Edelbrock 850 or rochester 800 cfm for a 455 olds

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 16, 2011 | 07:58 PM
  #1  
joepenoso's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 314
Question Edelbrock 850 or rochester 800 cfm for a 455 olds

I can get a Edelbrock 850 #1910 or Rochester 800 cfm( Mid 70s's Buick) for a 455 Olds.
Need to rebuild the stock 750 rochester with cast iron manifold.
Should I stay stock or ....Upgrade to a newer bigger carb.???
Thanks
joepenoso
Old Nov 16, 2011 | 08:00 PM
  #2  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Stay stock if there's nothing wrong with your carb and if you haven't tuned your engine to way higher revs or way lower vacuum.

- Eric
Old Nov 17, 2011 | 08:53 AM
  #3  
Run to Rund's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,026
Stock is much easier. The big carbs have bigger primaries which won't help gas mileage. The bigger carb would only help in racing, and Olds stockers have gone 10's with the 750 carb. . .
Old Nov 17, 2011 | 10:17 AM
  #4  
matt69olds's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,105
From: central Indiana
I have the Edelbrock 850 Q-jet on my engine, I love it. If you have plans for future upgrades the the bigger carb might be good. I don't think you can go wrong with any of the carbs if your willing to rebuild them correctly and take the time to dial them in.
Old Nov 17, 2011 | 10:30 AM
  #5  
droptopron's Avatar
delete
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,810
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by matt69olds
I have the Edelbrock 850 Q-jet on my engine, I love it.
x2

I like the electric choke too. I know you can retrofit it to any carb but its nice to have.

I am running it on a '69 400 with an edelbrock Performer, stock cam & stock torque converter and it runs really well.

Last edited by droptopron; Nov 17, 2011 at 10:32 AM.
Old Nov 17, 2011 | 10:56 AM
  #6  
scubastever's Avatar
this is not my car lol
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 362
From: Toronto
go big or go lean.



(that's the worst advice, ever)
Old Nov 17, 2011 | 11:30 AM
  #7  
cutlassefi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,484
From: Central Fl
If you're going to use the original iron intake, what benefit would you get by going with a bigger carb, the answer is none.

Stay with the stocker, properly calibrated.

Jmo
Old Nov 17, 2011 | 01:15 PM
  #8  
Stevec's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 970
From: Southington,Connecticut
69 400

Originally Posted by droptopron
x2

I like the electric choke too. I know you can retrofit it to any carb but its nice to have.

I am running it on a '69 400 with an edelbrock Performer, stock cam & stock torque converter and it runs really well.
I have a stock 68 400 and I went with the 600 runs great but I think I could have gone bigger. Are you running an 850? That's not to big? Steve
Old Nov 17, 2011 | 02:02 PM
  #9  
droptopron's Avatar
delete
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,810
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by Stevec
I have a stock 68 400 and I went with the 600 runs great but I think I could have gone bigger. Are you running an 850? That's not to big? Steve
I have it on a Performer and it runs well. I recently had it rebuilt by Everyday Performance and the guy commented that he doesn't know why it is but that carb seems to be adaptable to a wide range of engine set ups with just bolting it on and adjusting it.

One other comment though - It has the fuel line coming into the side (Chevy style) instead of straight into the front so if original appearance is a factor you should keep that in mind.

http://www.everyday-performance.com/

If anybody needs a carb rebuilt he was very reasonable and got it done pretty quickly.
Old Nov 18, 2011 | 06:33 AM
  #10  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 42,496
From: Poteau, Ok
On a stock manifold it will also require a spreadbore to squarebore adaptor, it's 3/4" taller. So if there are any height requirements, I would go with the stock quadrajet.
Old Nov 18, 2011 | 07:13 AM
  #11  
507OLDS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,814
From: Erie,PA
We flowed one of those Edelbrock 850's. They don't flow 850,not even close.A typical 455 street engine,with an iron intake or aftermarket dual-plane does not need anything more than 750-780cfm.It will not spin fast enough,or have the potential top-end power to demand anything more.
The 500" Cadillacs were supposed to have an 800cfm carb,& they don't.
The 455 Buicks were supposed to have 800cfm carbs,and they don't either.
They don't need them.
Old Nov 19, 2011 | 08:36 PM
  #12  
joepenoso's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 314
Question

Ok.................................... I'll bite
What did the Quadrajet Edelbrock 850's flow?
What do the GM 750 or 800's flow??
Thanks for everyones opininions and help in this matter
joepenoso
Old Nov 20, 2011 | 08:06 AM
  #13  
507OLDS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,814
From: Erie,PA
On another note,the Q-jets from the 403's don't flow 850 either.To get one that actually does,you need to look at mid 80's Chevy vans & trucks.
The Edelbrock 850 Q-jet doesn't flow 850.
You will be fine with the carb that you have.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
speck1148
Parts For Sale
6
Feb 22, 2014 01:12 PM
speck1148
Parts For Sale
6
Feb 27, 2013 11:39 AM
speck1148
Parts For Sale
0
Feb 2, 2013 04:46 AM
tim72
Major Builds & Projects
3
Jul 26, 2010 01:29 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:43 AM.