power from 307

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 02:37 PM
  #1  
olds307owner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 23
From: Roma, TX
power from 307

Hey everyone, I am new to this forum. I own a 1985 oldsmobile delta 88 with the vin Y 307. transmission is a 200-4r and rear gears are stock. I have tried to look for other threads on getting performance but I havent really found any. Most just say to swap a 350 and right now I cant really afford a 350 so I have to make with what I got. I was thinking of swapping in some 3.73 gears. Around how badly would this affect my gas mileage? Would this create faster wear on the engine? It currently has 175,000 miles and I dont want to rebuild it. How about shaving the heads? would that give me good power? If it does how badly would it affect my gas mileage? Thanks, any suggestions or responses will be appreciated.
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 03:47 PM
  #2  
Redog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,145
From: Far Northeast Philadelphia, PA
I too have a 85 Delta 88, right now it sits due to the 307 going BOOM.

I put 3.42 in the rear and my MPG dropped from 16 to 12, no big deal though, but now I'm swapping in a 68 Olds 350 and 350 trans the car.

My advice, don't waste too much money on the 307, do what you gotta do to keep it running, and save money for a swap
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 04:01 PM
  #3  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,803
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Redog
My advice, don't waste too much money on the 307, do what you gotta do to keep it running, and save money for a swap
I'll second that, only I'd recommend a 403. The only substitute for cubic inches is rectangular dollars. (and the only reason I haven't replaced the 307 in my wagon is that the 307 was rebuilt just before I got the car)
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 07:55 PM
  #4  
olds307owner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 23
From: Roma, TX
Yeah I totally agree as well, the swap would be best, its just that I cant afford the swap until maybe another year, so on the mean time I am putting parts transferable to the 350 (K&N, muffler, ignition, etc...) I am starting to get decent power. Just last week i almost beat a v6 ford and v6 gmc pickup (Which does not sound good but is, considering I have stock rear gears). Since I dont have much money my next "project" is a carb spacer, clean EGR tubes in manifold once carb is removed, edelbrock primary jets, and secondary rods and hangers for the carb. Does anyone have recomedations for jet and rod sizes?
Old Jul 26, 2007 | 07:50 PM
  #5  
rfaller's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 46
its a 307. dont bother. it is te weakest chevy motor ever built. cam is low profile and soft. you could add headers, ect. it may help a little but not much.carb spacers, or even a new carb will not help. one thing that might help alot is to swap that tranny for a turbo 350. junkyard will be fine. and it'll double the 1/4 time of the car without changing anything else. the 200 is the biggest piece of junk since they unhitched the horses. they may make a shiftkit for it but i;m not sure. check with summit racing. it may help some. other than that , save your money. you're doing cosmetic things that wont help you. more carb,more exhaust flow, ect are designed to free up extra horsepower. your motor isnt creating any. there are no boltons that can change that. you have to start inside the motor. besides, with that mileage, be thankful it starts. in fact, its pretty impressive that it has survived that long
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 03:20 AM
  #6  
88 coupe's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,212
From: Southern CA
Originally Posted by rfaller
........ it is te weakest chevy motor ever built ........
His 307 is an Olds, not a Chev.

The rest of your post is just as useless.

Norm
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 02:16 PM
  #7  
Redog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,145
From: Far Northeast Philadelphia, PA
The 1968 350 Olds motor is in my Delta right now. Don't know what it's running but it is running strong. It's got a 400 turbo behind it

Going to adjust the carb a bit and put in HEI next week, plus I gotta repalce the valve cover gaskets.

The Delta with the 307, I ran an avg of 20.30 in the 1/4 mile. If I worked it, and it would have cost a lot of money to do with not so good results.

K&N, ign, and exhaust are good, becuase they do transfer over with no problems. but if it's newer than 85 the ports won't match an aftermarket manifold.

