Keep the type O or change

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old January 1st, 2016, 05:33 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
huskerala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Fayetteville NC but originally from Nebraska
Posts: 59
Keep the type O or change

I have a '69 442 with a type O rearend and 3.91 gears. The engine is a mild 455 that will see an upgrade in the future. I'd like to hear if anyone out there is "beating" on the type O 10 8.5 10 bolt and having issues? What can a guy expect out of the type O once it is behind some serious torque (600 ft lb) and sticky rubber? I know some parts are getting hard to find for the type O. What have people been swapping in the place of a type O? Currie Manufacturing 9" or 12 bolts? Strange Engineering?

Thanks for your input.
V/R
Joel C
huskerala is offline  
Old January 1st, 2016, 06:49 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
oldsmobiledave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Delta BC Canada
Posts: 3,688
Fyi

Originally Posted by huskerala
I have a '69 442 with a type O rearend and 3.91 gears. The engine is a mild 455 that will see an upgrade in the future. I'd like to hear if anyone out there is "beating" on the type O 10 8.5 10 bolt and having issues? What can a guy expect out of the type O once it is behind some serious torque (600 ft lb) and sticky rubber? I know some parts are getting hard to find for the type O. What have people been swapping in the place of a type O? Currie Manufacturing 9" or 12 bolts? Strange Engineering?

Thanks for your input.
V/R
Joel C
A local racer here in Calgary does 11.4s @ 116.5 mph in his 68 442 with a Type O and 3.91 gears. No problem behind his 455, T400 and 255 60 15 drag radials.
oldsmobiledave is offline  
Old January 3rd, 2016, 08:39 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
monzaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Richfield, Oh
Posts: 1,745
Money???

If money is NOT an issue (which with muscle cars is now just the normal)
Why destroy a original 3.91 GM rear that a restorer would love to have under there car.
IF you have the Money a 12 bolt Chevy with 33 spline axles and Ford nine large axle bearing 7900 billet end for GM drum brakes... This way you can go full spool if you just want to race or a 33 spline posi eaton or true trac or auburn are all available and the rear will still resemble a original option.

Just my opinion... Jim
J D
monzaz is offline  
Old January 3rd, 2016, 06:18 PM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
huskerala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Fayetteville NC but originally from Nebraska
Posts: 59
Agree

Originally Posted by monzaz
If money is NOT an issue (which with muscle cars is now just the normal)
Why destroy a original 3.81 GM rear that a restorer would love to have under there car.
IF you have the Money a 12 bolt Chevy with 33 spline axles and Ford nine large axle bearing 7900 billet end for GM drum brakes... This way you can go full spool if you just want to race or a 33 spline posi eaton or true trac or auburn are all available and the rear will still resemble a original option.

Just my opinion... Jim
J D
I agree with much of what you said Jim. I'm not a restoration purist. It's not important to me that I have a type O rearend, only that I have one that holds up. I would change the rearend before destroying it and sell it to someone that requires it for their restoration. I won't say that money is not an issue but I can work to afford something that will hold up. I won't go full spool or mini spool. I just wish I'd hear more from others that have switched and what they are using (Currie/Strange....ETC?) I've ran an Auburn posi in my '82 GMC...love it. No complaints.

Thanks
Joel C
huskerala is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
motor
General Discussion
8
June 18th, 2013 05:50 PM
dre
Drivetrain/Differentials
3
August 31st, 2011 11:04 AM
jdiggitydogg
Cutlass
8
January 25th, 2011 08:37 AM



Quick Reply: Keep the type O or change



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:10 PM.