Engine timing issue

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old June 21st, 2013 | 01:48 AM
  #1  
oldsconv's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 284
From: Delmar, NY
Engine timing issue

Wondering if I have an issue. 70 SX Conv with 455 and QJet. I eliminated TCS solenoid but all else is stock. Dstributer is a rebuilt NAPA unit with Pertronix conversion. Vacuum for distributer goes to port on carb which is how I saw it in assembly manual. I think some vacuum sources are ported and only come on at certain rpm versus manifold vacuum.

Anyway.....I set timing with vacuum disconnected to 8 btdc. I reconnected vacuum and it still reads 8. Shouldn't it read different? Maybe I have wrong vacuum source or vacuum advance on distributer is bad?
Old June 21st, 2013 | 02:44 AM
  #2  
Seff's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,591
From: Denmark
If you're connecting and disconnecting the vacuum to ported vacuum at idle, there shouldn't be a big change. Ported vacuum is the small one on the driver's side of the front of the Qjet. This won't make vacuum before you're off the idle circuit, which is advantageous.
Old June 21st, 2013 | 03:15 AM
  #3  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by Seff
This won't make vacuum before you're off the idle circuit, which is advantageous.
.. Or not, depending on other factors, such as your cam - use whichever vacuum source makes your car run better.

What happened to the original distributor?

- Eric
Old June 21st, 2013 | 03:34 AM
  #4  
oldsconv's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 284
From: Delmar, NY
I have original distributer but shaft bushings were worn and vacuum advance broken. Eventually I want to get it rebuilt and set up for my engine but the rebuilt one was a quick out to get the car going as I was 10 years into the resto and wanted to be done.

Does it sound like the carb port is the factory location for distributer vacuum on thus car?
Old June 21st, 2013 | 04:12 AM
  #5  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Sounds like the right port to me - about an inch above the manifold, right?

Remember, that replacement distributor probably has different mechanical and vacuum characteristics than the original did, so other settings and connections may have to change.

- Eric
Old June 21st, 2013 | 04:50 AM
  #6  
s i 442's Avatar
Oldsmobile enthusiast
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 689
If there is not a big difference in idle between hooking and unhooking thats the wrong port.
Hook it to one that is almost touching the intake and it should really idle up then you can adjust the idle down.

Last edited by s i 442; June 21st, 2013 at 09:06 AM.
Old June 21st, 2013 | 06:55 AM
  #7  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by s i 442
If there is not a big difference in idle between hooking and unhooking that the wrong port.

This is not correct.

The '70 SX came from the factory with the vacuum advance connected to ported vacuum (the higher barb on the carburetor).
Ported vacuum is not active at idle, so you should notice no difference in engine speed at idle, whether it is connected or not, if it is working properly.

As I mentioned above, the decision whether to run ported or direct vacuum is yours, and depends on what (if any) modifications have been made to your engine, and how well it runs with each setup. Either way may be better for you, but it is definitely NOT true that if you do not see a change in how the engine runs, you have it connected wrong.



Originally Posted by s i 442
Hook it to one that is almost touching the intake and it should really idle up then you can adjust the idle down.
IF he wants to run his advance on direct vacuum rather than ported vacuum.

- Eric
Old June 21st, 2013 | 08:48 AM
  #8  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 41,125
From: Poteau, Ok
Most engines in this era had the vacuum advance hooked to ported vacuum. People have been arguing over running it on ported vs manifold for years, we have many threads on it. Some engines like it some don't. As Eric stated, it's a personal preference depending on your engine, there is no right or wrong way.

When you installed the Pertronix unit, did you bypass the resistor wire?
Old June 21st, 2013 | 09:10 AM
  #9  
s i 442's Avatar
Oldsmobile enthusiast
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 689
This is not correct.

The '70 SX came from the factory with the vacuum advance connected to ported vacuum (the higher barb on the carburetor).
Ported vacuum is not active at idle, so you should notice no difference in engine speed at idle, whether it is connected or not, if it is working properly.
Well sure it is that why you immediately changed to full vacuum at idle for better performance!

