Can't go wrong for $1200.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 07:28 AM
  #1  
fmbjogger's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 207
From: Philadelphia
Can't go wrong for $1200.

Just picked this beautiful '73 Delta Royale ( if you like green 4 doors) up yesterday. I certainly didn't need another car but sometimes you just can't walk away !
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
010.jpg (86.3 KB, 124 views)
File Type: jpg
008.jpg (33.4 KB, 187 views)
File Type: jpg
029.jpg (66.5 KB, 77 views)
File Type: jpg
014.jpg (86.9 KB, 79 views)
File Type: jpg
016.jpg (82.4 KB, 84 views)
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 07:34 AM
  #2  
cutlassgal's Avatar
Cutlass Lover
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,587
From: Twinsburg, Ohio
Congratulations!!! Nothing wrong with a green 4 door! She looks pretty nice for her age. (Kinda like me, lol! )
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 07:49 AM
  #3  
fmbjogger's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 207
From: Philadelphia
More '73 green 4 door pics

more
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
012.jpg (107.4 KB, 28 views)
File Type: jpg
023.jpg (78.5 KB, 35 views)
File Type: jpg
031.jpg (129.4 KB, 36 views)
File Type: jpg
005.jpg (33.2 KB, 38 views)
File Type: jpg
010.jpg (83.2 KB, 29 views)
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 07:57 AM
  #4  
jaunty75's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,170
From: southeastern Michigan
Fantastic. I always thought those four-door hardtops were very good-looking cars. What you've got there represents the height of middle-class luxury back in those days. I've got a '73 Custom Cruiser, so the dash and front end are very familiar. Good luck with it. It looks like it needs very little, if anything.

By the way, I'm not much for decoding the body tags, but I at least know that the 03C means it was built in the third week (C) of March (3). So that would be March 1973. That, of course, agrees with the build date shown on the blue sticker. My '73 had been completely repainted, so the blue sticker is not there.

Last edited by jaunty75; Apr 24, 2011 at 08:01 AM.
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 08:08 AM
  #5  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Wow! That's a LOT nicer looking than mine .

- Eric
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 10:28 AM
  #6  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
It's a great looking car for the age. You do realize it has a 1975 front clip and bumper? 1973 is VERY different than what you've got.
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 10:44 AM
  #7  
jaunty75's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,170
From: southeastern Michigan
Originally Posted by Allan R
You do realize it has a 1975 front clip and bumper? 1973 is VERY different than what you've got.
Good grief! You're absolutely right. I didn't notice that the first time I looked at the photo.
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 12:39 PM
  #8  
jo75olds's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 173
Originally Posted by Allan R
It's a great looking car for the age. You do realize it has a 1975 front clip and bumper? 1973 is VERY different than what you've got.
Wow I too didn't notice until you pointed it out! Still a great looking car and for $1,200 how could you go wrong?
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 12:48 PM
  #9  
Lady72nRob71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,798
From: Plano, TX
You did not go wrong. Nice looking car!
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 01:06 PM
  #10  
fmbjogger's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 207
From: Philadelphia
Originally Posted by Allan R
It's a great looking car for the age. You do realize it has a 1975 front clip and bumper? 1973 is VERY different than what you've got.

Wow, you are absolutely correct. I have a file 6 inches thick with the car and one of the receipts was to repair front end damage in the 80's. They just rigged it to fit, I guess. That's a scream !
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 02:06 PM
  #11  
Lady72nRob71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,798
From: Plano, TX
My mom's 86 CS was done in a similar way. When a semi took the front end off of it, the body shop took a complete '84 front end from a donor and just bolted it on and painted it! Functional but cosmetically incorrect...
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 03:21 PM
  #12  
jaunty75's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,170
From: southeastern Michigan
Originally Posted by Lady72nRob71
My mom's 86 CS was done in a similar way.
Yes, but this ain't your mother's Oldsmobile!
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 03:24 PM
  #13  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Originally Posted by jo75olds
Wow I too didn't notice until you pointed it out! Still a great looking car and for $1,200 how could you go wrong?
Originally Posted by Lady72nRob71
You did not go wrong. Nice looking car!
I never said he was wrong. I would have bought it too. The front ends are pretty much interchangeable from 1971 - 1976. What really matters is that he enjoys the car. With 66,000 original miles, WOW. I'd love to have that car too.

