Rear Gear Ratio

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 31, 2016 | 08:03 PM
  #1  
Cutlass Fan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 568
From: Saskatchewan
Rear Gear Ratio

What is the stock ratio in a 1965 Cutlass convertible with Jetaway trans and 330 4bll. This is a Canadian car if that makes any difference.
Old May 31, 2016 | 08:21 PM
  #2  
don71's Avatar
same but different
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,958
From: Central Missouri
I can't tell you exactly as there are at least five ratios standard, and two dealer ratios possible.

Do you know the code on the rear end, it will be two letters? AND are you sure its original? A lot of things can change in 45+years.
For example:
SA 2.78
SC 3.08
and others.
The only way to know for sure is to drop the cover. Fluid probably needs changed anyways.

Have you checked out this site. Its all about 65's. http://www.442bro.com/
Old May 31, 2016 | 09:47 PM
  #3  
Cutlass Fan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 568
From: Saskatchewan
I haven't got the car home yet so can't check the rear end. I've got fairly detailed info as to what's been done to the car in the last 15 yrs. and other than a recent oil change and new seals nothing has been done to the rear axle, but I can't say prior to that. Pretty sure the drive train is original tho.
Old Jun 1, 2016 | 06:49 AM
  #4  
oldsmobiledave's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 3,688
From: Delta BC Canada
fyi

It could also be a 2.93. The Oshawa cars sometimes got Buick rear end gear ratios instead of the more common Olds ratios. Both brands were built side by side and I pulled apart several 1965 F-85 and Cutlass cars that had the 2.93 set up.

Most likely it will be a 2.78 open rear end.
Old Jun 2, 2016 | 08:40 PM
  #5  
Cutlass Fan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 568
From: Saskatchewan
Thx for the info. Good to see so many Canadians sharing this forum along with our American friends.
Old Jun 4, 2016 | 12:09 AM
  #6  
Ozzie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,614
From: S.E. Louisiana, so far still in U.S.A.
Originally Posted by Cutlass Fan
What is the stock ratio in a 1965 Cutlass convertible with Jetaway trans and 330 4bll. This is a Canadian car if that makes any difference.
For 1965, Cutlass (series 38), convertible (style 67), Jetaway, & V-8; the CSM says that it could be 3.23, 3.55, or 3.08. It looks like 2.78 was not used for this combination. It says that the 3.55 used a speedometer cable adapter with a 0.8653 to 1 ratio. Tires were 7.35 or 7.75 x 14. There is a code stamped on the housing. Sales information indicates that 3.08 was standard with the other two optional as "performance" ratios. All that's assuming that nothing's been changed. The surefire way is to remove the cover, count teeth and do some division. I don't know if the Canadian cars were treated differently.

Last edited by Ozzie; Jun 4, 2016 at 12:11 AM. Reason: Added information
Old Jun 4, 2016 | 05:16 AM
  #7  
oldsmobiledave's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 3,688
From: Delta BC Canada
but...

Originally Posted by Ozzie
For 1965, Cutlass (series 38), convertible (style 67), Jetaway, & V-8; the CSM says that it could be 3.23, 3.55, or 3.08. It looks like 2.78 was not used for this combination. It says that the 3.55 used a speedometer cable adapter with a 0.8653 to 1 ratio. Tires were 7.35 or 7.75 x 14. There is a code stamped on the housing. Sales information indicates that 3.08 was standard with the other two optional as "performance" ratios. All that's assuming that nothing's been changed. The surefire way is to remove the cover, count teeth and do some division. I don't know if the Canadian cars were treated differently.
The last statement is the key. This is an Oshawa built car & most were 2.78 & some were 2.93 or 3.08.
Old Jun 4, 2016 | 07:01 AM
  #8  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,691
From: Northern VA
The SPECS manual shows that the standard ratio in a Cutlass with Jetaway was 3.08:1. 3.23 and 3.55 were options.

Old Jun 4, 2016 | 04:35 PM
  #9  
oldsmobiledave's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 3,688
From: Delta BC Canada
Gears

Originally Posted by joe_padavano
The SPECS manual shows that the standard ratio in a Cutlass with Jetaway was 3.08:1. 3.23 and 3.55 were options.

I guess they forgot to tell the guys on the line in Oshawa.
Old Jun 5, 2016 | 07:28 AM
  #10  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,691
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by oldsmobiledave
I guess they forgot to tell the guys on the line in Oshawa.
The SPECS booklets sometimes call out the Canadian-built cars in a footnote. This one did not. I don't know what the publishing date on this version was, either. There may be an update out there.
Old Jun 5, 2016 | 07:40 AM
  #11  
oldsmobiledave's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 3,688
From: Delta BC Canada
Gears

I have owned 8 Oshawa built 1964 1965 1966 Culass. 1 1964 had a 3.08 Posi and 1 1965 Cutlass had a 3.08 open. The other 6 were a mix of 2.78 and 2.93.
Old Jun 7, 2016 | 09:33 PM
  #12  
Cutlass Fan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 568
From: Saskatchewan
Thanks for all the info. Guess I'll have to wait till I can count teeth lol.
Old Jun 8, 2016 | 01:30 AM
  #13  
Redog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,145
From: Far Northeast Philadelphia, PA
Do you have the RPO code list on the car? Assuming it's the orginal gear set
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nj_cutlass72
Parts For Sale
4
Nov 20, 2019 09:11 PM
1966Oldsmobile
Drivetrain/Differentials
2
Sep 3, 2013 04:55 AM
rcdynamic88
Drivetrain/Differentials
10
Jul 9, 2010 07:00 AM
442 Guatemala
442
8
Jan 15, 2010 10:43 AM
442 Guatemala
Transmission
0
Jun 11, 2007 10:19 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:31 AM.