Find a port that is pulling vacuum at idle hook the advance up to it and idle it down.
Or hook to ported vacuum and constantly fight bad idle and rising water temps from a surging engine and hard starting.

Last edited by s i 442; June 21st, 2013 at 09:13 AM.
Old June 21st, 2013 | 09:20 AM
  #10  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Oh goody. We're having the "Ported / Non-Ported Vacuum Advance" argument again.

My car is running its advance on direct vacuum because it works best with my setup.
I know because I tried both.
Your mileage may vary.
There is no absolute correct answer, only what works best for you.

- Eric
Old June 21st, 2013 | 02:38 PM
  #11  
s i 442's Avatar
Oldsmobile enthusiast
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 689
No were not because I couldn't care less what someone else does after I give advice.
My cars I have had ran horrible if they didn't have full vacuum and I was a non believer for years until I tried it and got it all lined out within minutes!
Old June 21st, 2013 | 05:25 PM
  #12  
Octania's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,286
Originally Posted by MDchanic
Oh goody. We're having the "Ported / Non-Ported Vacuum Advance" argument again.

My car is running its advance on direct vacuum because it works best with my setup.
I know because I tried both.
Your mileage may vary.
There is no absolute correct answer, only what works best for you.

- Eric
Amen to that

"Find a port that is pulling vacuum at idle hook the advance up to it and idle it down.
Or hook to ported vacuum and constantly fight bad idle and rising water temps from a surging engine and hard starting."
=================
DOUBLE AMEN to that
high compression 403 last year
went to mechanical HEI, not computerized.
Overheated extremely and immediately
poor performance
would not idle down right
advance enough to run right then it kicks back and won't start easily.

Changed to manifold vacuum, set idle and everything back to proper.

Easy start
superb throttle response
NO overheating, using the 307's radiator.

This was my experience.
Whatever works for your car.
Old July 7th, 2013 | 03:58 AM
  #13  
my442conv's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 86
From: New Jersey
455 vacuum

on a 1970-72 455, what should the vacuum range be?
Joe
Old July 7th, 2013 | 05:26 AM
  #14  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
That depends entirely on your cam.

- Eric
Old July 14th, 2013 | 07:31 AM
  #15  
walkerse's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 29
Help with timing

what should be the timing be set on a 70 olds 455?

Specifications Intake
RPM Range: 1800 to 6000 Valve Lash: Hyd.
Valve Timing: 0.006 Duration: 274
Lobe Separation: 110° Duration @ .050" Lift: 230
Intake Centerline: 106° Valve Lift: 0.52
Lobe Lift: 0.325
Valve Timing @ 0.006 Lift:
Old July 14th, 2013 | 07:54 AM
  #16  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 41,125
From: Poteau, Ok
I would set it @34-36 deg btdc @3-3500 rpm with vacuum advance disconnected and plugged. Then raise the rpm and make sure you have no further advance at higher rpms. The initial timing at idle will be what it will be. Then you need to double check with your vacuum advance connected to ensure you don't exceed 50 deg btdc at the same rpm's.
Old July 14th, 2013 | 08:18 AM
  #17  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,335
From: Northern VA
The problem with bypassing the TCS and hooking the distributor directly to PORTED vacuum is that you no longer have the benefit of the TVS that switches to MANIFOLD vacuum if the car starts to overheat at idle. Personally, I'd use straight manifold vacuum, but if the car does run better with ported, at least get a TVS in place as a safety measure.
Old July 15th, 2013 | 05:29 PM
  #18  
walkerse's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 29
thanks for the info. ill give it a try.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1yesfan
Eighty-Eight
9
August 4th, 2015 06:40 PM
Dead Reckon
Small Blocks
18
July 14th, 2014 02:35 PM
1971viking
Big Blocks
6
July 11th, 2012 11:32 AM
defiant1
Small Blocks
10
May 18th, 2010 11:06 PM
442scotty
General Discussion
8
May 13th, 2009 05:42 PM



Quick Reply: Engine timing issue



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:02 AM.