Plus the 307 is too weak to handle a lot of power. It's strong enough to handle the 180 hp that the 442's have, but nothing more than 225 or 250 HP which most older small blocks start at


Do you have emissions testing? I would take off those EGR tubes and plug up the holes. That will give you a bit more power, but bring on an SES light and will fail a visual emission test
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 02:23 PM
  #8  
Redog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,145
From: Far Northeast Philadelphia, PA
Originally Posted by rfaller
its a 307. dont bother. it is te weakest chevy motor ever built. cam is low profile and soft.
I think your right, but we are talking olds motors here. the 307 Chevy was back in the late 60's

one thing that might help alot is to swap that tranny for a turbo 350. junkyard will be fine. and it'll double the 1/4 time of the car without changing anything else.
LOL don't tell me you seriously think that LOL

the 200 is the biggest piece of junk since they unhitched the horses. they may make a shiftkit for it but i;m not sure.
Not true, it can be built as strong as the 700 and with a lower first gear, best thing for drag racing. And they do make shift kits for it.

Anything else?
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 03:08 PM
  #9  
J-(Chicago)'s Avatar
Seasoned beater pilot.
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,468
From: Chicago
I too have an 85 Delta 88 haha. This may be off the subject matter a little bit, but Is there a difference between a 200 4r and a 200 c ? I remember I couldn't find a pan gasket at the local parts stores and I had to order one from carquest for a 200 c. It was a few years ago so I could be mistaken though. I just remember being like !?!?! wtf is a 200metric? What a gip.

307- - -If you weren't in Texas I'd tell you to grab a 350 off my garage floor and start shinin'
I have crap everywhere lol.
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 07:55 PM
  #10  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,803
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by J-(Chicago)
I too have an 85 Delta 88 haha. This may be off the subject matter a little bit, but Is there a difference between a 200 4r and a 200 c ? I remember I couldn't find a pan gasket at the local parts stores and I had to order one from carquest for a 200 c. It was a few years ago so I could be mistaken though. I just remember being like !?!?! wtf is a 200metric? What a gip.

307- - -If you weren't in Texas I'd tell you to grab a 350 off my garage floor and start shinin'
I have crap everywhere lol.
The 200 (with or without "C") is a three speed. The 200-4R is a four speed. The trans pans, gaskets, cases, etc. are different, so a 200C gasket will not fit a 200-4R.
Old Jul 28, 2007 | 09:31 AM
  #11  
J-(Chicago)'s Avatar
Seasoned beater pilot.
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,468
From: Chicago
Makes perfect sense.
Delta--> no overdrive
98--> overdrive
Thanks Joe. You are most helpful to this site.
Old Jul 28, 2007 | 04:07 PM
  #12  
rfaller's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 46
my fault reddog, i meant olds, not chevy.as far as tranny's go. i agree a 200 can be built to run as good as a 700.so can a go cart.. i am not an olds expert like many of you.i build hotrods mostly. gm's so called performance 700r is junk too. with alot of work and money, you can make a 700 as good as a turbo 350.but it still wont hold up to the abuse a 350 will.there is no comparison. i have a 94 z28 that i swapped the tranny in and gained a full 3 seconds in the quarter with absolutely no other changes.today's trannys are built for fuel economy, not pure performance.
Old Jul 28, 2007 | 04:15 PM
  #13  
rfaller's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 46
by the way 88coupe, i've spent some time reading all the posts on this site from the beginning and i have to say, someone here is useless.and has been for a while. and since i'm new....?in my post, i wasnt trying to be rude. you seem to answer every post with a rude response.you sound like a real jerk. i wont waste my time responding to anything else you say, but i see your in Pa and i'm in ohio. thats pretty close if you would like to get together and discuss this further.
Old Jul 28, 2007 | 06:23 PM
  #14  
88 coupe's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,212
From: Southern CA
Originally Posted by rfaller
........ i have a 94 z28 that i swapped the tranny in and gained a full 3 seconds in the quarter with absolutely no other changes ........
I am impressed.

Norm
Old Jul 28, 2007 | 06:29 PM
  #15  
88 coupe's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,212
From: Southern CA
Originally Posted by rfaller
........ i see your in Pa ........
Again, I am impressed.

I repeat: If you have a problem with the content of my post(s) bring it on.

If it is with my posting style, send me a PM.

Norm
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
carbonf00tprint
Small Blocks
20
Nov 4, 2012 07:53 AM
KZ442
Interior/Upholstery
5
Apr 10, 2009 03:16 AM
1FSTLS1
Big Blocks
2
May 30, 2008 07:42 AM
<bigdisel42>
Small Blocks
1
Apr 23, 2005 09:44 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:13 AM.