Weird question about my intake manifold

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old January 29th, 2010, 03:39 PM
  #1  
1972 Cutlass 455
Thread Starter
 
silverriff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 323
Unhappy Weird question about my intake manifold

Along with the issues I am having with my carb, I had another question about my stock 455 intake manifold. I noticed that when I took my carb off, that there is no separation between the passenger side primary and secondary ports in the manifold. On the driver side, there is a little separation between the primary and secondary ports. it is about an inch or so deep before it seems to open up. Forgive my lack of manifold anatomy. I'm no engineer, it just seems weird that one side would be completely open and clear, and the other side would be more than 50% separated. If it is not supposed to be like that, could that have something to do with my carb/vacuum problems? I am just not having a very good week!
silverriff is offline  
Old January 29th, 2010, 04:03 PM
  #2  
Land Yacht Captain
 
66ninetyeightls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Shelburne, Ontario
Posts: 1,727
Post a picture of it.
66ninetyeightls is offline  
Old January 29th, 2010, 04:09 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Coltonis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 208
For this, a picture would definitely help, but...

Does there appear to be any tool marks?
(Like someone was cutting or ground it down)
Or maybe is it a flat machined surface?

Regardless, I don't think it is at all detrimental since I want to say I have seen some newer manifolds that have absolutely no partitioning on the carb opening. Also I recall something about some people cutting out the dividers on manifolds in the hopes of increasing air flow.

But like I said if you can get a good picture some one could probably tell you for sure what is up with a quick glance.

---
Doh! he beat me :-)
Coltonis is offline  
Old January 29th, 2010, 05:48 PM
  #4  
1972 Cutlass 455
Thread Starter
 
silverriff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 323
Here is a stock intake from Ebay. See on the left side, the primary and secondary ports go all the way through as opposed to the right which is blocked up. I guess it is supposed to be that way....? Weird.










silverriff is offline  
Old January 29th, 2010, 06:17 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Lady72nRob71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 11,798
certainly looks strange...........
Almost looks like the work of mud-dauber wasps...
Lady72nRob71 is offline  
Old January 29th, 2010, 06:48 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
MN71W30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Somerset Wisconsin
Posts: 1,167
It's a dual plane intake. But I now see what you mean.

Last edited by MN71W30; January 29th, 2010 at 06:52 PM.
MN71W30 is offline  
Old January 29th, 2010, 07:29 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
70Post's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,134
That is original/correct and hasn't been modified....nothing wrong with it.
70Post is offline  
Old January 29th, 2010, 09:06 PM
  #8  
1972 Cutlass 455
Thread Starter
 
silverriff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 323
Red face

Alright cool, one less thing I have to be concerned with. I assumed that it was supposed to be like that, because nothing else on my engine has been screwed with too much over the last 30 some years, it is just weird to me that it is like that but hey, that's why I don't design engines for a living.
silverriff is offline  
Old January 30th, 2010, 12:35 PM
  #9  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,301
Originally Posted by MN71W30
It's a dual plane intake. But I now see what you mean.
FYI, dual plane means that one side of the carb feeds four cylinders and the other side feeds the other four. The runners are at two different levels so they can cross over one another. Dual plane intakes have less plenum volume to maintain velocity in the intake and thus promote low speed torque.
joe_padavano is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shamusj
Big Blocks
5
December 18th, 2014 09:28 AM
Col Wickham
Small Blocks
3
December 13th, 2009 06:30 PM
HurstOlds1775
442
4
May 7th, 2009 05:09 AM
chadnum1
Transmission
1
April 30th, 2008 11:12 AM
1BAD68"S"
Brakes/Hydraulic Systems
1
November 17th, 2006 04:20 PM



Quick Reply: Weird question about my intake manifold



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:08 AM.