Cars For Sale Please read forum guidelines before posting.

68 ram rod

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 16, 2015 | 06:31 AM
  #1  
66-3X2 442's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,202
From: Birmingham,Alabama
68 ram rod

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Oldsmobile-4...m=301633398331
Old May 16, 2015 | 07:36 AM
  #2  
Joffroi's Avatar
Runner
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,713
From: Ballwin, MO
Wow, that's a great looking car.
Old May 16, 2015 | 07:58 AM
  #3  
Octania's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,286
That's not a W31!

see the photographer in the wheel cover!

$27,350 and reserve not met

I suggest that you right-click and SAVE these photos for your collection. The links will not stay viable here forever.

"Up for auction, 1968 Oldsmobile Cutlass S W-31 Ram Rod .One of 5 Shipped to GM of Canada , and 1 of 106 Built . Fully Documented with paperwork from GM of Canada . All Numbers matching !Engine ( Carb to Pan) ,Muncie 4sp Trans , and 3.42 Posi Rear. Complete Body off Restoration, New Paint , interior , exhaust , brakes , tires .The 350 cu in 325 Hp engine and 4 Speed Muncie Trans have less then 1,500 miles since the rebuild . The car has only 65,451 original miles .Very rare color combo , Nocturne blue with light blue interior , body is laser straight and the paint has and outstanding luster .Fully detailed and show ready , this car runs and drives like new , Needs nothing ! Getting harder to find in original form and in this condition .Please feel free to ask any questions , or leave message on cell 631-873-9306 Gary .Good luck bidding and thanks for looking .Very reasonable reserve*

On May-15-15 at 09:41:56 PDT, seller added the following information:
This is a Real Deal -----Not a clone , Not a tribute , The real Thing ........Very Rare and documented .....Rare opportunity to acquire one that has not been altered from its original assembly ."






Last edited by Octania; May 16, 2015 at 08:02 AM.
Old May 16, 2015 | 08:11 AM
  #4  
66trakpak's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 423
From: Long Island NY
Chris this is my car and please explain to me why you say this is not a w31 when I have all Canadian documents that use the w31 call out. The car is as real and correct as it gets
Old May 16, 2015 | 08:19 AM
  #5  
Trophyblue442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 461
From: Long Island, NY
I have personally seen the car and the DOCUMENTATION this is a REAL W31 ramrod. Octania it is a shame you would make the claim of it not being real without knowing the facts. What is even funnier is that last year you even acknowledged this car was a real W31 ramrod. I think an apology is in order to 66trakpak
Old May 16, 2015 | 09:05 AM
  #6  
tru-blue 442's Avatar
Old School Olds
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 9,272
From: Marble Falls TX
Easy guys, I think he was just funni'n. Beautiful car 66. GLWS.
Old May 16, 2015 | 09:13 AM
  #7  
66trakpak's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 423
From: Long Island NY
Originally Posted by tru-blue 442
Easy guys, I think he was just funni'n. Beautiful car 66. GLWS.
I don't find humor in false allegations about a car I'm selling. But thank you for your nice comment on the car.

Last edited by 66trakpak; May 16, 2015 at 09:16 AM.
Old May 16, 2015 | 09:14 AM
  #8  
tru-blue 442's Avatar
Old School Olds
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 9,272
From: Marble Falls TX
No problem, it is quite stunning!
Old May 16, 2015 | 09:54 AM
  #9  
66-3X2 442's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,202
From: Birmingham,Alabama
Chris,you're on thin ice here with your constant expertise on cars you know nothing about. This car is a fully documented 68 W-31 Ram Rod. The Canadian docs show the W-31 option. You come across as a clown sometimes and should really put some thought in your comments.
Old May 16, 2015 | 10:02 AM
  #10  
66-3X2 442's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,202
From: Birmingham,Alabama
Originally Posted by tru-blue 442
Easy guys, I think he was just funni'n. Beautiful car 66. GLWS.
Nothing funny about making a false comment about a car that's the real deal. Chris likes to be a expert and class comedienne @ the same time. The guy who owns this car is not happy with him @ all. You never know who might be reading these comments from Rodney Dangerfield and be a prospective buyer @ the same time.
Old May 16, 2015 | 10:19 AM
  #11  
Diego's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,625
Not trying to add to the humor, just to be clear, but aren't the production numbers listed in the auction actually for the 1969 W-31 Cutlass S Sports Coupe?

