Center Link? - 1970 Cutlass Supreme
Center Link? - 1970 Cutlass Supreme
I'm in the midst of a frame off resto of my '70 Cutlass Supreme. 20+ years ago (25K miles) I rebuilt the entire front suspension. Everything has been disassembled, cleaned, painted. Ball joints replaced, bushings, ect. again. The center link had a small piece of plastic starting to come out of the stud area, MAW replace it. I ordered a Moog DS -749. It doesn't fit,, it's close but upon comparing the old one (that fit) the boss area where the studs that go into the Pitman arm and Idler arm are 1/8" taller, plus it's 1/16" thicker which should be better. This causes interference where the centerlink moves across the frame "snout". Actually, I'd have to draw it in with the nuts and that's unacceptable. I tried a different brand and same result.
This is a simple stock rebuild so nothing's exotic. My parts guys are at a loss.
Has anyone encountered this issue?
Appreciate any input. K. Lee
This is a simple stock rebuild so nothing's exotic. My parts guys are at a loss.
Has anyone encountered this issue?
Appreciate any input. K. Lee
I fully rebuilt my '72 Cutlass suspension in 2016 right after purchase - much of it still appeared original to the car. Replaced everything with Moog replacement parts where available (including a DS749 center link) and didn't encounter any problem. Are you mixing original parts with replacements? Possibly the new center link would be more compatible with other new connecting parts?
these are some of the items I installed:
Moog DS749 Center Link
Moog Tie Rod Ends ES406R (outer) and ES406L (inner)
ES2004S - Moog Tie Rod Sleeves
Moog Replacement Idler Arm K5143
My pitman arm came from CPP since it didn't appear Moog offered one
Just a shot in the dark on this idea.
these are some of the items I installed:
Moog DS749 Center Link
Moog Tie Rod Ends ES406R (outer) and ES406L (inner)
ES2004S - Moog Tie Rod Sleeves
Moog Replacement Idler Arm K5143
My pitman arm came from CPP since it didn't appear Moog offered one
Just a shot in the dark on this idea.
Last edited by 70sgeek; Aug 21, 2019 at 06:49 PM.
Thanks for the responses everyone.
70sgeek, the only original part of the steering is the steering box and Pitman arm and the steering box can only go on one way and has not been modified in any way. I took it off to clean and paint. The idler is a replacement from the rebuild 20 years ago, sadly I didn't save the receipt. It has a number stamped on it which I'll get today. and some pictures.
When I attempt to install the CL (ctr. link) in the Pitman arm the middle hits the frame snout and would bind if I drew it tight with the nuts.
There is a physical difference in the replacement (which fits) and the new Moog DS-749, not much, but enough to cause my problem. Nothing stamped on the old CL.
I don't know how many thousands of GM A body frames were build but if there's a quirk I'm the guy that gets it, lol. I'll just have to keep digging.
Thanks again , K. Lee
70sgeek, the only original part of the steering is the steering box and Pitman arm and the steering box can only go on one way and has not been modified in any way. I took it off to clean and paint. The idler is a replacement from the rebuild 20 years ago, sadly I didn't save the receipt. It has a number stamped on it which I'll get today. and some pictures.
When I attempt to install the CL (ctr. link) in the Pitman arm the middle hits the frame snout and would bind if I drew it tight with the nuts.
There is a physical difference in the replacement (which fits) and the new Moog DS-749, not much, but enough to cause my problem. Nothing stamped on the old CL.
I don't know how many thousands of GM A body frames were build but if there's a quirk I'm the guy that gets it, lol. I'll just have to keep digging.
Thanks again , K. Lee
I had a issue with Moog center links approx 4 years back as they did not fit ( bent a little wrong ).
Went to another auto part store bought another, with the same issue.
Went to a third store, and don't know why, other than this made no seance and bought a Duralast link that fit.
Returned both Moog's
I think Moog had a bad production run.
Went to another auto part store bought another, with the same issue.
Went to a third store, and don't know why, other than this made no seance and bought a Duralast link that fit.
Returned both Moog's
I think Moog had a bad production run.
I had a issue with Moog center links approx 4 years back as they did not fit ( bent a little wrong ).
Went to another auto part store bought another, with the same issue.
Went to a third store, and don't know why, other than this made no seance and bought a Duralast link that fit.
Returned both Moog's
I think Moog had a bad production run.
Went to another auto part store bought another, with the same issue.
Went to a third store, and don't know why, other than this made no seance and bought a Duralast link that fit.
