Rochester 4GC Carb - ClassicOldsmobile.com

Rochester 4GC Carb

Reply

 
 
 
Old July 1st, 2018, 11:45 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ste Rose Manitoba Canada
Posts: 159
Rochester 4GC Carb

Was looking at my 394 today that I have sitting, the carb is different that is forsure.

Pros/cons to these carbs?
Kyle's77cutlass is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old July 2nd, 2018, 10:16 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Don R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 952
They are great carbs if they are properly built with good parts. Not being in production since the 60s may make parts hard to find but definitely possible. If you are dealing with a car equipped with the Slim Jim trans they are the only carbs with the proper linkage to hook up.
Don R. is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old July 2nd, 2018, 12:14 PM
  #3  
Rocket Renegade!
 
'69442ragtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Sproat Lake, BC, Canada/Rancho Mirage, Ca.
Posts: 1,540
Square bore vs. spread bore = no interchange with later Q-Jet, if that's what you're thinking.
'69442ragtop is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old July 2nd, 2018, 05:02 PM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ste Rose Manitoba Canada
Posts: 159
Just curious. I have intentions of building a 394 one day like all other potential projects I have.
Put it in a late 30's or early 40's olds.
Cool looking carb, kinda aiming to keep the 394 old school looking.
I know nothing about Slim Jim trans, kinda kicking the idea of a standard with the 394.
Kyle's77cutlass is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old July 2nd, 2018, 06:10 PM
  #5  
Rocket Renegade!
 
'69442ragtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Sproat Lake, BC, Canada/Rancho Mirage, Ca.
Posts: 1,540
Originally Posted by Kyle's77cutlass View Post
Just curious. I have intentions of building a 394 one day like all other potential projects I have.
Put it in a late 30's or early 40's olds.
Cool looking carb, kinda aiming to keep the 394 old school looking.
I know nothing about Slim Jim trans, kinda kicking the idea of a standard with the 394.
Slim-Jim is the nickname for the Roto-Hydramatic automatic transmission. Most people stick with them in the early 60s B-bodies they came in due to clearance issues with other transmissions, but if you're planning on building an old-school hotrod there's no reason to use one. You'll end up doing plenty of fabbing anyway.
'69442ragtop is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old July 3rd, 2018, 09:48 AM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ste Rose Manitoba Canada
Posts: 159
Okay good to know.Thanks
From the island I see, hows it out there?
Kyle's77cutlass is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old July 3rd, 2018, 10:40 AM
  #7  
Rocket Renegade!
 
'69442ragtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Sproat Lake, BC, Canada/Rancho Mirage, Ca.
Posts: 1,540
Originally Posted by Kyle's77cutlass View Post
Okay good to know.Thanks
From the island I see, hows it out there?
Good. Great weather today!


Where you at?
'69442ragtop is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old July 4th, 2018, 02:51 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
D. Yaros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,738
Originally Posted by Kyle's77cutlass View Post
Just curious. I have intentions of building a 394 one day like all other potential projects I have.
Put it in a late 30's or early 40's olds.
Cool looking carb, kinda aiming to keep the 394 old school looking.
I know nothing about Slim Jim trans, kinda kicking the idea of a standard with the 394.
Most folk are not aware that "back in the day" one could get a factory 3-on-the-tree behind the 394. How do I know? I was lucky enough to own one and it hauled you know what! Mine was a 1960 Super 88 Holiday SceniCoupe (bubbletop).

Last edited by D. Yaros; August 13th, 2018 at 03:47 PM.
D. Yaros is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old July 4th, 2018, 05:37 PM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ste Rose Manitoba Canada
Posts: 159
Oh I bet. I read up on the 394, was a power house back in the day. 345hp and 400 ft lbs torque.
Hard to keep rubber on them rims. Lol
Kyle's77cutlass is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old July 5th, 2018, 12:21 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Tedd Thompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Ranch Ca.
Posts: 4,874
Here is a place that I've bought 4gc parts from, there are others if you look a round. They are not a bad carb if not to worn out..... Tedd....https://quadrajetparts.com/accelerat...c-104_109.html
Tedd Thompson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old July 5th, 2018, 12:45 PM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ste Rose Manitoba Canada
Posts: 159
Sweet. Thanks
Kyle's77cutlass is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old August 10th, 2018, 12:07 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
5998DownUnder's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 385
My Q-Jet packed it in.
I just so happened to have a brand new Holley 600 Vac secondary in a box in the shed.
Had to get an adaptor plate as the manifold bolts do not line up with the Holley holes. Drives beutifull ever since.

You can also use a 600 Edelbrock, apparently bolts straight on, or I think you might need an adaptor plate to go to square bore.
5998DownUnder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old August 10th, 2018, 01:47 PM
  #13  
Oldsdruid
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southside Vajenya
Posts: 6,314
4GC are either good or junk in my experience. Very sensitive to having the right throttle plate to bowl gasket. They have primary and secondary side floats and the secondary air valves are buried deep in the carb. Kinda small in CFM department too, 450-500 IIRC. But set up right they will boogie with the rest of same or near CFM rating.

Any chance this one still has its aluminum ID tag under an airhorn screw? Makes it ever so much easier to get the right rebuild kit.
rocketraider is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old August 11th, 2018, 10:10 PM
  #14  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ste Rose Manitoba Canada
Posts: 159
Originally Posted by rocketraider View Post
4GC are either good or junk in my experience. Very sensitive to having the right throttle plate to bowl gasket. They have primary and secondary side floats and the secondary air valves are buried deep in the carb. Kinda small in CFM department too, 450-500 IIRC. But set up right they will boogie with the rest of same or near CFM rating.

Any chance this one still has its aluminum ID tag under an airhorn screw? Makes it ever so much easier to get the right rebuild kit.
Yes, both have them on
Kyle's77cutlass is offline  
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gberling
General Discussion
10
September 17th, 2013 11:06 PM
rougebeats
Big Blocks
5
February 1st, 2010 06:08 AM
rougebeats
Parts Wanted
2
October 17th, 2009 08:57 AM
Hal Robinson
Parts Wanted
0
February 24th, 2009 09:51 AM
sanemb
General Discussion
3
May 28th, 2008 06:43 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Rochester 4GC Carb


Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.