1967 convertible frame interchange.

Old Oct 17, 2024 | 02:47 PM
  #1  
wr1970's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,645
1967 convertible frame interchange.

Will different year cutlass convertible frames interchange with a 1967 convertible? What about other GM convertible frame's interchange for a Cutlass convertible. As in the chassis frame. Anyone Joe Padavano?

Last edited by wr1970; Oct 17, 2024 at 05:46 PM.
Old Oct 19, 2024 | 06:19 AM
  #2  
Loaded68W34's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 1,942
From: Pennsylvania
I can tell you that 64-67 Chevy, Buick, and Pontiac A-body frames will NOT directly swap over to your 67 Cutlass. The main difference between the olds A-body frames and oll other GM A-body frames is the front frame horns. 67 Olds has front horns that get wider at the front to accomodate the radiator support.


I think 65 and 66 Olds A-body may have also used the wider frame horns, but I am not sure. If 64-66 olds A-body frames have the wider front frame horns they will also work.

All of the other 64-67 A-bodies (Pontiac, Chevy, Buick) used straight front frame horns which would need to be cut off to have 67 front horns welded on. Chevy frames are also about 3" shorter in the rear frame rails that run next to the gas tank than Pontiac, Buick, or Olds. This makes the Chevy and Olds frames unique


The rear upper spring cups are also unique to 67 frames. 67 A-bodies used rear srings with a small pig tail at the top. While the earlier 64-66 A-body frames used a spring that had the large diameter the whole way to the top. This is an easy fix as you can just use the correct year springs for the frame you have. You can use a hardtop frame under a convertible, but if you do not add the boxes to the frame rails, you will lose a lot of strength.
Old Oct 19, 2024 | 07:03 AM
  #3  
wr1970's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,645
Originally Posted by Loaded68W34
I can tell you that 64-67 Chevy, Buick, and Pontiac A-body frames will NOT directly swap over to your 67 Cutlass. The main difference between the olds A-body frames and oll other GM A-body frames is the front frame horns. 67 Olds has front horns that get wider at the front to accomodate the radiator support.


I think 65 and 66 Olds A-body may have also used the wider frame horns, but I am not sure. If 64-66 olds A-body frames have the wider front frame horns they will also work.

All of the other 64-67 A-bodies (Pontiac, Chevy, Buick) used straight front frame horns which would need to be cut off to have 67 front horns welded on. Chevy frames are also about 3" shorter in the rear frame rails that run next to the gas tank than Pontiac, Buick, or Olds. This makes the Chevy and Olds frames unique


The rear upper spring cups are also unique to 67 frames. 67 A-bodies used rear srings with a small pig tail at the top. While the earlier 64-66 A-body frames used a spring that had the large diameter the whole way to the top. This is an easy fix as you can just use the correct year springs for the frame you have. You can use a hardtop frame under a convertible, but if you do not add the boxes to the frame rails, you will lose a lot of strength.
so the 66 does interchange but you need 66 springs. On the rear
Old Oct 19, 2024 | 07:20 AM
  #4  
Loaded68W34's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 1,942
From: Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by wr1970
so the 66 does interchange but you need 66 springs. On the rear
I am not sure. Like I said, I think 65 and 66 might use the same style front frame horns. I have not owned a 4, 5, or 6 cutlass so I cannot be sure. If you can confirm that 66 Cutlass used the same style front frame horns as the 67, then yes, you would just need to use 66 style rear springs to put a 66 frame under your 67.
Old Oct 19, 2024 | 10:27 AM
  #5  
2blu442's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 529
One thing about the frame rails being different is Olds went to side tank radiators before other GM cars. If the 1966 used a top tank radiator, then it won't interchange. But if the 1966 used the side tanks it likely would. I've got a 1966 but it's been at the paint shop for so long I don't remember which it has.
Old Oct 19, 2024 | 10:30 AM
  #6  
2blu442's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 529
If you get into a pinch trying to find a frame, the Vista Cruiser also has a fully boxed frame like the convertible. It would take some work, but the front half of the Vista Cruiser frame could be spliced onto the convertible frame. Just a thought to have more options for your search.
Old Oct 20, 2024 | 08:20 AM
  #7  
wr1970's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,645
Originally Posted by 2blu442
If you get into a pinch trying to find a frame, the Vista Cruiser also has a fully boxed frame like the convertible. It would take some work, but the front half of the Vista Cruiser frame could be spliced onto the convertible frame. Just a thought to have more options for your search.
It's not for me . Had a guy tell me there is no interchange for a 1967 Cutlass convertible frame. I know they made a boxing kit that you can weld in for GM frame's. So you can use a 1967 Cutlass frame on a convertible.
Old Oct 22, 2024 | 05:21 PM
  #8  
jmcghee's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 603
From: New Castle De
64 ,65 wil not work. No way, front frame rails are narrower
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KcPaul
Parts Wanted
4
Oct 24, 2024 11:07 AM
442stevetx
The Newbie Forum
2
Aug 24, 2024 03:10 AM
Mr. Matchmynumbers
Parts Wanted
1
Nov 17, 2020 09:08 AM
67Ragtop
General Discussion
0
Dec 6, 2018 01:30 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:10 PM.