Returned both Moog's
I think Moog had a bad production run.
You probably know this, but if not...
You will need to take the idler arm loose from the frame in order to clear engine crossmember. Once the centerlink and tie rods are drawn into the tapers, then attach the idler arm.
You will need to take the idler arm loose from the frame in order to clear engine crossmember. Once the centerlink and tie rods are drawn into the tapers, then attach the idler arm.
Center Link ?
For the curious I'll post some pics of the dilemma with the center link. One of my parts guys is ordering a new Federal Mogul CL that's supposed to be here Saturday. They brought up a concern. They said it looks like it's not a solid piece and the ends are welded on next to the tie rod end hole. I'm guessing that's acceptable in today's manufacturing processes?

The new Moog CL. In the box is where it hits, the arrow points where the stud is not even seated. Tightening the nut makes it even worse.

The old CL, tons of clearance and the stud is fully seated in the Pitman arm.
The new Moog CL. In the box is where it hits, the arrow points where the stud is not even seated. Tightening the nut makes it even worse.
The old CL, tons of clearance and the stud is fully seated in the Pitman arm.
- IMG_20190822_130321.jpg
1.9MB
The new CL fully seated in the Pitman arm, but the CL is swung away from the X member.
If I'm correct, the pivot in the CL are designed only for "circular motion" not "omni directional" such as a ball joint, correct?
If I'm doing something wrong I'll openly admit it here. What is baffling is, the old one fits fine and is not sloppy at all hopefully ruling out "it's worn out, that's why it fits easy"
Thanks to everyone with suggestions.
How to post pictures
https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...images-132664/
https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...images-132664/
I used one of these a few years ago on my 70 supreme. No issues what so ever.
https://www.napaonline.com/en/p/PCQD...ut=center+link
Pretty much the same number!
Pat
https://www.napaonline.com/en/p/PCQD...ut=center+link
Pretty much the same number!
Pat
“If I'm correct, the pivot in the CL are designed only for "circular motion" not "omni directional" such as a ball joint, correct?”
Correct. Apparently you have a part that is outside of print allowance. The holes in the new and old links should be close within i’d guess a 1/32” tolerance. Of course everything is made as cheap as possible these days, and even Moog falls victim to the constant cost reduction expectations and the eventual unacceptable results. My company may be doing an expensive recall for the same reason.
Correct. Apparently you have a part that is outside of print allowance. The holes in the new and old links should be close within i’d guess a 1/32” tolerance. Of course everything is made as cheap as possible these days, and even Moog falls victim to the constant cost reduction expectations and the eventual unacceptable results. My company may be doing an expensive recall for the same reason.
Cl success!
Well, I humbly admit to "operator error".
I did get the NAPA CL today and it's identical to the Moog DS749 which made me dubious. Even the parts guy questioned it.
I brought the CL to the shop and lo and behold it fit correctly. .
I called a friend to stop by, "Look over my shoulder and tell me what I'm doing wrong!" Installed the NAPA CL, fit great. He says, "get the Moog and we'll try it" he turned the Pitman arm to full rt, turn. "Now put it in the Pitman arm and force it in as far as you can", I did and hand tightened the nut, it swung over the frame snout with minimal struggle.
Finished the idler side and now have at least 1/4" clearance.
Thanks everyone for the reply's and advice.
Now,, if you'll excuse me I'm going to eat some Crow with Humble Pie for dessert.
Well, I humbly admit to "operator error".
I did get the NAPA CL today and it's identical to the Moog DS749 which made me dubious. Even the parts guy questioned it.
I brought the CL to the shop and lo and behold it fit correctly. .
I called a friend to stop by, "Look over my shoulder and tell me what I'm doing wrong!" Installed the NAPA CL, fit great. He says, "get the Moog and we'll try it" he turned the Pitman arm to full rt, turn. "Now put it in the Pitman arm and force it in as far as you can", I did and hand tightened the nut, it swung over the frame snout with minimal struggle.
Finished the idler side and now have at least 1/4" clearance.
Thanks everyone for the reply's and advice.
Now,, if you'll excuse me I'm going to eat some Crow with Humble Pie for dessert.
Don’t sweat it. Everyone makes mistakes. I’ve made plenty. But the good news is that with each mistake, you get a little bit wiser. Good judgement comes from bad judgement as they say.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mr mojo
Suspension & Handling
19
Jul 21, 2010 05:43 AM



