Joe, Newbie really needs your help with Starfire

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old April 9th, 2009 | 09:03 AM
  #1  
64starfireme's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 16
From: SE Minnesota
Joe, Newbie really needs your help with Starfire

I was new to the board back in Jan. I have a 1964 Starfire that may need a donor frame. Could anyone (Joe) please, please tell me what other models would be a direct swap. I really need to begin my search to get my project started. I live in SE Minnesota. Thanks. J.R.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
1964 Starfire.jpg (82.3 KB, 14 views)
Old April 9th, 2009 | 09:51 AM
  #2  
tndrtgr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 149
From: Williams, Ca
Call John at Big M Automotive in Williams, Ca. He has a book that may tell you which frames will work and he may have a frame for you. His number is (530) 473-2225.
Old April 9th, 2009 | 12:34 PM
  #3  
64starfireme's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 16
From: SE Minnesota
M'Lisa,

Thank you so much. John was very nice and extremely helpfull. I already have some leads.

J.R.
Old April 9th, 2009 | 01:26 PM
  #4  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
A '64 Jetstar 1 (not to be confused with a Jetstar 88) is definitely the same.

Beyond that, I don't know without looking into it further.
Old April 9th, 2009 | 02:51 PM
  #5  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,401
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by wmachine
A '64 Jetstar 1 (not to be confused with a Jetstar 88) is definitely the same.

Beyond that, I don't know without looking into it further.
Any 1963-1964 Olds B-body 2dr EXCEPT the 1964 Jetstar 88 will use the same frame. Ninety Eights used a longer wheelbase.
Old April 9th, 2009 | 05:42 PM
  #6  
64starfireme's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 16
From: SE Minnesota
John at Big M automotive was very helpful. He looked in "his book" and gave me several 88 models that would work as well as the starfire and the Jetstar I. I asked him if only the 2 door would work and he said that his book didn't seem to differenciate between the 2 and 4 door. My service manual lists the 2 door and 4 door 88's as having the same wheelbase. Can anyone verify or dispute that the frames from the 64's either 2 door or 4 door will be a direct swap? Thanks again to John and anyone else that can help me with my problem and search.
Old April 10th, 2009 | 03:59 AM
  #7  
Yellowstatue's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,087
From: Too close to Toronto!!
Smile Foundation

Frame assembly -1964 D88,S88,J/star1,S/fire..(Ex. S.W or Conv.) PN 382622... D88, S/fire Conv. PN382624...* Note- For police pursuit also install two of PN 381962 rear stabilizer link brackets...(must be for when you are chasing cop cars)... Special Duty- For hauling trailers..ex conv. PN 382624

Last edited by Yellowstatue; April 10th, 2009 at 04:02 AM. Reason: More stuff!
Old April 10th, 2009 | 06:31 AM
  #8  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,401
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Yellowstatue
...police pursuit ...(must be for when you are chasing cop cars)...


So there you have it. All 64 88s and derivatives used the same wheelbase. As that listing also shows, the boxed convertible frame was offered as the HD frame under hardtops.
Old April 10th, 2009 | 08:42 AM
  #9  
marinus_'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 253
From: Grassie Ontario Canada
Originally Posted by joe_padavano


So there you have it. All 64 88s and derivatives used the same wheelbase. As that listing also shows, the boxed convertible frame was offered as the HD frame under hardtops.
Joe,

What excatly is a 'boxed convertible frame'?
Does anyone have photo's of this?
Old April 10th, 2009 | 10:19 AM
  #10  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,401
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by marinus_
Joe,

What excatly is a 'boxed convertible frame'?
Does anyone have photo's of this?
The standard frame is an open section "C" channel, with the open side facing inward. When you cut the top off the car to make a convertible, you lose torsional stiffness in the body. GM formed matching "C" channel sections to fit into the hardtop frame rails and welded them in place (open side to open side), turning the "C" channel into a box beam. That has significantly more torsional stiffness and also increased bending stiffness. The outer frame rails, front frame (in front of the firewall), and rear frame (rear axle and back) were identical between HT and convert. Only the part under the rockers was reinforced.
Old April 10th, 2009 | 11:08 AM
  #11  
marinus_'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 253
From: Grassie Ontario Canada
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
The standard frame is an open section "C" channel, with the open side facing inward. When you cut the top off the car to make a convertible, you lose torsional stiffness in the body. GM formed matching "C" channel sections to fit into the hardtop frame rails and welded them in place (open side to open side), turning the "C" channel into a box beam. That has significantly more torsional stiffness and also increased bending stiffness. The outer frame rails, front frame (in front of the firewall), and rear frame (rear axle and back) were identical between HT and convert. Only the part under the rockers was reinforced.
Well that shows how much I know. LOL
I thought that the frame on my convertible Starfire had been repaired at one time because it looks like there were pieces welded in. Maybe it is original after all.....

Sorry for hijacking you thread Joe!!

Thanks,
Rene
Old April 11th, 2009 | 12:49 AM
  #12  
Yellowstatue's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,087
From: Too close to Toronto!!
Smile Boxed and shipped!!

Also, the '68-'72 Cutlass converts and Vistas had a wider and shorter (side to side) trans crossmember because of the boxing.....no naughty pictures yet..I am still in night school on that one...
Old April 11th, 2009 | 07:40 AM
  #13  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,401
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Yellowstatue
Also, the '68-'72 Cutlass converts and Vistas had a wider and shorter (side to side) trans crossmember
ALL convertibles had a different crossmember because of this.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
billmerbach
Transmission
8
May 16th, 2014 12:39 PM
dean adkins
The Newbie Forum
5
June 28th, 2011 09:55 AM
65cutty
Tech Editor's Desk
0
September 11th, 2008 08:25 PM
DinkyDow
Cutlass
1
September 1st, 2006 06:02 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:57 PM.