Last edited by Diego; May 16, 2015 at 02:37 PM.
Old May 16, 2015 | 11:51 AM
  #12  
morepwr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 139
From: Ventura, Ca
I enjoyed looking at the photos in the Ebay ad. What a stunning car! I cant say I have ever seen that color in person and I wish you the best of luck in the sale.
Old May 16, 2015 | 12:21 PM
  #13  
BangScreech4-4-2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 16,744
Looks legit to me! And very nice. Best of luck.
Old May 16, 2015 | 02:03 PM
  #14  
66trakpak's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 423
From: Long Island NY
Thank you
Old May 16, 2015 | 04:50 PM
  #15  
Stefano's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,786
From: Land of Lincoln
Kool Ram Rod, good luck with the sale.
Old May 16, 2015 | 05:00 PM
  #16  
oldsmobiledave's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 3,688
From: Delta BC Canada
Nice

Awesome car. Love your decision to go with redlines over the correct white wall tires. Best of luck with the sale. Lucky the man who owns it next.
Old May 16, 2015 | 05:34 PM
  #17  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 42,521
From: Poteau, Ok
Sweet ride, looks well worth the price.
Old May 16, 2015 | 05:43 PM
  #18  
66trakpak's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 423
From: Long Island NY
Originally Posted by oldcutlass
Sweet ride, looks well worth the price.
Thanks all for the nice comments. It does hurt me to sell this car, and am only doing so because I just bought a certain red 66 442 that was parked next to you in the North Texas zone meet recently. Whoever ends up with this car will be very happy I'm sure.
Old May 16, 2015 | 05:49 PM
  #19  
Ctls442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,493
From: Orland Park, IL
Beautiful paint, and car overall. I noticed extra cost "wheel discs" on the window sticker. I thought the buyer received the dog dish caps when no optional wheel covers/wheels were ordered. In this case, the dog dish caps were an option?

Good luck with the sale.
Old May 16, 2015 | 05:57 PM
  #20  
66trakpak's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 423
From: Long Island NY
Originally Posted by Ctls442
Beautiful paint, and car overall. I noticed extra cost "wheel discs" on the window sticker. I thought the buyer received the dog dish caps when no optional wheel covers/wheels were ordered. In this case, the dog dish caps were an option?

Good luck with the sale.
No I have the wheel disks but preferred the poverty cap look.
Old May 16, 2015 | 06:14 PM
  #21  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 42,521
From: Poteau, Ok
Originally Posted by 66trakpak
Thanks all for the nice comments. It does hurt me to sell this car, and am only doing so because I just bought a certain red 66 442 that was parked next to you in the North Texas zone meet recently. Whoever ends up with this car will be very happy I'm sure.
No $h1t...didn't know it was for sale. That's a car with some history, huge congrats!
Old May 16, 2015 | 06:20 PM
  #22  
66trakpak's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 423
From: Long Island NY
Originally Posted by oldcutlass
No $h1t...didn't know it was for sale. That's a car with some history, huge congrats!
Yes it does thank you very much.
Old May 16, 2015 | 06:50 PM
  #23  
72xw30's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 573
From: Ontario, Canada
Wow!!!
Beautiful car!
I wish.

Cheers,
Sam
Old May 16, 2015 | 07:12 PM
  #24  
ent72olds's Avatar
Registered Luser
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,785
From: LI,NY
Thumbs up

This car is as beautiful in person as it is in photos! Very impressive. Awesome color combo! The work is virtually flawless on the body. The guy who buys this will not be disappointed!
Old May 16, 2015 | 07:21 PM
  #25  
66trakpak's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 423
From: Long Island NY
Originally Posted by ent72olds
This car is as beautiful in person as it is in photos! Very impressive. Awesome color combo! The work is virtually flawless on the body. The guy who buys this will not be disappointed!
Thanks Erik, I really appreciate that. I hope it goes to a really good home, it deserves it.
Old May 16, 2015 | 07:57 PM
  #26  
Octania's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,286
Originally Posted by tru-blue 442
Easy guys, I think he was just funni'n. Beautiful car 66. GLWS.
I think an apology is in order to 66trakpak
================================

ooooh i thought that would get a comment or two and some education slapped upside my head, but did not think about affecting a sale. To 66trakpak and any others slighted, please accept my apologies. I was urging folks to save the photos because it is a stunning example. Surely you can see that.

It was said tongue in cheek, expecting the backlash, with my feeble argument to be on the grounds that prior to 1968 they were called "Ram Rods" and only that.

For the record, I have NO doubts about this car's pedigree. No troubles or worries.

I was in a bit of a hurry and should have elaborated and stated that I expected to be caught. And corrected. I did not notice that the ad said "W31" - I just noticed "Ram Rod."

So, what with the 1968 versions being called "Ram Rod" and not *technically* W31 [or is there factory literature that states "W-31" or W31" for 1968?? this is where you all get to shoot me down...] I bounced out the assertion IN JEST that it was "not a W31 (because they were called Ram Rod at that time)..."

