Cars For Sale Please read forum guidelines before posting.

1971 convertible for sale #'s matching

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 9, 2014 | 12:37 PM
  #1  
droptopbrandon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 5
From: CA
1971 convertible for sale #'s matching

i have a 1971 cutlass im trying to auction off. 2 many projects
Old May 9, 2014 | 12:44 PM
  #2  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 42,524
From: Poteau, Ok
Do you have any more information, a price, pictures, your location?
Old May 9, 2014 | 12:52 PM
  #3  
66ninetyeightls's Avatar
Land Yacht Captain
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,727
From: Shelburne, Ontario
I’ll take it!!! Wait ummm…. No I don’t actually know ANYTHING about the car LOL

Originally Posted by droptopbrandon
i have a 1971 cutlass im trying to auction off. 2 many projects
Old May 9, 2014 | 01:00 PM
  #4  
Cman7713's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 277
From: Alsip, Il
Originally Posted by oldcutlass
Do you have any more information, a price, pictures, your location?
Second this ^ i'm looking for a new driver/project.
Old May 9, 2014 | 02:30 PM
  #5  
droptopbrandon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 5
From: CA
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sfc/cto/4453187222.html

here's the craigslist link. im located in california
559-260-5778 is my cell number
Old May 9, 2014 | 02:55 PM
  #6  
jaunty75's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,215
From: southeastern Michigan
A couple of comments:

1. You say the odometer has 15,000. Is that the mileage, or is it 115,000? If the latter, state that. If you don't know, state that. As it stands now, you are implying the car has 15,000 miles.

2. You say this about the top:

"It has a slight twelve inch tear only on outer skin, on left side upper, see pictures."

What pictures? You have exactly three photos overall, none from very close-up, and only one picture with the top up. You can't see this tear or anything in that one photo.


I suggest putting about 2 dozen more photos up. It's the age of digital photography. If you can take 3 photos, you can take 30 or 300. If you can upload 3 photos, you can upload 10 or 20 or however many craigslist allows. Take one from every angle. Lift the hood and take some of the engine. Ditto for the trunk. Take several of the interior, and get underneath.

You have a nice car, but your three measly photos don't do it justice and suggest you're trying to hide something.


Finally, what's the deal with this photo:




We see more of the empty parking space next to the car than we can see of the car itself!
Old May 9, 2014 | 03:29 PM
  #7  
droptopbrandon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 5
From: CA
i'll take that under consideration . thanks
Old May 9, 2014 | 03:49 PM
  #8  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Strong valuation for a 1971 CS vert in basically driver condition and needing some repairs. FYI the 1971 base engine was a 350 4bbl, so likely a previous owner has swapped something out on this car, as your ad says it's a 350 2bbl. If it's a prime candidate for restoration, that likely means it's in category 3 or 4 of the price guides.

I'd be interested in knowing what makes this car
'Rare Classic, Very Rare'
The Oldsmobile production statistics don't really back up your claim.
Old May 9, 2014 | 04:30 PM
  #9  
Cman7713's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 277
From: Alsip, Il
Originally Posted by jaunty75
you can upload 10 or 20 or however many craigslist allows. Take one from every angle. Lift the hood and take some of the engine. Ditto for the trunk. Take several of the interior, and get underneath.
CL allows up to 24, the only reason I know this is I just sold my car last week and posted about 15 pics.
Old May 10, 2014 | 10:58 AM
  #10  
lshlsh2's Avatar
71 cutlass convertible
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,172
From: Trappe, MD
[QUOTE=Allan R;695200]. FYI the 1971 base engine was a 350 4bbl, so likely a previous owner has swapped something out on this car, as your ad says it's a 350 2bbl.

It was probably optioned down. My came that way along with a bench seat. So I doubt anything was changed. You could option down I guess.

Larry
Old May 10, 2014 | 11:06 AM
  #11  
jaunty75's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,215
From: southeastern Michigan
Originally Posted by lshlsh2
It was probably optioned down.
The '71 Dealer Specs book supports this.

Note at the upper left under "Standard Equipment" the engine listed, as Allan says, is a 350 4-bbl. Then look low in the second column for option L65. A 350 2-bbl was offered for a $33.70 reduction in price.

