Jet-a-way Limitations
Jet-a-way Limitations
I am gearing up for a resto on my 65 F-85 Cutlass Convertable. I am debating the resto-rod/original dilemma. The car has a 330 hi comp 310 hp engine so if I wanted to go with a higher hp motor or rebuild what would be the limits of the Jet a way 2 speed trans? I believe I have heard these are great drag strip transmissions, so are they strong stock or are they building them up for racing?
Thanks to all--great site.
Thanks to all--great site.
I am gearing up for a resto on my 65 F-85 Cutlass Convertable. I am debating the resto-rod/original dilemma. The car has a 330 hi comp 310 hp engine so if I wanted to go with a higher hp motor or rebuild what would be the limits of the Jet a way 2 speed trans? I believe I have heard these are great drag strip transmissions, so are they strong stock or are they building them up for racing?
Thanks to all--great site.
Thanks to all--great site.
Match to a rear gear that will have your engine taching out at the end of a quarter mile ...
Last edited by mugzilla; Nov 11, 2009 at 09:37 AM.
The Jetaway WAS used behind the Olds 400 motor in the 65-66 442s.
A two speed trans is going to limit you. Have you checked out what gearhead78 has done to his car its one good example how to set up a mid 60's Cutlass with a 330, and he would answer any questions you have, and has a lot of information about his car on the site.
Last edited by 70 cutlass s; Nov 11, 2009 at 11:26 AM.
Joe,
I am sure you are correct about the powerglide. I assumed that the GM 2 speeds from that era were the same with just the name being different (powerglide vs jetaway) Seems people are not too hot on the jetaways. I like it. It is certainly different to have a 2 speed car. I undersand it is not a real wheel spinner but it has been in the car for 44 years now with no rebuild that I know of. Still shifts real solid.What was the HP and torque on the 400 in 65?
I am sure you are correct about the powerglide. I assumed that the GM 2 speeds from that era were the same with just the name being different (powerglide vs jetaway) Seems people are not too hot on the jetaways. I like it. It is certainly different to have a 2 speed car. I undersand it is not a real wheel spinner but it has been in the car for 44 years now with no rebuild that I know of. Still shifts real solid.What was the HP and torque on the 400 in 65?
I think your going to find that the jetaway trans is amazingly expensive to build. I just had one done for a dynamic 88. After the fact I wish I had sent a turbo 400 case out and had it modified. I dont remember the fellows name that modifys the cases, but I know he can do a 400 or even a 700r4/4l60e if you want. I think it would have driven/functioned much more nicely. I do know that the floor needs to be clearanced for a t-400
If you want to keep the car correct then rebuilt the trans but if you want it to haul @#% then get something else...I had a jetaway (super turbine 300) in my 65 Cutlass rebuilt in 1975 thinking I could beef it up...Nope...
My 442 still has its ST300...gonna rebuild/freshen it up it to keep it correct...but I dont expect too much out of it other than reliability...
My 442 still has its ST300...gonna rebuild/freshen it up it to keep it correct...but I dont expect too much out of it other than reliability...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



