CN vs Nak vs Billet crankshaft

Old Dec 30, 2016 | 08:32 PM
  #1  
Gary M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,357
From: St. Louis
CN vs Nak vs Billet crankshaft

need a quick education on which is the best way to go for a 455 4 speed car. May need spelling lesson too. Billet 🤔
Old Dec 31, 2016 | 06:46 AM
  #2  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,768
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Gary M
need a quick education on which is the best way to go for a 455 4 speed car. May need spelling lesson too. Billet 🤔
Both "CN" and "N" cranks are nodular iron and are the same. A steel billet crank is far stronger and more expensive. For a street-driven car that might see only occasional track use, the nodular is more that adequate.
Old Dec 31, 2016 | 07:36 AM
  #3  
wr1970's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,645
You could go with a forged crank. I agree with Joe P. on the above post.The billet crank is the best and cost the most. Did you ever get the mondello crank problem resolved yet?
Old Dec 31, 2016 | 09:14 AM
  #4  
GOSFAST's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 49
Originally Posted by Gary M
need a quick education on which is the best way to go for a 455 4 speed car. May need spelling lesson too. Billet 🤔
If you get an OEM crank try to get one from a dedicated "stick" car, some are not set up for the pilot bushings. There were many more automatics produced than standards!

Can't recall how many we ended up boring the backs for the pilot bushings, probably done a few dozen over my years in business??

Thanks, Gary in N.Y.

P.S. Wishing all here a Happy New Year!
Old Dec 31, 2016 | 09:22 AM
  #5  
android 211's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 338
Most Olds cranks are NOT drilled for 4 speed use. The machinist I use charges $150 for the service. If you are concerned about strength then search out a '68 455 crank. Most are forged. Only '68. There is a notch on the rear flange that identifies them for sure. For street use and only occasional track use any factory crank will be fine.
Old Dec 31, 2016 | 10:52 AM
  #6  
Gary M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,357
From: St. Louis
Originally Posted by wr1970
You could go with a forged crank. I agree with Joe P. on the above post.The billet crank is the best and cost the most. Did you ever get the mondello crank problem resolved yet?
i got another one from him that looks good but I talked to a machine shop we've used for 25 years and a testing lab. Both say they have never heard of 5340 steel so I'm not going to use it for my build. It's probably fine but I'm going to sell it. A member on here has a N ak crank and a CN crank that need turning priced right. I'm very tempted to buy the billet crank though now that I know more about it.
Old Dec 31, 2016 | 11:07 AM
  #7  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,768
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Gary M
i got another one from him that looks good but I talked to a machine shop we've used for 25 years and a testing lab. Both say they have never heard of 5340 steel so I'm not going to use it for my build.
AMS5340 is the military designation for a stainless steel used primarily for investment castings. It's also known as 14-4PH. It has 130,000 psi tensile yield and 149,000 psi tensile ultimate strength.

For comparison, the nodular cast iron used in the factory cranks has a tensile yield (depending on the specific nodule size in the casting) of between 47,000 and 95,000 psi and a tensile ultimate of between 67,000 psi and 130.000 psi.
Old Dec 31, 2016 | 11:20 AM
  #8  
Gary M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,357
From: St. Louis
I believe you Joe

but from all the bad things I've heard about this Lynn guy I am not confident it really is what he claims. Is it possible that a crank containing military grade stainless would only cost 600.00? Maybe and very well could so if it is what he says whoever buys it from me is going to get a good deal. Just haven't got around to posting it yet.
Old Dec 31, 2016 | 11:27 AM
  #9  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,768
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Gary M
but from all the bad things I've heard about this Lynn guy I am not confident it really is what he claims. Is it possible that a crank containing military grade stainless would only cost 600.00? Maybe and very well could so if it is what he says whoever buys it from me is going to get a good deal. Just haven't got around to posting it yet.
I certainly can't speak to the quality of this particular part, or if it really is the material claimed. I can just provide the specs for the material. Bottom line is that it is still cast, though stainless steel is less prone to internal casting flaws than iron. The reality is that strength is less important than fracture toughness and casting quality. AMS5340 should be better for that, but I'll put money that this is a Chinesium casting, so be skeptical of quality or even material properties.
Old Dec 31, 2016 | 11:42 AM
  #10  
Gary M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,357
From: St. Louis
It's probably OK for an automatic application

Bet if I looked through the box it came in I'd find some newspaper packing w/Chinese writing on it. I walked past it with an egg roll the other day and I could swear it moved.

It should be fine for an automatic car.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bobac455
General Questions
2
Dec 29, 2019 09:53 AM
84oldsDelta88
Eighty-Eight
29
Apr 24, 2011 07:59 AM
damascus
Wheels and Tires
46
Jan 22, 2011 09:58 AM
nuttkaze
Small Blocks
2
Jun 7, 2010 02:34 PM
agtw31
Parts For Sale
0
May 17, 2010 11:10 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:34 AM.