Heads or Pistons?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old October 8th, 2021, 05:58 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Offline999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Western Massachusetts
Posts: 27
Heads or Pistons?

Looking for some opinions on best "bang for the buck."
My '68 Cutlass convertible was swapped over to a 455 before I bought it. It turns out it's a 1976 smogger-headed motor. I'm going to have some engine work done over the winter and was wondering if anyone had any advice on where to best spend the money to increase performance:

a. Replace the heads
b. Install higher compression pistons
c. Ditch the smogger and try to find an earlier motor

it seems like doing the heads is the no-brainer (assuming the low-compression bottom end is solid)

Thoughts?
Offline999 is offline  
Old October 8th, 2021, 06:20 AM
  #2  
Olds Fanatic
 
69 Hurst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Cartersville, GA
Posts: 649
I would go with "C". It will also allow you to keep using the car while working on the other one.
69 Hurst is offline  
Old October 8th, 2021, 07:14 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
BillK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Beautiful Southern Maryland
Posts: 1,407
Depending on your budget I would go with what 69 said. You don't even necessarily need to get an earlier engine. Just get something that you can build the way you want it and then swap it in. If you want to stick with cast iron heads then I guess an earlier engine would have better heads on it. Really just depends on what your goals are and what you budget is.
BillK is offline  
Old October 8th, 2021, 09:51 AM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Offline999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Western Massachusetts
Posts: 27
Originally Posted by 69 Hurst
I would go with "C". It will also allow you to keep using the car while working on the other one.
Thanks!

I live in New England and convertible season is coming to an end anyway plus there's some suspension work I'm going to have done at the same time so the car is going to be out of commission either way.

Bolting some better heads on seems like a quick HP win even with the 8:1 pistons. I'm not sure how much difference something like a 10:1 stroke is going to add.
It would be interesting to know if anyone has numbers for big valve heads on a lower compression motor.

The thing I do like about option C is it's probably gonna cost me about the same since it's the good heads that are the expensive part. The long block isn't likely to drive the price up much more so might as well just get that "thrown in."
Offline999 is offline  
Old October 8th, 2021, 09:55 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Fun71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 14,121
My opinion is the heads won’t make as much of a difference as you think. Look at the power specs of a 71 or 72 442 to see what you could expect with everything else original on your engine. Keep in mind the 76 engine was likely rated with single exhaust and a restrictive catalytic converter.

Last edited by Fun71; October 8th, 2021 at 10:08 AM.
Fun71 is offline  
Old October 8th, 2021, 10:01 AM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Offline999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Western Massachusetts
Posts: 27
Originally Posted by Fun71
My opinion is the heads won’t make as much of a difference as you think. Look at the power specs of a 71 or 71 442 to see what you could expect with everything else original on your engine. Keep in mind the 76 engine was likely rated with single exhaust and a restrictive catalytic converter.
Good point.
It's hard to compare the 1976 stats since it's been converted to dual Flowmaster exhaust.

I'll definitely check those numbers for 1971.
THANKS!
Offline999 is offline  
Old October 8th, 2021, 12:39 PM
  #7  
Olds Fanatic
 
69 Hurst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Cartersville, GA
Posts: 649
Originally Posted by Offline999
Thanks!
....The thing I do like about option C is it's probably gonna cost me about the same since it's the good heads that are the expensive part. The long block isn't likely to drive the price up much more so might as well just get that "thrown in."
Exactly!
69 Hurst is offline  
Old October 8th, 2021, 01:56 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
matt69olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: central Indiana
Posts: 5,339
Unless you have a set of decent early heads, I’d go aftermarket in a heartbeat! It’s really hard to rebuild 50 year old heads cheap. It’s also a well proven fact aluminum heads are a bolt on 30-50 hp over iron.

Let’s say the iron heads need a complete rebuild. Resurfacing, guides, springs, maybe a couple valves, possible valve seats,etc. Obviously the earlier heads will Breath better than the smoggers you have now, the engine will perform closer to what it would have in the early years. Now think about the money you would need to spend on the iron stuff to gain the 30-50 hp with the aluminum? The cheaper iron head rebuild isn’t such a bargain.

If the engine is mechanically sound, mill whatever heads you decide to use, run thin head gaskets, that will help with the lousy compression.

Last edited by matt69olds; October 9th, 2021 at 10:56 AM.
matt69olds is offline  
Old October 8th, 2021, 02:36 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,888
Uhhh guys, you're forgetting what's coming early next year! Smaller chamber Edelbrock heads, but with the bigger valves.
Your stock J heads are roughly 83-84cc, these will be 68. Use a thin head gasket as mentioned and you're looking at almost a full ratio increase.
Add an intake etc and it'll be a different car, guaranteed. Stay wahhhm! Lol!

