1966 442 Gear Ratio

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 1, 2007 | 09:07 PM
  #1  
442 Guatemala's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 108
Question 1966 442 Gear Ratio

Hello im restoring my 1966 442 with 400 engine. Im having a ground up restoration and I wil like to build a nice street car.

Im going to overhaul the engine, bored at .030 and I will like to add a edelbrock manifold, carburetor and headers.

I have a Mounci transmission but I dont know wich one M20, M21 or M22? and I think I have a 3.90 Gear Ratio, But I think this combination is not good for a street car, I think the car is going to be in a hig RPM range with the 3.90 gear ratio.

So what is a good gear ratio for a street car?
Is better to change the gear ratio or buy a new transmission, if yes wich one is recommended to keep the hurst shifter?

thanks

Alex
Old Jul 3, 2007 | 06:34 PM
  #2  
yogi442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 81
From: Blaine Wa
I run 3.42's in my 66 442 and does fine on low end and top end.
Old Jul 25, 2007 | 12:27 AM
  #3  
thegooddocolds's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 9
I'd keep that low rear end; try it, you might like it! Unless you are going to be taking it on long freeway trips, the neck jerk action of those low gears can't be beat!
Old Oct 25, 2008 | 01:02 PM
  #4  
Flamed67's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3
Keep the 3.90 gears Fun Fun Fun!!!!!

I run a stock 330 2 barrel carb in one of my olds with a 3.90, talk about a blast to drive. Will lay rubber for an entire block and thats with the stock 2 speed automatic. A little hard on fuel but who cares when your having fun. I can still run 65 mph on the interstate with no worries.
Old Oct 25, 2008 | 01:15 PM
  #5  
Jamesbo's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,060
From: Atlanta, Georgia
You may find this link informative

http://www.yearone.com/updatedsingle...nfo/muncie.htm
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 11:31 AM
  #6  
todd66442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 135
My 66 442 has 3:08's but It is not the original rear end. I want to find a posi some day.
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 12:01 PM
  #7  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by thegooddocolds
I'd keep that low rear end; try it, you might like it! Unless you are going to be taking it on long freeway trips, the neck jerk action of those low gears can't be beat!
X2. It really depends on how you plan on driving it.
But why add the performance with the intake and exhaust, and take it away with the gears?
Stock will be either the wide ratio M20 or the close ratio M21. 3.90s were standard with the M21, but could be had with either trans, so you can't tell the trans from what rear it has.
Olds thought the 3.90s were a nice match to the M21, and I agree.
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 04:24 PM
  #8  
64Rocket's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,384
From: Union City Calif.94587
Man this thread is 3 years old. I remember this guy had all kinds of trouble with his engine. I wonder what the out come was.

Gene
Old Jan 15, 2010 | 10:43 AM
  #9  
todd66442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 135
post 3 years old

Wow, I guess it is an Old post. I was googling for people with 66 442's and ran into this post. I didn't notice the date of the thread. I wonder if he still has the car.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
442craig
General Discussion
11
Jul 13, 2013 11:04 AM
squirell
General Questions
9
Jul 7, 2009 09:01 AM
Maverick
Drivetrain/Differentials
9
Feb 23, 2008 02:27 AM
jeffs 89 cutlass salon
Drivetrain/Differentials
1
Aug 21, 2007 07:57 PM
442 Guatemala
Transmission
0
Jun 11, 2007 10:19 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:05 PM.