stock manifolds and jm 20/22

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 29, 2011 | 09:26 AM
  #1  
nonhog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered car nut
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,146
From: Puyallup
stock manifolds and jm 20/22

Just thinking about my set up and wondering about just running stock manifolds vs. w/z manifolds or headers.
I don't think I really need to be worried about the missing 20-30 hp
by not running headers. Since its a rag top and won't be a regular strip car. I'll be real happy with a stout street car and slightly quieter cruising.

So my big question is will there be issues with not using headers with a
JM 20/22 cam?

Has anyone seen or heard of a dyno test from stock manifolds to W/Z's
From all I've read it may not be worth the price difference.
Old Apr 29, 2011 | 03:15 PM
  #2  
BlackGold's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,587
From: West Michigan
That cam doesn't need headers. No cam NEEDS headers, unless you're worried about squeezing all the performance potential out of high RPMs.

For the way you describe your car and your usage, stock manifolds are the better option. Headers make a host of routine maintenance tasks more difficult.
Old May 2, 2011 | 06:58 PM
  #3  
ah64pilot's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,703
My high school car, '72 Supreme had a cheaply built 455 w/ a JM 20-22 cam, stock iron intake manifold, Demon 750 carb, and W/Z manifolds. It ran 13.80 all day long.

I put headman headers (price) on it and ran 13.002 on BF Goodrich 295/50 white letter street tires, up to you. JMO, headers let that cam and "stock" build combo really wake up.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Speednut81
442
12
Jul 13, 2013 04:38 AM
Redog
Eighty-Eight
5
Jun 1, 2013 12:24 AM
Limey
Parts Wanted
10
Apr 15, 2013 10:45 AM
yeahbuddy
Small Blocks
26
Apr 15, 2012 01:18 PM
kevin.horton
General Discussion
47
Jul 7, 2011 09:49 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:25 PM.