Heads or Pistons?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 8, 2021 | 05:58 AM
  #1  
Offline999's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 27
From: Western Massachusetts
Heads or Pistons?

Looking for some opinions on best "bang for the buck."
My '68 Cutlass convertible was swapped over to a 455 before I bought it. It turns out it's a 1976 smogger-headed motor. I'm going to have some engine work done over the winter and was wondering if anyone had any advice on where to best spend the money to increase performance:

a. Replace the heads
b. Install higher compression pistons
c. Ditch the smogger and try to find an earlier motor

it seems like doing the heads is the no-brainer (assuming the low-compression bottom end is solid)

Thoughts?
Old Oct 8, 2021 | 06:20 AM
  #2  
69 Hurst's Avatar
Olds Fanatic
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 717
From: Cartersville, GA
I would go with "C". It will also allow you to keep using the car while working on the other one.
Old Oct 8, 2021 | 07:14 AM
  #3  
BillK's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,993
From: Beautiful Southern Maryland
Depending on your budget I would go with what 69 said. You don't even necessarily need to get an earlier engine. Just get something that you can build the way you want it and then swap it in. If you want to stick with cast iron heads then I guess an earlier engine would have better heads on it. Really just depends on what your goals are and what you budget is.
Old Oct 8, 2021 | 09:51 AM
  #4  
Offline999's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 27
From: Western Massachusetts
Originally Posted by 69 Hurst
I would go with "C". It will also allow you to keep using the car while working on the other one.
Thanks!

I live in New England and convertible season is coming to an end anyway plus there's some suspension work I'm going to have done at the same time so the car is going to be out of commission either way.

Bolting some better heads on seems like a quick HP win even with the 8:1 pistons. I'm not sure how much difference something like a 10:1 stroke is going to add.
It would be interesting to know if anyone has numbers for big valve heads on a lower compression motor.

The thing I do like about option C is it's probably gonna cost me about the same since it's the good heads that are the expensive part. The long block isn't likely to drive the price up much more so might as well just get that "thrown in."
Old Oct 8, 2021 | 09:55 AM
  #5  
Fun71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15,440
From: Phoenix, AZ
My opinion is the heads won’t make as much of a difference as you think. Look at the power specs of a 71 or 72 442 to see what you could expect with everything else original on your engine. Keep in mind the 76 engine was likely rated with single exhaust and a restrictive catalytic converter.

Last edited by Fun71; Oct 8, 2021 at 10:08 AM.
Old Oct 8, 2021 | 10:01 AM
  #6  
Offline999's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 27
From: Western Massachusetts
Originally Posted by Fun71
My opinion is the heads won’t make as much of a difference as you think. Look at the power specs of a 71 or 71 442 to see what you could expect with everything else original on your engine. Keep in mind the 76 engine was likely rated with single exhaust and a restrictive catalytic converter.
Good point.
It's hard to compare the 1976 stats since it's been converted to dual Flowmaster exhaust.

I'll definitely check those numbers for 1971.
THANKS!
Old Oct 8, 2021 | 12:39 PM
  #7  
69 Hurst's Avatar
Olds Fanatic
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 717
From: Cartersville, GA
Originally Posted by Offline999
Thanks!
....The thing I do like about option C is it's probably gonna cost me about the same since it's the good heads that are the expensive part. The long block isn't likely to drive the price up much more so might as well just get that "thrown in."
Exactly!
Old Oct 8, 2021 | 01:56 PM
  #8  
matt69olds's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,120
From: central Indiana
Unless you have a set of decent early heads, I’d go aftermarket in a heartbeat! It’s really hard to rebuild 50 year old heads cheap. It’s also a well proven fact aluminum heads are a bolt on 30-50 hp over iron.

Let’s say the iron heads need a complete rebuild. Resurfacing, guides, springs, maybe a couple valves, possible valve seats,etc. Obviously the earlier heads will Breath better than the smoggers you have now, the engine will perform closer to what it would have in the early years. Now think about the money you would need to spend on the iron stuff to gain the 30-50 hp with the aluminum? The cheaper iron head rebuild isn’t such a bargain.

If the engine is mechanically sound, mill whatever heads you decide to use, run thin head gaskets, that will help with the lousy compression.

Last edited by matt69olds; Oct 9, 2021 at 10:56 AM.
Old Oct 8, 2021 | 02:36 PM
  #9  
cutlassefi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,505
From: Central Fl
Uhhh guys, you're forgetting what's coming early next year! Smaller chamber Edelbrock heads, but with the bigger valves.
Your stock J heads are roughly 83-84cc, these will be 68. Use a thin head gasket as mentioned and you're looking at almost a full ratio increase.
Add an intake etc and it'll be a different car, guaranteed. Stay wahhhm! Lol!