Originally Posted by fmbjogger
Wow, you are absolutely correct. I have a file 6 inches thick with the car and one of the receipts was to repair front end damage in the 80's. They just rigged it to fit, I guess. That's a scream !
I am really glad you have documentation on the car. That will help you out in the long run for maintenance and provenance of the car. I would have gladly paid the 1200.00 for it too. You could have a real time capsule there if everything else is survivor!
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 03:25 PM
  #14  
oldspackrat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,859
From: Indianapolis
That is a nice looking car! I'd have bought it too.
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 04:16 PM
  #15  
petya's Avatar
V8 tramp
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 9
From: Albertirsa, Hungary, Europe
Congratulations! Have a lot of nice miles with together!
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 04:17 PM
  #16  
petya's Avatar
V8 tramp
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 9
From: Albertirsa, Hungary, Europe
Originally Posted by petya
Congratulations! Have a lot of nice miles with together!
-with
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 04:50 PM
  #17  
1969w3155's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 9,468
From: Muskegon, Mi.
Nice car for the money, looks really nice. I had a "that doesn't look right" moment when I saw the front pic, but it has been pointed out. 12 mpg is okay if it's not a daily driver, 'cuz that's about all they get.
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 07:23 PM
  #18  
chris79ta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8
that's a nice find! id have bought it too!
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 10:28 PM
  #19  
fmbjogger's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 207
From: Philadelphia
Thanks !

Originally Posted by Allan R
It's a great looking car for the age. You do realize it has a 1975 front clip and bumper? 1973 is VERY different than what you've got.

Thanks for all the feedback. Spring Carlisle begins Wed. so I'll be there and, of course, be looking for a grille and bumper for a '73 Royale, among other things. The thrill of the hunt is nearly as satisfying as owning the classic itself. Any other " ClassicOlds " members attending Carlisle this week ?

Last edited by fmbjogger; Apr 24, 2011 at 10:57 PM.
Old Apr 25, 2011 | 02:57 AM
  #20  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by fmbjogger
... looking for a grille and bumper for a '73 Royale...
Pretty sure you'd need the entire nose from the core support forward - possibly the core support as well (and I don't know whether there's a contour difference to the front fenders).

- Eric
Old Apr 25, 2011 | 04:19 AM
  #21  
snowballs442's Avatar
Resident Eskie
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 258
From: 33.357 - 84.572
Good catch. Looks like you got a tank of gas on top of that.
Old Apr 25, 2011 | 05:01 AM
  #22  
fmbjogger's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 207
From: Philadelphia
Grille close-up

Originally Posted by MDchanic
Pretty sure you'd need the entire nose from the core support forward - possibly the core support as well (and I don't know whether there's a contour difference to the front fenders).

- Eric
Here's the close-up view of the grille. As has been pointed out ( great catch Allan) the grille is off a '75 made to fit on a '73 nose (?). MDchanic raises the point: Is it even a '73 nose ? As you can see they rigged the grille to fit by riveting a plate to hold the incorrect grille in place. The lower grilles were just squeezed into place and are clearly ill-fitting. That said, it doesn't bother me but if I came across a 73 Grille and bumper, would they fit as is ? Thanks !
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
044.jpg (60.0 KB, 15 views)
File Type: jpg
046.jpg (72.6 KB, 140 views)
File Type: jpg
048.jpg (63.4 KB, 14 views)
Old Apr 25, 2011 | 05:51 AM
  #23  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Okay, upon closer inspection, I can't be 100% sure what year your nose is, but I can confidently say it's not a '73. The initial photos you posted are too blurry to see the details clearly, and the later one cuts off the nose at the edges of the high beams. One thing it does show for sure is a chrome portion of the bumper extending below the main bumper, and containing the signal lights. This is a different, body-colored piece on the '73.






