olds 76 442 455
#42
Normally used in reply to a question that was answered previously. Not the case here. In the context of this thread, why did you use it?
Rhetorical. The Firefox browser has a built in spell checker, for those of us who need a little help in that area.
Rhetorical question = one that does not need an answer?
In the interests of accurate communication, I respond to what is actually written, not to my perception of the poster's intent. To that end, any question that is asked, deserves the courtesy of my honest answer.
Further, in venues like this, rhetorical questions often inhibit the very communications that are needed to make the system work. You are looking at an example.
Are you having trouble with your CAPS LOCK KEY?
When we get to it.
Right now, we are dealing with the more “important” parts of your post, so we will be on the same page when we do.
Norm
Rhetorical. The Firefox browser has a built in spell checker, for those of us who need a little help in that area.
Rhetorical question = one that does not need an answer?
In the interests of accurate communication, I respond to what is actually written, not to my perception of the poster's intent. To that end, any question that is asked, deserves the courtesy of my honest answer.
Further, in venues like this, rhetorical questions often inhibit the very communications that are needed to make the system work. You are looking at an example.
Are you having trouble with your CAPS LOCK KEY?
When we get to it.
Right now, we are dealing with the more “important” parts of your post, so we will be on the same page when we do.
Norm
#43
go away 88
man what are you about 5' 4" with 2" below the waist. that can't even tell if there is a clutch pedal in a car. you are as aggervating as a redneck ford man. what! do you think that you have the only fast car on the block. as for everyone else I appreciate all your help and info and look forward to talking to you more. but i wouldn't let that 88 guy even have an ebay account much less username on a classic car web site. and anyway 88 what kind of #s does your car run I mean i assume you have one with a motor in it!
Normally used in reply to a question that was answered previously. Not the case here. In the context of this thread, why did you use it?
Rhetorical. The Firefox browser has a built in spell checker, for those of us who need a little help in that area.
Rhetorical question = one that does not need an answer?
In the interests of accurate communication, I respond to what is actually written, not to my perception of the poster's intent. To that end, any question that is asked, deserves the courtesy of my honest answer.
Further, in venues like this, rhetorical questions often inhibit the very communications that are needed to make the system work. You are looking at an example.
Are you having trouble with your CAPS LOCK KEY?
When we get to it.
Right now, we are dealing with the more “important” parts of your post, so we will be on the same page when we do.
Norm
Rhetorical. The Firefox browser has a built in spell checker, for those of us who need a little help in that area.
Rhetorical question = one that does not need an answer?
In the interests of accurate communication, I respond to what is actually written, not to my perception of the poster's intent. To that end, any question that is asked, deserves the courtesy of my honest answer.
Further, in venues like this, rhetorical questions often inhibit the very communications that are needed to make the system work. You are looking at an example.
Are you having trouble with your CAPS LOCK KEY?
When we get to it.
Right now, we are dealing with the more “important” parts of your post, so we will be on the same page when we do.
Norm
#45
Normally used in reply to a question that was answered previously. Not the case here. In the context of this thread, why did you use it?
Rhetorical. The Firefox browser has a built in spell checker, for those of us who need a little help in that area.
Rhetorical question = one that does not need an answer?
In the interests of accurate communication, I respond to what is actually written, not to my perception of the poster's intent. To that end, any question that is asked, deserves the courtesy of my honest answer.
Further, in venues like this, rhetorical questions often inhibit the very communications that are needed to make the system work. You are looking at an example.
Are you having trouble with your CAPS LOCK KEY?
When we get to it.
Right now, we are dealing with the more “important” parts of your post, so we will be on the same page when we do.
Norm
Rhetorical. The Firefox browser has a built in spell checker, for those of us who need a little help in that area.
Rhetorical question = one that does not need an answer?
In the interests of accurate communication, I respond to what is actually written, not to my perception of the poster's intent. To that end, any question that is asked, deserves the courtesy of my honest answer.
Further, in venues like this, rhetorical questions often inhibit the very communications that are needed to make the system work. You are looking at an example.
Are you having trouble with your CAPS LOCK KEY?
When we get to it.
Right now, we are dealing with the more “important” parts of your post, so we will be on the same page when we do.
Norm
#46
man what are you about 5' 4" with 2" below the waist. that can't even tell if there is a clutch pedal in a car. you are as aggervating as a redneck ford man. what! do you think that you have the only fast car on the block. as for everyone else I appreciate all your help and info and look forward to talking to you more. but i wouldn't let that 88 guy even have an ebay account much less username on a classic car web site. and anyway 88 what kind of #s does your car run I mean i assume you have one with a motor in it!
No problem tower. Some of us like to help. Others just like to flex their ego.
#47
Here it is again:
If you look closely, you will see a “( ? )” after “retoricle”.
Perfect definition of irony: The post was about accurate communication, and the reply had nothing to do with anything.
Norm
Perfect definition of irony: The post was about accurate communication, and the reply had nothing to do with anything.
Norm
#48
Thats right, just keep changing the subject and trying to make yourself look good. You would make a good politition or cop. You do not like to be corrected. You are so quick to jump someone and correct them. You can dish it out but you cannot take it. Probably why you can`t hang with the big boys over on ROP. I admit I spelled a word wrong. Whoopity do. Note the counter clockwise rotation of the right index finger. Now waste more time dancing around the fact that you opened your trap and not your eyes.
