Can't go wrong for $1200.
#1
Can't go wrong for $1200.
Just picked this beautiful '73 Delta Royale ( if you like green 4 doors) up yesterday. I certainly didn't need another car but sometimes you just can't walk away !
#4
Fantastic. I always thought those four-door hardtops were very good-looking cars. What you've got there represents the height of middle-class luxury back in those days. I've got a '73 Custom Cruiser, so the dash and front end are very familiar. Good luck with it. It looks like it needs very little, if anything.
By the way, I'm not much for decoding the body tags, but I at least know that the 03C means it was built in the third week (C) of March (3). So that would be March 1973. That, of course, agrees with the build date shown on the blue sticker. My '73 had been completely repainted, so the blue sticker is not there.
By the way, I'm not much for decoding the body tags, but I at least know that the 03C means it was built in the third week (C) of March (3). So that would be March 1973. That, of course, agrees with the build date shown on the blue sticker. My '73 had been completely repainted, so the blue sticker is not there.
Last edited by jaunty75; April 24th, 2011 at 08:01 AM.
#7
#8
#10
Wow, you are absolutely correct. I have a file 6 inches thick with the car and one of the receipts was to repair front end damage in the 80's. They just rigged it to fit, I guess. That's a scream !
#11
My mom's 86 CS was done in a similar way. When a semi took the front end off of it, the body shop took a complete '84 front end from a donor and just bolted it on and painted it! Functional but cosmetically incorrect...
#13
Just an Olds Guy
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Posts: 24,525
I am really glad you have documentation on the car. That will help you out in the long run for maintenance and provenance of the car. I would have gladly paid the 1200.00 for it too. You could have a real time capsule there if everything else is survivor!
#17
Nice car for the money, looks really nice. I had a "that doesn't look right" moment when I saw the front pic, but it has been pointed out. 12 mpg is okay if it's not a daily driver, 'cuz that's about all they get.
#19
Thanks !
Thanks for all the feedback. Spring Carlisle begins Wed. so I'll be there and, of course, be looking for a grille and bumper for a '73 Royale, among other things. The thrill of the hunt is nearly as satisfying as owning the classic itself. Any other " ClassicOlds " members attending Carlisle this week ?
Last edited by fmbjogger; April 24th, 2011 at 10:57 PM.
#20
#22
Grille close-up
Here's the close-up view of the grille. As has been pointed out ( great catch Allan) the grille is off a '75 made to fit on a '73 nose (?). MDchanic raises the point: Is it even a '73 nose ? As you can see they rigged the grille to fit by riveting a plate to hold the incorrect grille in place. The lower grilles were just squeezed into place and are clearly ill-fitting. That said, it doesn't bother me but if I came across a 73 Grille and bumper, would they fit as is ? Thanks !
#23
Okay, upon closer inspection, I can't be 100% sure what year your nose is, but I can confidently say it's not a '73. The initial photos you posted are too blurry to see the details clearly, and the later one cuts off the nose at the edges of the high beams. One thing it does show for sure is a chrome portion of the bumper extending below the main bumper, and containing the signal lights. This is a different, body-colored piece on the '73.
Here are some pics of '73's:
And one of just the header panel:
(Other pictures of the same panel can be found here.)
It looks to me like the whole nose is from a '75,
but if you post a few more pics of the nose close-up, it may be easier to be absolutely certain.
- Eric
Here are some pics of '73's:
And one of just the header panel:
(Other pictures of the same panel can be found here.)
It looks to me like the whole nose is from a '75,
but if you post a few more pics of the nose close-up, it may be easier to be absolutely certain.
- Eric
Last edited by MDchanic; April 25th, 2011 at 05:54 AM.
#24
You're right, it's definitely a '75 front end.
Attached is a photo of the front end of a '74. For this year, the grilles extended higher and curved toward the rear for more of a waterfall look. It's not a '72 because that year the signal lights were above the bumper.
Attached is a photo of the front end of a '74. For this year, the grilles extended higher and curved toward the rear for more of a waterfall look. It's not a '72 because that year the signal lights were above the bumper.
#27
Just an Olds Guy
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Posts: 24,525
If you decide to restore the front end, remember one thing: patience. That's what I've found over the past 4 years of collecting parts for my 72. Keep on driving it the way it is, when the right donor car comes along and you can get the proper front end parts for a reasonable price that's the time to consider if you want to do something with it.
In the meantime, I sincerely hope you enjoy your ride. It is a really nice looking car. How bout some pics of the other side, tail, trunk and engine?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
6inarow
Cars For Sale
3
August 27th, 2019 11:22 AM
stocki26
Ninety-Eight
13
March 18th, 2013 10:13 AM