I do apologize for the error, and we sure don't want prospective buyers finding false or misleading info even in jest and taking that as Gospel.

So, school is in session:
for 1968, and ONLY 1968,
is the small block with OAI
1) Ram Rod only, period, or...
2) Ram Rod or W31, depending on what decal or literature is referred to?

we can rule out
3) W31 only, for the fender decal says "Ram Rod"

I realllllly do appreciate you fellers, and was in fact composing a big Thank You to all who come here to help and enjoy the comraderie and Talk Olds. Here, I just wanted to 1) bring the photos and text, and 2) spur discusson about the Ram Rod vs W31 naming issue for pre-69 models.

Last edited by Octania; May 16, 2015 at 08:05 PM.
Old May 16, 2015 | 09:11 PM
  #27  
z11375ss's Avatar
Senior Moment Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,240
Octania, for what it's worth I've always found you to be stand a up guy and understood your tongue in cheek comment immediately.

I suggest that you right-click and SAVE these photos for your collection. The links will not stay viable here forever.

That's the tip off. Save these pics before they're gone. I got it.

What an awesome car. Can you imagine picking this up at the dealer. I suppose you can pick it up right now if want. It's bid to 32k. Seems a little light but is getting close to value IMHO.
Old May 16, 2015 | 10:57 PM
  #28  
orange442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,142
From: Bartlesville, Oklahoma
Originally Posted by oldsmobiledave
awesome car. Love your decision to go with redlines over the correct white wall tires. Best of luck with the sale. Lucky the man who owns it next.
^^^this^^^
Old May 17, 2015 | 03:26 AM
  #29  
wr1970's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,645
Hmm how many out of 106 were post cars? This is a post car isn't it? All i know is that car would be mine if i had the cash. Very very nice car i have never seen a black one.My bad the nocturne blue looks black in the picture.

Last edited by wr1970; May 17, 2015 at 03:30 AM.
Old May 17, 2015 | 05:50 AM
  #30  
66-3X2 442's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,202
From: Birmingham,Alabama
Originally Posted by z11375ss
Octania, for what it's worth I've always found you to be stand a up guy and understood your tongue in cheek comment immediately.

I suggest that you right-click and SAVE these photos for your collection. The links will not stay viable here forever.

That's the tip off. Save these pics before they're gone. I got it.

What an awesome car. Can you imagine picking this up at the dealer. I suppose you can pick it up right now if want. It's bid to 32k. Seems a little light but is getting close to value IMHO.
I agree,Chris is always trying to help as a lot of us are and I do get his humor. When a car is for sale,that's not the time for anything that takes away from the seller unless it's called for. In this case there's nothing that needed commenting on unless like Chris said to save the pictures/info for future reference. Just as the thread about the 66 442 Club Coupe for sale @ Mecum has some statements that are not true. I have always taken the stance that I do not comment on anything for sale unless I have a stake in it. I'm always getting request from guys wanting to know what their cars are worth. I always tell them I do not put values on other guys cars because the market varies so much with many different factors. The thing I do say is something is worth what somebody is willing to pay,a cliche I know but it's the truth.
Old May 17, 2015 | 06:40 AM
  #31  
Octania's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,286
so, you technical experts... does the "W31" umbrella extend to cover the 1968 Ram Rod? If say GM of Canada docs specifically list it as W31 then I guess so. Even if the fenders assert that "Ram Rod" is the subspecies.
Old May 17, 2015 | 06:50 AM
  #32  
Trophyblue442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 461
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by Octania
so, you technical experts... does the "W31" umbrella extend to cover the 1968 Ram Rod? If say GM of Canada docs specifically list it as W31 then I guess so. Even if the fenders assert that "Ram Rod" is the subspecies.
Look at the documentation from GM of Canada in the eBay ad. It specifically calls out the W31 option.

Thanks for clearing up your thoughts on the first post as well...
Old May 17, 2015 | 08:02 AM
  #33  
66-3X2 442's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,202
From: Birmingham,Alabama
Originally Posted by joesw31
The W-31 is an option code for 1968 to 1970 "OAI 325 horse 350 engine", however, in 1968 referred as a 'ramrod', but the code for the mentioned is "W-31". This is one of the very few examples with documentation, and a fine example. Good luck with your sell.
What he said. If you had the broadcast card,it would have W-31,not Ram Rod. A mere technicality but to say it's not a W-31 is pure BS and should have never been mentioned.
Old May 17, 2015 | 08:14 AM
  #34  
Octania's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,286
Well you know me I hate to spread bullshed.