#49
Nothing to do with your spelling of the word. Everything to do with the “( sp? )” you followed it with.
You already said as much when you posted it. Makes your false show of attrition pretty transparent, don't you think?
Here it is again:
“( sp? )” = Two parts = “sp” and “?”.
“sp” = spelling, and “?” = question.
“spelling” + “question” = “Is this spelled correctly?”
A simple answer to a legitimate question.
Along with my source for the correct spelling.
And the reason for posting it.
Why have you tried to “spin” a simple statement into a false accusation?
Norm
You already said as much when you posted it. Makes your false show of attrition pretty transparent, don't you think?
Here it is again:
“sp” = spelling, and “?” = question.
“spelling” + “question” = “Is this spelled correctly?”
A simple answer to a legitimate question.
Along with my source for the correct spelling.
And the reason for posting it.
Why have you tried to “spin” a simple statement into a false accusation?
Norm
#50
Blah blah blah. You sound like a broken record. I`ve made no false accusations or tried to spin anything. It`s very clear who is trying to spin it. I call it like it is and stand by everything I`ve said. You keep bringing up the same ole crap and trying to avoid the fact that you opened your mouth instead of your eyes. I called you out on it and you have done nothing but avoid it in every post you`ve made. If it were a simple mistake it would have been no problem and I would have never said anything.
#51
Nothing of the kind: You asked a question, I answered it.
Tell us how, in context, this is not an accusatory statement.
Then tell us why, it is not a classic example of "spin", as practiced by a rank amateur.
Finally, tell us why you continue to avoid discussing your own statements.
Norm
#52
I think this is where it started.
Norm gave his opinion.
If you don't agree fine. His posting style has been discussed before, old subject.
Let this one die folks.
....the car looks to be the equivalent of a Honda with a "wing" and a "fart pipe"
Let this one die folks.
Last edited by Oldsguy; March 12th, 2008 at 05:16 AM.
#53
Here it is again:
And I continued:
I will make this as simple as I know how:
Nothing of the kind: You asked a question, I answered it.
Tell us how, in context, this is not an accusatory statement.
Then tell us why, it is not a classic example of "spin", as practiced by a rank amateur.
Finally, tell us why you continue to avoid discussing your own statements.
Norm
And I continued:
I will make this as simple as I know how:
Nothing of the kind: You asked a question, I answered it.
Tell us how, in context, this is not an accusatory statement.
Then tell us why, it is not a classic example of "spin", as practiced by a rank amateur.
Finally, tell us why you continue to avoid discussing your own statements.
Norm
(sp?) does not mean I`m asking for yours or anyone elses help on the spelling. It is RHETORICAL just like the original post about you having a bad day.
Now I hope we`ve cleared that part up. I made it simple enough so even you, Norm could understand it.
I am man enough to own up and accept my mistakes. Are you ?
I noticed you don`t post on some of the other Olds boards anymore. You could`nt hang with the big boys on ROP ? Now that is a question.
#54
While i agree with oldsguy and we should just let this one die, im far too interested in this argument to share his hopes. Now please note that i know next to nothing about cars so i am in no way offering any opinion, expertise or any other mechanical advice. All im interested in is whether or not Norm is right about the tranny. I know from reading his posts that he knows more about cars than many of us and more than i will ever hope to know, BUT i also know norm has a unique posting style which tends to agitate some people. Usually when people get "Normed"(labeled as such in another post some of you may be fimiliar with) he calls them on everything labelled or described incorrectly and gives his opinion on the subject in his typical Norm fashion. This time, however, there may be a chance he was mistaken about the shifter/tranny being automatic*. This would be the first time I have heard Norm rant about something and be mistaken about it, and i wouldnt want this thread to die until i find out for sure
* Not meaning it was a true "rock crusher" (whatever that is), just him saying it was auto when its manual.
* Not meaning it was a true "rock crusher" (whatever that is), just him saying it was auto when its manual.
#55
I may miss spell a word or two here and there. I am not perfect. I am only human and I don`t care what others think. If thats the worst you can think of me then I`m not doing too bad.
I am done. I think I`ve proven my point.
Dennis
#57
By the way, am I the only one here that sees a clutch pedal and knows what a reverse lock out lever is for ? I would think if one was to go around and correct everyone all the time and claim to have all this knowledge, I would at least know what the heck those are.
#58
Yes Dan,
I believe the horse died, when DennisG replied to the part that I did not write.
This one speaks for itself.
And it is an excellent place to let it die.
Norm
I believe the horse died, when DennisG replied to the part that I did not write.
And it is an excellent place to let it die.
Norm
Last edited by 88 coupe; March 13th, 2008 at 07:08 PM.
#59
I can't believe I came here to find info for a 8.9 car. And had to here all this crap about a piece of junk 10 or 11 sec. Car from a arrogant *** that can't see a clutch pedal.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SKINNY IL
Parts For Sale
12
May 14th, 2010 07:12 AM
BigBertha442
442
4
September 2nd, 2008 09:23 PM
BigBertha442
Cars For Sale
1
August 23rd, 2008 08:24 PM