Last edited by cutlassefi; October 8th, 2021 at 02:49 PM.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old October 8th, 2021, 05:54 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
OLDSter Ralph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: St. Paul Minnesota
Posts: 4,130
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Uhhh guys, you're forgetting what's coming early next year! Smaller chamber Edelbrock heads, but with the bigger valves.
Your stock J heads are roughly 83-84cc, these will be 68. Use a thin head gasket as mentioned and you're looking at almost a full ratio increase.
Add an intake etc and it'll be a different car, guaranteed. Stay wahhhm! Lol!
I must have missed it. You are referring to the Big Boy Olds heads ? There has been so much chatter about the Small Boy Olds heads that I thought nothing was happening with BBO heads. What size valves and ports ?
OLDSter Ralph is offline  
Old October 8th, 2021, 09:24 PM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Offline999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Western Massachusetts
Posts: 27
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Uhhh guys, you're forgetting what's coming early next year! Smaller chamber Edelbrock heads, but with the bigger valves.
Your stock J heads are roughly 83-84cc, these will be 68. Use a thin head gasket as mentioned and you're looking at almost a full ratio increase.
Add an intake etc and it'll be a different car, guaranteed. Stay wahhhm! Lol!
I've been reading about Edelbrock heads in other threads.
Might be worth holding out for.
Offline999 is offline  
Old October 8th, 2021, 09:25 PM
  #12  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Offline999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Western Massachusetts
Posts: 27
Originally Posted by matt69olds
Unless you have a set of decent early heads, I’d go aftermarket in a heartbeat! It’s really hard to rebuild 50 year old heads cheap. It’s also a well proven fact aluminum heads are a bolt on 30-50 hp over iron.

Let’s say the iron heads need a complete rebuild. Resurfacing, guides, springs, maybe a couple valves, possible valve seats,etc. Obviously the earlier heads will Heath better than the s******s you have now, the engine will perform closer to what it would have in the early years. Now think about the money you would need to spend on the iron stuff to gain the 30-50 hp with the aluminum? The cheaper iron head rebuild isn’t such a bargain.

If the engine is mechanically sound, mill whatever heads you decide to use, run thin head gaskets, that will help with the lousy compression.
Thanks for the perspective.
Offline999 is offline  
Old October 10th, 2021, 08:51 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
android 211's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 321
Being that there isn't much difference between a 68 shortblock and a 76 shortblock you ought to buy the new aluminum heads if money isn't a big factor.
If you want to keep the factory look and save a few hundred dollars then get some 'C' heads, not hard to find and exchange them on your '76 shortblock.
android 211 is offline  
Old October 10th, 2021, 03:55 PM
  #14  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Offline999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Western Massachusetts
Posts: 27
Originally Posted by android 211
Being that there isn't much difference between a 68 shortblock and a 76 shortblock you ought to buy the new aluminum heads if money isn't a big factor.
If you want to keep the factory look and save a few hundred dollars then get some 'C' heads, not hard to find and exchange them on your '76 shortblock.
Thanks!
That's exactly the guidance I was looking for.
Offline999 is offline  
Old October 11th, 2021, 12:30 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
ajr2820's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 318
I have a completely rebuilt set of C heads if you are interested.
ajr2820 is offline  
Old October 11th, 2021, 08:58 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
edzolz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Red Oak, Texas
Posts: 2,986
Something I learned a long time ago, "There is no substitute for high compression or more cubic inches".
edzolz is offline  
Old October 12th, 2021, 11:17 AM
  #17  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Offline999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Western Massachusetts
Posts: 27
Originally Posted by edzolz
Something I learned a long time ago, "There is no substitute for high compression or more cubic inches".
Absolutely!
The question is...where to spend finite dollars.

Does replacing the smogger "J" heads with bigger-valve better-flowing heads (essentially a bolt-on job) increase horsepower more than tearing apart the lower end to replace the dished pistons with non-dished pistons. (A much bigger job)
Offline999 is offline  
Old October 12th, 2021, 05:25 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
DROLDS707172's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 238
455

Couple of years back, I slapped a stock set of "C" castings onto a 74 455 with an elgin super stock cam and an edelbrock performer intake, 850 double pumper and cheap headers the 70 cutlass it was in smoked a friend at work's new coyote mustang. If the bottom is tight, save some cash and slap those new Edelbrocks on!
DROLDS707172 is offline  
Old October 12th, 2021, 08:54 PM
  #19  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Offline999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Western Massachusetts
Posts: 27
Originally Posted by DROLDS707172
Couple of years back, I slapped a stock set of "C" castings onto a 74 455 with an elgin super stock cam and an edelbrock performer intake, 850 double pumper and cheap headers the 70 cutlass it was in smoked a friend at work's new coyote mustang. If the bottom is tight, save some cash and slap those new Edelbrocks on!
NICE!
That sounds like a good plan.

Thanks
Offline999 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tbirder74
Small Blocks
8
June 19th, 2021 08:33 PM
rekain
Racing and High Performance
11
April 28th, 2019 03:22 PM
deadeyejedi
Big Blocks
4
June 23rd, 2016 04:38 PM
455cutlass1969
Big Blocks
1
April 3rd, 2012 02:06 PM
MN71W30
Big Blocks
2
June 19th, 2009 09:26 AM



Quick Reply: Heads or Pistons?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:48 AM.