Old May 10, 2014 | 11:15 AM
  #12  
Rocketbrian's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 990
From: Economy, Nova Scotia
Back in the day, when people heard it came with a 4 bbl carburetor they assumed it would use a ton of gas and would order a 2 bbl., not realizing if you kept out of the back barrels you would actually get better mileage with the 4bbl., due to the smaller front barrels of the quadrajet. They would also get a small credit on the purchase cost. However, what they didn't realize they made for a less desirable car in terms of power and driveability. I've had those two barrel carbs and they never worked as well as the quadrajet.
Old May 10, 2014 | 11:19 AM
  #13  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Larry & Dan,
Good eye guys. This is just like the 72 production then. I'd be curious to know what other options this car has, given the likelihood of a downgraded engine on its original build. It's still my opinion though that 'downgrading' the base engine to the L65 hurts the car in resale terms. The 2 bbl is still a good engine, but I've found the 4bbl's to be more powerful and fuel efficient.

Larry? You have the A65 seat? That was the 'optional' seat that was available at N/C. Again, it's JMO, but I think the CS and Cutlass S should all have been mandatory A51 Strato bucket cars. They were styled for sportiness and then were given plain jane seat options? What was Olds thinking?

EDIT: Brian - you posted while I was typing. Appears you and I have the same opinion on the engine.
Old May 10, 2014 | 03:11 PM
  #14  
droptopbrandon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 5
From: CA
i also have a 1971 convertible cutlass rolling chasis parts car. had been hit on the driver side rear quarter. bad. no seats just frame an body good floors
Old May 10, 2014 | 05:27 PM
  #15  
lshlsh2's Avatar
71 cutlass convertible
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,172
From: Trappe, MD
Larry? You have the A65 seat? That was the 'optional' seat that was available at N/C. Again, it's JMO, but I think the CS and Cutlass S should all have been mandatory A51 Strato bucket cars. They were styled for sportiness and then were given plain jane seat options? What was Olds thinking?

Allan

It seems to have a strange set of options Downgraded seats and engine.
Then Clock, Lighting package, Disc Brakes and A/C.

It came with SSI on it but don't know if they were added later, same with the 4 spoke rally steering wheel.

Larry
Old May 12, 2014 | 04:39 AM
  #16  
Magna86's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,257
From: Chesapeake, VA
If anyone is truely interested in the car I can take a look at it for you. Its only 30 mins away from me. Just throw alittle gas $$ my way since its over $4 a gal out here!
Old May 12, 2014 | 06:46 AM
  #17  
jaunty75's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,215
From: southeastern Michigan
Originally Posted by Magna86
Just throw alittle gas $$ my way since its over $4 a gal out here!
Why do you live there?

A few stations here are selling unleaded regular for $3.15/gallon.
Old May 12, 2014 | 06:53 AM
  #18  
Magna86's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,257
From: Chesapeake, VA
Because the gov't put me here. ;-) I'll be happily leaving for the east coast come the end of the year!
Old May 12, 2014 | 10:30 AM
  #19  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
IMO, neither of you have any real gas issues compared to Canada. Where I live is absolutely the lowest gas prices in all Canada and it's 4.35/US Gallon on a good day. The rest of Canada struggles with prices ranging from 4.72 to 5.67 / US gallon. Come for a visit and bring lots of gas $$$. Beautiful country to visit and live in - at a cost.
Old May 12, 2014 | 11:33 AM
  #20  
66ninetyeightls's Avatar
Land Yacht Captain
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,727
From: Shelburne, Ontario
Do I hear a little Violin Allan? lol
Old May 12, 2014 | 11:56 AM
  #21  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Naw. You got it worse out there than I do here Craig. Just letting the good folks complaining about their high prices that they're not alone. I see you guys are sitting at 5.06/US gallon at the low end right now, and your premium is a whopping 5.67/US gallon. Do you sometimes head across to NY for gas? At 4.00/US gallon it might be a cost savings but don't know about the time factor.
Old May 12, 2014 | 02:59 PM
  #22  
Hurst/Olds 73/74's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 325
I'll chime in on the 350 2V issue. My '71 Cutlass Supreme convertible is also a 350 2V car. I wish it was a Q-jet. As far as the value, I was offered $12K for mine last year and mines a driver with wear, so he may not be that far off on his asking price. Of course, I live in the rust belt where old convertibles are few and far between.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
71cutlasssx
Cars For Sale
0
Dec 3, 2013 04:38 PM
Johnd
General Discussion
7
Nov 28, 2013 08:31 AM
'71Supreme
Major Builds & Projects
14
Aug 21, 2012 05:08 PM
Al2011
General Discussion
13
Aug 10, 2011 08:58 AM
hwalzer
442
1
Mar 28, 2011 10:21 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:20 AM.