65 442 carburetor questions
#1
65 442 carburetor questions
I am running an edelbrock 1406 at the moment on this engine and it’s seems lean to me. I couldn’t use the 4gc carb because I didn’t want to modify the linkage to accommodate the tv cable to the 200r4 transmission. The edelbrock was no problem.
should I try to re jet this carburetor or get a 1411 edelbrock? As for Quadrajets I’m not sure I can use with the transmission
appreciate your opinions thanks in advance
should I try to re jet this carburetor or get a 1411 edelbrock? As for Quadrajets I’m not sure I can use with the transmission
appreciate your opinions thanks in advance
#2
Considering that Olds only used Qjets with the 200-4R, I think you can make that work.
As for the "seems lean", based on what? Did you read the plugs? Do you have a wide-band O2 sensor? Jets and metering rods are a lot cheaper than a new carb, and the only certainty is that the new carb won't be jetted correctly for your application either. On the other hand, 600 CFM is small for an Olds 400. Carb CFM has no relationship to how lean it runs, however. All it effects is max HP.
As for the "seems lean", based on what? Did you read the plugs? Do you have a wide-band O2 sensor? Jets and metering rods are a lot cheaper than a new carb, and the only certainty is that the new carb won't be jetted correctly for your application either. On the other hand, 600 CFM is small for an Olds 400. Carb CFM has no relationship to how lean it runs, however. All it effects is max HP.
#3
By seems lean I guess what I’m really saying is it just doesn’t feel up to the engine size although it runs great This carburetor was on the 350 I just recently swapped out and was a good match for that motor. It sounds like re jetting the 1406 might be the best option. I do have a quadrajet from a 79 Chevy that might work ?
Or do I need a Qjet from a 455 ?
Or do I need a Qjet from a 455 ?
#4
By seems lean I guess what I’m really saying is it just doesn’t feel up to the engine size although it runs great This carburetor was on the 350 I just recently swapped out and was a good match for that motor. It sounds like re jetting the 1406 might be the best option. I do have a quadrajet from a 79 Chevy that might work ?
Or do I need a Qjet from a 455 ?
Or do I need a Qjet from a 455 ?
#7
I thought it might be not enough cfm , but maybe not. Going to run it for awhile and see. The problem with the Chevy Qjet is the choke set up won’t work with the olds motor that I can see
#8
Not to mention the fact that it will necessitate use of a spreadbore manifold. Installation notes for the 1406 suggest that it's good for up to 502 CI, so I'd continue to work with it if I were you.
#9
The manifold problem could probably be overcome with a spacer, but I’m going to keep the edelbrock on there and recheck all my settings again.
#12
#13
![](https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/classicoldsmobile.com-vbulletin/640x480/spreadboreadapter_7f2a72c6afe5a52dd800fda14b863caf1da73d6c.jpg)
#14
I don’t know if that matters or not?
#15
It depends on the manifold and your specific engine combo. An open spacer adds plenum volume. That may or may not be beneficial to the engine. And what happens at the mounting flange on the intake? Does it have four individual holes? If so, there's likely a flow disruption there.
#16
It depends on the manifold and your specific engine combo. An open spacer adds plenum volume. That may or may not be beneficial to the engine. And what happens at the mounting flange on the intake? Does it have four individual holes? If so, there's likely a flow disruption there.
#18
Do you still have the carburetor I sent back? I felt guilty about modifying the lineage on such a nice unit.
I’ll buy it back and the correct baseplate if you still have them . Thanks
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tiger69
The Newbie Forum
18
September 16th, 2018 10:22 AM