Are Smog motors really that bad?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old February 23rd, 2015, 02:51 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jcalli99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 14
Are Smog motors really that bad?

I'm sure this has been gone over 1000 times, so I'm sorry. I tried searching for this topic and couldn't find the thread that discussed it.

Anyway, I have a 455 smog motor and was just curious how bad are they really? I'm not looking to build a track car or anything. I just want something that will spin the tires and something that I can blow the doors off those stupid rice burner imports. Thanks for the input.
jcalli99 is offline  
Old February 23rd, 2015, 03:03 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
captjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
"Smog motor" usually refers to a low compression engine, mostly built in the mid to late 70s. A 455 still displaces 455 cubic inches and makes a ton of torque. Are there "better" 455s? Yes Is a later 455 still a good candidate for a mild street build? Definitely! As always, it depends on your budget and goals.
captjim is offline  
Old February 23rd, 2015, 03:44 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
brownbomber77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 1,467
No. They're not that bad. Pistons may suck a little but 300hp to the wheels is a reasonable goal with an intake, cam, and headers. Just no J heads. If you really want to transform the car, start with the rear axle. Short answer, if you have one that runs fine, leave the bottom end.
brownbomber77 is offline  
Old February 23rd, 2015, 03:52 PM
  #4  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
BrownBomber sidesteps the question by suggesting ways to modify a smog motor, but in a way, he answers it as well: Stock, these motors will drink fuel like a Bowery alkie, while moving your car like a staggering junkie.

You will not beat any rice burners with a stock one of these in a '70s American car, unless that American car is a Chevette, or that rice burner is a '72 Datsun B210.

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old February 23rd, 2015, 04:00 PM
  #5  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 40,521
And definitely not if its in a 65 Jetstar. you need to find a different goal.
oldcutlass is online now  
Old February 23rd, 2015, 04:05 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jcalli99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 14
The one I have has "J" heads. I have the opportunity to pick up a backup generator 455 with "K" heads. I don't have a bunch of money to dump into either one. I just don't want to waste money on the "J" head motor if it's not gonna be worth it. Thanks guys.
jcalli99 is offline  
Old February 23rd, 2015, 04:14 PM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jcalli99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 14
Trust me, if I had the money to get a cutlass I would have. Down the road that is my goal. I got a damn good deal on that jetstar, plus its in really good shape. So for now, that's what I have to work with.
jcalli99 is offline  
Old February 23rd, 2015, 04:20 PM
  #8  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 40,521
I didn't say anything bad about the Jetstar and I think they are awesome cars. It was your goal of smoking a rice burner with it, that ain't happening.
oldcutlass is online now  
Old February 23rd, 2015, 04:43 PM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jcalli99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 14
Ya, that damn thing is a freaking boat! Lol. Thanks for being honest. Will it spin the tires at least? And not just going around a corner on wet pavement?
jcalli99 is offline  
Old February 23rd, 2015, 04:48 PM
  #10  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 40,521
You should be able to shred tire/s with a 455 in it.
oldcutlass is online now  
Old February 23rd, 2015, 06:15 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
67 Cutlass Freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 978
Doing a quick search, I found the smog engine 455 puts out roughly 190 HP, & 250 Ft/ Lbs of torque. That's pretty pathetic and the chief reason it's so low is the lack of compression, as others have stated. I agree that your best bang for buck would come from changing the rear gear ratio. Without doing anything to the bottom end, it's going to be hard to get your compression ratio up to decent levels.
Even if you were to do just the upper end, it will still add up fast. I'm going to throw some numbers at you that you can just call "guesstimates".
1) Core "C" heads - $200
2) Valves, Springs, Guides, Mill heads, Machine work - $850
3) Used intake manifold - $150
4) Used headers - $200
5) Rebuild Carb - $250
6) Cam, lifters, push rods, chain set - $450
7) Used Comp Cams roller tip rockers - $150
8) Gasket kit - $80
You just spent slightly over $2300. At least this is a good start to a respectable power plant. You could bolt this on, and start building a good short block. Those "J" heads don't flow worth a darn, but some guys have ported the snot out of them and had good results. If you're handy and have lots of time to kill you might want to do some Home Porting. This thread might be right up your alley -
https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...echniques.html


Another option for you might be to take advantage of the low compression/ restricted ports, and build a twin turbo set up. It would be more money, better gas mileage, different than anyone else's, & probably not as reliable.
Keep us posted on your progress. Good luck, Dave - The Freak
67 Cutlass Freak is offline  
Old February 23rd, 2015, 06:37 PM
  #12  
Justin
 
oldstata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: utah
Posts: 3,447
Originally Posted by jcalli99
The one I have has "J" heads. I have the opportunity to pick up a backup generator 455 with "K" heads. I don't have a bunch of money to dump into either one. I just don't want to waste money on the "J" head motor if it's not gonna be worth it. Thanks guys.
Depending on what these motors are costing you could have a pretty good build
What's wrong with the 455 with the k heads ? Or the motor with the j heads ?
455 after 71 usually have low compression pistons
oldstata is offline  
Old February 23rd, 2015, 07:52 PM
  #13  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jcalli99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 14
The one with the j heads came with the car but is j it st sitting in the engine bay. I'm planning on pulling it out this weekend to see if it will even run. The one with the k heads was a backup motor for a generator. The guy said it ran great the last time they needed it, but used oil. What is the most cost effective way to upgrade the rear end?
jcalli99 is offline  
Old February 23rd, 2015, 08:23 PM
  #14  
Moderator
 
2blu442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Medford, Oregon
Posts: 13,684
I like the Ka heads. If the purchase price is reasonable you might pick it up and do a rebuild putting in pistons to increase the compression.

