's at 23 not 20. But when my old mech set it at 36 ( ) it's been pretty much the same as it is now
Old May 13, 2008 | 06:45 PM
  #7  
Redog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,145
From: Far Northeast Philadelphia, PA
EDIT : Nevermind

Stock dis replacement is $100

Last edited by Redog; May 13, 2008 at 06:52 PM.
Old May 14, 2008 | 01:36 AM
  #8  
88 coupe's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,212
From: Southern CA
Originally Posted by Redog
I know my engine turns at 3500 RPMs at 65 miles per hour, It used to be 70 at the same RPMs which is still too high. This happened with no timing changes.

At 3500 RPMs when I had the points I was going 85 ........
https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...iming-hei.html

https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...e-problem.html

This is the third time around. Maybe one, or two, of the laws of physics have changed since the last go around.

Norm
Old May 14, 2008 | 04:58 AM
  #9  
Oldsguy's Avatar
Past Administrator
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 10,358
From: Rural Waxahachie Texas
Originally Posted by Redog
...IfI take off the cap and rotor and see the weights. I can move the weights freely back and forth. Is this normal?
You can move them around the axis of the pin they are mounted on by a number of degrees (maybe 20) but there should be spring tension to it.
Old May 14, 2008 | 06:24 AM
  #10  
Redog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,145
From: Far Northeast Philadelphia, PA
Originally Posted by 88 coupe
https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...iming-hei.html

https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...e-problem.html

This is the third time around. Maybe one, or two, of the laws of physics have changed since the last go around.

Norm
Or maybe I have yet to get a straight answer on if I can just replace the springs and weights or do I need a new dis.

BTW the coil is an OE replacement. I'm not spending $50 on a "50,000" volt coil
Old May 14, 2008 | 06:42 AM
  #11  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,770
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Redog
I know my engine turns at 3500 RPMs at 65 miles per hour, It used to be 70 at the same RPMs which is still too high. This happened with no timing changes.

At 3500 RPMs when I had the points I was going 85.

IfI take off the cap and rotor and see the weights. I can move the weights freely back and forth. Is this normal?

The timing is right. I believe it's at 23 not 20. But when my old mech set it at 36 ( ) it's been pretty much the same as it is now
OK, first, the engine RPM at speed is a function of the trans gear (and/or slippage), final drive ratio, and tire diameter. Period. If you've getting different RPMs at the same speed, you either have slippage in the trans/converter, you've changed tire diameter (or inflation pressure), or your tach is reading wrong. Since this change seems to be tied to the change from points to electronic, I vote for the latter. Changing the advance weights by themselves CANNOT change the RPM at a given speed. As Norm correctly points out, for this to be possible would require a repeal of the laws of physics.

Get your hands on an inductive tach (the kind that clamps on the spark plug wire) and temporarily install it so you can read the tach while you drive. Compare the reading to your in-car tach, THEN figure out what's going on.

Last edited by joe_padavano; May 14, 2008 at 06:43 AM. Reason: spelling
Old May 14, 2008 | 11:39 AM
  #12  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,770
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Redog
Or maybe I have yet to get a straight answer on if I can just replace the springs and weights or do I need a new dis.
And to answer this question once and for all, yes, it's trivial to replace the weights and springs. Remove the cap, remove the rotor, remove the advance springs, remove the weights. Reverse the process to replace.
Old May 14, 2008 | 06:41 PM
  #13  
Redog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,145
From: Far Northeast Philadelphia, PA
Thank you and now I'm done.

OE replacement is $98 and a $14 core
Old May 14, 2008 | 09:57 PM
  #14  
88 coupe's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,212
From: Southern CA
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
........ it's trivial to replace the weights and springs ........
http://store.summitracing.com/egnsea...04681&D=304681

And also inexpensive.

Norm
Old May 15, 2008 | 06:21 AM
  #15  
Olds64's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 18,202
From: Edmond, OK
would require a repeal of the laws of physics
"I canna change the laws of physics Cap'n."
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DoubleV
Small Blocks
16
Feb 8, 2015 12:06 PM
455Olds
General Discussion
11
Dec 18, 2013 05:44 PM
Ken'sConvertible
General Questions
3
Jul 22, 2013 12:30 PM
MDchanic
Big Blocks
4
Sep 13, 2011 05:31 AM
RetroRanger
Small Blocks
10
Sep 12, 2011 09:57 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:00 AM.