I really just wanted to spur discussion and clear up the 1968-only use of "Ram Rod" vs. "W31" with or w/o a hyphen. It was a reference only to the terminology used to descibe such a 1968 Small Block Outside Air Induction factory offering, and NOT intended to question the legitimacy of the w-ness history, nor impugn the reputation of the car or the seller.

I was preparing for a family function and in a hurry and totally FAILED to go acutally LOOK AT the other photos. As I mentioned, I even failed to see that the text, which I copied and pasted here, actually asserted "W31" - which in my mind meant that someone would start off the discussion with "He said it was a Ram Rod OAI car, not 'W31'" - leading to that point of discussion.

I failed to read the very text I was referring to
I failed to look at all the photos and docs
I failed to consider the ramifications of discussing the pedigree of a car for sale.

For these failures I again apologize. I hope you can forgive these transgressions.
It looks totally gorgeous, what a great example, and even a for-real SB OAI car.

Thanks for the education and the reminder that words should be chosen more carefully, lest things get taken the wrong way by readers not grasping the full context. I can only imagine the pedigree pounding I will have to endure should the day come to sell the '68.

Last edited by Octania; May 17, 2015 at 01:40 PM.
Old May 17, 2015 | 08:51 AM
  #35  
z11375ss's Avatar
Senior Moment Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,240
Quit beating yourself up. It's an online form for Pete's sake. Not a life/death situation.
Old May 17, 2015 | 09:03 AM
  #36  
66trakpak's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 423
From: Long Island NY
Originally Posted by Octania
Well you know me I hate to spread bullshed.

I really just wanted to spur discussion and clear up the 1968-only use of "Ram Rod" vs. "W31" with or w/o a hyphen. It was a refernce only to the terminology used to descibe such a 1968 Small Block Outside Air Induction factory offering, and NOT intended to question the legitimacy of the w-ness history, nor impugn the reputation of the car or the seller.

I was preparing for a family function and in a hurry and totally FAILED to go acutally LOOK AT the other photos. As I mentioned, I even failed to see that the text, which I copied and pasted here, actually asserted "W31" - which in my mind meant that someone would start off the discussion with "He said it was a Ram Rod OAI car, not 'W31'" - leading to that point of discussion.

I failed to read the very text I was referring to
I failed to look at all the photos and docs
I failed to consider the ramifications of discussing the pedigree of a car for sale.

For these failures I again apologize. I hope you can forgive these transgressions.
It looks totally gorgeous, what a great example, and even a for-real SB OAI car.

Thanks for the education and the reminder that words should be chosen more carefully, lest things get taken the wrong way by readers not grasping the full context. I can only imagine the pedigree pounding I will have to endure should the day come to sell the '68.
Chris, I thank you for the apologies and correction.
Old May 17, 2015 | 10:15 AM
  #37  
66-3X2 442's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,202
From: Birmingham,Alabama
Originally Posted by z11375ss
Quit beating yourself up. It's an online form for Pete's sake. Not a life/death situation.
Absolutely correct.
Old May 17, 2015 | 11:39 AM
  #38  
Diego's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,625
Originally Posted by wr1970
Hmm how many out of 106 were post cars? This is a post car isn't it?
The number quoted is for the bodystyle, but I'm still thinking it's a 1969 number.
Old May 18, 2015 | 01:04 PM
  #39  
junior supercar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,620
From: suburbs of Chicago
Originally Posted by 66-3X2 442
What he said. If you had the broadcast card,it would have W-31,not Ram Rod. A mere technicality but to say it's not a W-31 is pure BS and should have never been mentioned.
are you talking about the Fisher body Broadcast Card? For 68 and 69, they do not have W-31 on them. For 70, they did have W-31, usually in box 3 iirc.
Old May 18, 2015 | 06:33 PM
  #40  
Run to Rund's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,033
In 1968 the marketing weenies called the W30 a 400 Ram Rod and the W31 a 350 Ram Rod. By 1969 they realized that their catchy names didn't really catch on, and so they went with the option codes just like Chevy did with the L88 etc.


Some factory literature such as the list of options in the parts manuals will not be complete. For example, it won't show the early W30 or the 68 W31 options, and in 1972 it calls the W30 the W machine option.


Look at the hokey ads in 1966 done by those marketing weenies. No resemblance to the work done by Olds Engineering.
I have also seen statements which seem credible that the airflow to the ducts was better in 1968 than in 1969 because the parking lights in the 1969 bumper disrupted flow. Thus, for light weight and performance, the 1968 may have been the pinnacle for the W31. On the drag strip, the 1968 W31 got the same e.t. as the W30.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:04 PM.