I don't know how common gears are for your rear end. A member called monzaz has a business that includes rebuilding rear ends of this vintage. You could create a thread asking about what would fit, but if nobody replies you could send monzaz and message.


John
2blu442 is offline  
Old February 24th, 2015, 05:29 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
68 D88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Macon, GA
Posts: 119
I say whether you have a 68 engine or a 76 engine, and then do a complete performance rebuild with good pistons and earlier heads or aluminum heads, that you essentially get the same result, right?

I helped a friend do a performance rebuild on a 73 engine and installed earlier heads and it was a very strong motor.

Last edited by 68 D88; February 24th, 2015 at 05:31 PM.
68 D88 is offline  
Old February 24th, 2015, 07:19 PM
  #16  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jcalli99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 14
That k head motor is $300, but I stumbled on to 455 with C heads. The guy is asking $400 but I think I can get him down to $300 also. Thanks for all the info guys.
jcalli99 is offline  
Old February 24th, 2015, 07:27 PM
  #17  
Justin
 
oldstata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: utah
Posts: 3,447
Originally Posted by jcalli99
That k head motor is $300, but I stumbled on to 455 with C heads. The guy is asking $400 but I think I can get him down to $300 also. Thanks for all the info guys.
Those are okay prices for a complete engine maybe missing carb
The c heads could still be small valve same with the Ka heads
I have bought 4 engines and have taken the best parts from three to have two builds ready

Just to list a few
72 block big car gave me a good std block with N crank
The marine engine was cracked but had a fresh rebuild gave me a good rotating assembley std crank and big valve Ka heads were checked and had been rebuilt
You can always mix and match tell you get the best parts as long as your picking them up cheap
oldstata is offline  
Old February 24th, 2015, 07:47 PM
  #18  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jcalli99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 14
I think the c head motor came out of a late 60's two door hardtop of some kind. I couldn't understand the make. I believe he said 1969. I'm going to go look at it Friday as long as we don't get a lot of snow. Will the date be stamped on the back of the motor?
jcalli99 is offline  
Old February 24th, 2015, 07:50 PM
  #19  
Justin
 
oldstata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: utah
Posts: 3,447
Originally Posted by jcalli99
I think the c head motor came out of a late 60's two door hardtop of some kind. I couldn't understand the make. I believe he said 1969. I'm going to go look at it Friday as long as we don't get a lot of snow. Will the date be stamped on the back of the motor?
Driver side if engine just under the head there is a pad stamped it will tell you 3xxxxxx

These number/ letters will tell you make year and factory and the last few of the vin of the car

3=oldsmobile
If it is 69 9=69
M= Lansing
Just to give you a idea

Last edited by oldstata; February 24th, 2015 at 07:52 PM.
oldstata is offline  
Old February 24th, 2015, 08:56 PM
  #20  
Moderator
 
2blu442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Medford, Oregon
Posts: 13,684
If the 1969 is a runner it will have higher compression pistons. If it needs rebuilt with new pistons, it may not be better than the marine engine. Ka heads were large valve only whereas the C's could be large or small valve.

Here's where the number is located that oldstata was describing.

PA221821.jpg

PA221822.jpg
2blu442 is offline  
Old February 26th, 2015, 10:39 AM
  #21  
Registered User
 
botmbulb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 29
A low compression 455 can run really well. I had a 71 Toronado engine (my grandfather bought the car new) in my 74 Omega street car that weighed 3980 lbs. with me in it. The engine had 120,000+ on it when I put it in, 100% original, and ran 13.50's with open headers. I put a cam in it and ran a best of 12.86. In my 73 Omega race car (3550 lbs.), I had a 76 455 with a cam, headers, stock intake and Quadrajet, stock TH350 converter from the Omega, and with mildly ported J heads it ran 12.50's. I freshened it and switched to E heads and ran a best of 12.18. Timing helps a lot. I ran 45° total with all my low compression engines.
botmbulb is offline  
Old February 28th, 2015, 12:39 AM
  #22  
Acceleratii maxim rapidus
 
73aussie455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great Southern Taxland...
Posts: 369
My stock '73 455 4v with J heads and 2:73 rear, destroys tyres..

[botmbulb], 45° total eh. What was your initial timing set to? (vac advance disconnected)

Last edited by 73aussie455; February 28th, 2015 at 12:48 AM. Reason: add
73aussie455 is offline  
Old February 28th, 2015, 06:03 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
botmbulb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 29
Originally Posted by 73aussie455
My stock '73 455 4v with J heads and 2:73 rear, destroys tyres..

[botmbulb], 45° total eh. What was your initial timing set to? (vac advance disconnected)
22-24 initial, no vacuum advance.
botmbulb is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
odddoylerules
Small Blocks
34
April 21st, 2014 07:54 AM
airmale
Small Blocks
10
November 13th, 2013 11:15 AM
bisscrac
Parts Wanted
11
November 5th, 2013 05:08 AM
Jamesbo
The Clubhouse
12
February 2nd, 2010 06:10 AM
The Pope
Big Blocks
7
July 27th, 2007 01:09 PM



Quick Reply: Are Smog motors really that bad?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:58 AM.