1968 Cutlass and 442 Rear Upper Control Arms - What is the difference?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old October 7th, 2018, 06:38 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Tjohn8573's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Rosemount, MN
Posts: 217
1968 Cutlass and 442 Rear Upper Control Arms - What is the difference?

I see in the 1968 assembly manual that there are different part numbers for rear upper control arms for the Cutlass and the 442 model. Can anyone tell me what the differences are between them?

Thanks,
Tim
Tjohn8573 is offline  
Old October 8th, 2018, 02:56 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
rob1960's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 845
The parts book lists different bushings for the front of the rear arms & since GM only supplied the arms with bushings,the book lists 2 part #s for the arms also. 442,vistas & police take one bushing (probably a stiffer HD bushing),regular F85/cutlasses take another part #. I don't think there is a difference in the actual arm itself,unless the car was built in Canada. The parts book lists a different upper arm for the Canada cars that came with chevy 12 bolts. All the parts vendors seem to sell just one bushing that fits all locations on the rear suspension.
rob1960 is offline  
Old October 8th, 2018, 08:30 AM
  #3  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,311
Originally Posted by rob1960
The parts book lists different bushings for the front of the rear arms & since GM only supplied the arms with bushings,the book lists 2 part #s for the arms also. 442,vistas & police take one bushing (probably a stiffer HD bushing),regular F85/cutlasses take another part #. I don't think there is a difference in the actual arm itself,unless the car was built in Canada. The parts book lists a different upper arm for the Canada cars that came with chevy 12 bolts. All the parts vendors seem to sell just one bushing that fits all locations on the rear suspension.
^^^THIS.

The stamped metal arms are the same for all Type O axles, but the different part numbers are for the arm assembly that includes the rubber bushing. The 442 used a stiffer bushing from the factory. Unfortunately, the replacements are all the same.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old October 8th, 2018, 10:59 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
v8al's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 731
Did any Oldsmobile's with the FE2 suspension (i.e. 442's) get the rear upper control arms with the additional reinforcement? See pic below.

v8al is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Toms cutlass
General Questions
58
April 27th, 2020 07:40 PM
cbartonbrown
General Discussion
12
October 7th, 2019 08:26 AM
craig442
Chassis/Body/Frame
1
April 2nd, 2019 05:55 AM
1968_Post
Suspension & Handling
4
August 27th, 2013 07:40 AM
Doug in SD
Suspension & Handling
2
June 24th, 2011 06:25 AM



Quick Reply: 1968 Cutlass and 442 Rear Upper Control Arms - What is the difference?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:05 PM.