Last edited by cutlassefi; Oct 8, 2021 at 02:49 PM.
Old Oct 8, 2021 | 05:54 PM
  #10  
OLDSter Ralph's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 5,220
From: St. Paul Minnesota
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Uhhh guys, you're forgetting what's coming early next year! Smaller chamber Edelbrock heads, but with the bigger valves.
Your stock J heads are roughly 83-84cc, these will be 68. Use a thin head gasket as mentioned and you're looking at almost a full ratio increase.
Add an intake etc and it'll be a different car, guaranteed. Stay wahhhm! Lol!
I must have missed it. You are referring to the Big Boy Olds heads ? There has been so much chatter about the Small Boy Olds heads that I thought nothing was happening with BBO heads. What size valves and ports ?
Old Oct 8, 2021 | 09:24 PM
  #11  
Offline999's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 27
From: Western Massachusetts
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Uhhh guys, you're forgetting what's coming early next year! Smaller chamber Edelbrock heads, but with the bigger valves.
Your stock J heads are roughly 83-84cc, these will be 68. Use a thin head gasket as mentioned and you're looking at almost a full ratio increase.
Add an intake etc and it'll be a different car, guaranteed. Stay wahhhm! Lol!
I've been reading about Edelbrock heads in other threads.
Might be worth holding out for.
Old Oct 8, 2021 | 09:25 PM
  #12  
Offline999's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 27
From: Western Massachusetts
Originally Posted by matt69olds
Unless you have a set of decent early heads, I’d go aftermarket in a heartbeat! It’s really hard to rebuild 50 year old heads cheap. It’s also a well proven fact aluminum heads are a bolt on 30-50 hp over iron.

Let’s say the iron heads need a complete rebuild. Resurfacing, guides, springs, maybe a couple valves, possible valve seats,etc. Obviously the earlier heads will Heath better than the s******s you have now, the engine will perform closer to what it would have in the early years. Now think about the money you would need to spend on the iron stuff to gain the 30-50 hp with the aluminum? The cheaper iron head rebuild isn’t such a bargain.

If the engine is mechanically sound, mill whatever heads you decide to use, run thin head gaskets, that will help with the lousy compression.
Thanks for the perspective.
Old Oct 10, 2021 | 08:51 AM
  #13  
android 211's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 338
Being that there isn't much difference between a 68 shortblock and a 76 shortblock you ought to buy the new aluminum heads if money isn't a big factor.
If you want to keep the factory look and save a few hundred dollars then get some 'C' heads, not hard to find and exchange them on your '76 shortblock.
Old Oct 10, 2021 | 03:55 PM
  #14  
Offline999's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 27
From: Western Massachusetts
Originally Posted by android 211
Being that there isn't much difference between a 68 shortblock and a 76 shortblock you ought to buy the new aluminum heads if money isn't a big factor.
If you want to keep the factory look and save a few hundred dollars then get some 'C' heads, not hard to find and exchange them on your '76 shortblock.
Thanks!
That's exactly the guidance I was looking for.
Old Oct 11, 2021 | 12:30 PM
  #15  
ajr2820's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 329
From: North Carolina
I have a completely rebuilt set of C heads if you are interested.
Old Oct 11, 2021 | 08:58 PM
  #16  
edzolz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,009
From: Red Oak, Texas
Something I learned a long time ago, "There is no substitute for high compression or more cubic inches".
Old Oct 12, 2021 | 11:17 AM
  #17  
Offline999's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 27
From: Western Massachusetts
Originally Posted by edzolz
Something I learned a long time ago, "There is no substitute for high compression or more cubic inches".
Absolutely!
The question is...where to spend finite dollars.

Does replacing the smogger "J" heads with bigger-valve better-flowing heads (essentially a bolt-on job) increase horsepower more than tearing apart the lower end to replace the dished pistons with non-dished pistons. (A much bigger job)
Old Oct 12, 2021 | 05:25 PM
  #18  
DROLDS707172's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 238
455

Couple of years back, I slapped a stock set of "C" castings onto a 74 455 with an elgin super stock cam and an edelbrock performer intake, 850 double pumper and cheap headers the 70 cutlass it was in smoked a friend at work's new coyote mustang. If the bottom is tight, save some cash and slap those new Edelbrocks on!
Old Oct 12, 2021 | 08:54 PM
  #19  
Offline999's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 27
From: Western Massachusetts
Originally Posted by DROLDS707172
Couple of years back, I slapped a stock set of "C" castings onto a 74 455 with an elgin super stock cam and an edelbrock performer intake, 850 double pumper and cheap headers the 70 cutlass it was in smoked a friend at work's new coyote mustang. If the bottom is tight, save some cash and slap those new Edelbrocks on!
NICE!
That sounds like a good plan.

Thanks
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tbirder74
Small Blocks
8
Jun 19, 2021 08:33 PM
rekain
Racing and High Performance
11
Apr 28, 2019 03:22 PM
deadeyejedi
Big Blocks
4
Jun 23, 2016 04:38 PM
455cutlass1969
Big Blocks
1
Apr 3, 2012 02:06 PM
MN71W30
Big Blocks
2
Jun 19, 2009 09:26 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:06 PM.