Edelbrock 850 or rochester 800 cfm for a 455 olds

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old November 16th, 2011, 07:58 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
joepenoso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 314
Question Edelbrock 850 or rochester 800 cfm for a 455 olds

I can get a Edelbrock 850 #1910 or Rochester 800 cfm( Mid 70s's Buick) for a 455 Olds.
Need to rebuild the stock 750 rochester with cast iron manifold.
Should I stay stock or ....Upgrade to a newer bigger carb.???
Thanks
joepenoso
joepenoso is offline  
Old November 16th, 2011, 08:00 PM
  #2  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
Stay stock if there's nothing wrong with your carb and if you haven't tuned your engine to way higher revs or way lower vacuum.

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old November 17th, 2011, 08:53 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Run to Rund's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,842
Stock is much easier. The big carbs have bigger primaries which won't help gas mileage. The bigger carb would only help in racing, and Olds stockers have gone 10's with the 750 carb. . .
Run to Rund is offline  
Old November 17th, 2011, 10:17 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
matt69olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: central Indiana
Posts: 5,245
I have the Edelbrock 850 Q-jet on my engine, I love it. If you have plans for future upgrades the the bigger carb might be good. I don't think you can go wrong with any of the carbs if your willing to rebuild them correctly and take the time to dial them in.
matt69olds is offline  
Old November 17th, 2011, 10:30 AM
  #5  
delete
 
droptopron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 2,807
Originally Posted by matt69olds
I have the Edelbrock 850 Q-jet on my engine, I love it.
x2

I like the electric choke too. I know you can retrofit it to any carb but its nice to have.

I am running it on a '69 400 with an edelbrock Performer, stock cam & stock torque converter and it runs really well.

Last edited by droptopron; November 17th, 2011 at 10:32 AM.
droptopron is offline  
Old November 17th, 2011, 10:56 AM
  #6  
this is not my car lol
 
scubastever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 362
go big or go lean.



(that's the worst advice, ever)
scubastever is offline  
Old November 17th, 2011, 11:30 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,827
If you're going to use the original iron intake, what benefit would you get by going with a bigger carb, the answer is none.

Stay with the stocker, properly calibrated.

Jmo
cutlassefi is online now  
Old November 17th, 2011, 01:15 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Stevec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Southington,Connecticut
Posts: 970
69 400

Originally Posted by droptopron
x2

I like the electric choke too. I know you can retrofit it to any carb but its nice to have.

I am running it on a '69 400 with an edelbrock Performer, stock cam & stock torque converter and it runs really well.
I have a stock 68 400 and I went with the 600 runs great but I think I could have gone bigger. Are you running an 850? That's not to big? Steve
Stevec is offline  
Old November 17th, 2011, 02:02 PM
  #9  
delete
 
droptopron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 2,807
Originally Posted by Stevec
I have a stock 68 400 and I went with the 600 runs great but I think I could have gone bigger. Are you running an 850? That's not to big? Steve
I have it on a Performer and it runs well. I recently had it rebuilt by Everyday Performance and the guy commented that he doesn't know why it is but that carb seems to be adaptable to a wide range of engine set ups with just bolting it on and adjusting it.

One other comment though - It has the fuel line coming into the side (Chevy style) instead of straight into the front so if original appearance is a factor you should keep that in mind.

http://www.everyday-performance.com/

If anybody needs a carb rebuilt he was very reasonable and got it done pretty quickly.
droptopron is offline  
Old November 18th, 2011, 06:33 AM
  #10  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 40,553
On a stock manifold it will also require a spreadbore to squarebore adaptor, it's 3/4" taller. So if there are any height requirements, I would go with the stock quadrajet.
oldcutlass is online now  
Old November 18th, 2011, 07:13 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
507OLDS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Erie,PA
Posts: 3,814
We flowed one of those Edelbrock 850's. They don't flow 850,not even close.A typical 455 street engine,with an iron intake or aftermarket dual-plane does not need anything more than 750-780cfm.It will not spin fast enough,or have the potential top-end power to demand anything more.
The 500" Cadillacs were supposed to have an 800cfm carb,& they don't.
The 455 Buicks were supposed to have 800cfm carbs,and they don't either.
They don't need them.
507OLDS is offline  
Old November 19th, 2011, 08:36 PM
  #12  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
joepenoso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 314
Question

Ok.................................... I'll bite
What did the Quadrajet Edelbrock 850's flow?
What do the GM 750 or 800's flow??
Thanks for everyones opininions and help in this matter
joepenoso
joepenoso is offline  
Old November 20th, 2011, 08:06 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
507OLDS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Erie,PA
Posts: 3,814
On another note,the Q-jets from the 403's don't flow 850 either.To get one that actually does,you need to look at mid 80's Chevy vans & trucks.
The Edelbrock 850 Q-jet doesn't flow 850.
You will be fine with the carb that you have.
507OLDS is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
speck1148
Parts For Sale
6
February 22nd, 2014 01:12 PM
speck1148
Parts For Sale
6
February 27th, 2013 11:39 AM
speck1148
Parts For Sale
0
February 2nd, 2013 04:46 AM
tim72
Major Builds & Projects
3
July 26th, 2010 01:29 AM



Quick Reply: Edelbrock 850 or rochester 800 cfm for a 455 olds



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:00 PM.