Here are some pics of '73's:







And one of just the header panel:


(Other pictures of the same panel can be found here.)

It looks to me like the whole nose is from a '75,



but if you post a few more pics of the nose close-up, it may be easier to be absolutely certain.

- Eric

Last edited by MDchanic; Apr 25, 2011 at 05:54 AM.
Old Apr 25, 2011 | 05:57 AM
  #24  
jaunty75's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,170
From: southeastern Michigan
You're right, it's definitely a '75 front end.

Attached is a photo of the front end of a '74. For this year, the grilles extended higher and curved toward the rear for more of a waterfall look. It's not a '72 because that year the signal lights were above the bumper.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
1974fullsizefrontend.jpg (43.6 KB, 11 views)
Old Apr 25, 2011 | 06:27 AM
  #25  
fmbjogger's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 207
From: Philadelphia
Great detective work, men. i'm starting to think I should leave well-enough alone !
Old Apr 25, 2011 | 06:55 AM
  #26  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by fmbjogger
i'm starting to think I should leave well-enough alone !
I would.

- Eric
Old Apr 25, 2011 | 09:51 AM
  #27  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Originally Posted by fmbjogger
Great detective work, men. i'm starting to think I should leave well-enough alone !
This is your car and you can do whatever you want with it. Leave it alone, modify, restore etc...

If you decide to restore the front end, remember one thing: patience. That's what I've found over the past 4 years of collecting parts for my 72. Keep on driving it the way it is, when the right donor car comes along and you can get the proper front end parts for a reasonable price that's the time to consider if you want to do something with it.

In the meantime, I sincerely hope you enjoy your ride. It is a really nice looking car. How bout some pics of the other side, tail, trunk and engine?
Old Apr 25, 2011 | 10:38 AM
  #28  
Redog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,145
From: Far Northeast Philadelphia, PA
nice car!!
Old Apr 25, 2011 | 10:49 AM
  #29  
D Appeldorn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 586
From: Emmen Drenthe (Netherlands)
mmm, wish my car did look like that when i bought it.

Looks realy nice,
Old Apr 25, 2011 | 02:28 PM
  #30  
fmbjogger's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 207
From: Philadelphia
How bout some pics of the other side, tail, trunk and engine?


Here ya go. No engine or trunk shots yet.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
012.jpg (82.8 KB, 99 views)
File Type: jpg
018.jpg (25.9 KB, 13 views)
File Type: jpg
019.jpg (83.3 KB, 20 views)
File Type: jpg
026.jpg (83.9 KB, 13 views)
File Type: jpg
028.jpg (69.1 KB, 15 views)
Old Apr 25, 2011 | 02:52 PM
  #31  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Roadtrip!!!!
Old Apr 25, 2011 | 03:04 PM
  #32  
jaunty75's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,170
From: southeastern Michigan
Originally Posted by fmbjogger
Here ya go. No engine or trunk shots yet.
Interesting. The rear of your car looks like it came from a '59 Edsel.



Just kidding.
Old Apr 25, 2011 | 03:12 PM
  #33  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley






I kinda like 'em - like square rocket engines!

- Eric
Old May 6, 2011 | 08:28 AM
  #34  
64Rocket's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,384
From: Union City Calif.94587
The passenger side lens is missing the chrome ring. It is still a very nice car. Keep it clean and just drive it. Only us Olds guys notice the little things.
Gene
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
6inarow
Cars For Sale
3
Aug 27, 2019 11:22 AM
jensenracing77
Cars For Sale
2
Sep 7, 2009 06:42 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:17 AM.