49-64 Camshaft failures

Old Jan 14, 2018 | 08:39 PM
  #1  
Charlie Jones's Avatar
Thread Starter
Phantom Phixer
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,525
From: Apopka, FL
49-64 Camshaft failures

Recently I have noticed in a quite a few threads that mentioned cam failures . Lobes were " rounding off " , often soon after a " rebuild " .
Several factors were blamed . Proper ZDDP content in the oil , Poor quality "offshore " parts , lack of proper break-in procedure , etc .
Any of those COULD cause a camshaft failure .

But , there is one thing that WILL cause a camshaft failure . And that is improper orientation of the connecting rods during engine assembly .
In the design of the " early Rockets " the camshaft is supposed to be lubricated by what Olds called a " spit hole " . It was a small hole drilled in the side of the rod . When this hole lined up with the oil hole in the rod journal , oil spurted out of this hole . Right toward the camshaft .
These holes must be oriented with the " spit hole " toward the camshaft . If even one rod is mis-oriented that portion of the cam will not be properly lubricated .
I think that this detail in engine assembly might be missed , even by " experts " and " been building engines all my life " types.
Here's a photo from the Oldsmobile Service manual for a better explanation ;


Last edited by Charlie Jones; Jan 14, 2018 at 08:51 PM.
Old Jan 15, 2018 | 09:24 AM
  #2  
OLDSter Ralph's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 5,216
From: St. Paul Minnesota
Charlie, its an important point to keep in mind. Many of us may not be aware of the little things. Thank you for posting.
Old Jan 15, 2018 | 01:00 PM
  #3  
Aviator's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 32
Great info. Thank you Charlie.
Old Jan 15, 2018 | 01:32 PM
  #4  
m371961's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,163
From: Sistersville, WV
same for later years.
Old Jan 15, 2018 | 06:59 PM
  #5  
Charlie Jones's Avatar
Thread Starter
Phantom Phixer
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,525
From: Apopka, FL
Originally Posted by m371961
same for later years.
Yes . until 1972 . When the " spit hole " mysteriously disappeared .
Old Jan 16, 2018 | 04:09 AM
  #6  
m371961's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,163
From: Sistersville, WV
Thanks Charlie,i did not know it stopped. Only knew mine had them. Wonder why?
Old Jan 16, 2018 | 04:56 AM
  #7  
cutlassefi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,477
From: Central Fl
Originally Posted by Charlie Jones
Yes . until 1972 . When the " spit hole " mysteriously disappeared .
Which basically means they weren’t needed. There are/were lots of reasons for cam failures, not just the lack of spit holes.
Old Jan 16, 2018 | 11:32 AM
  #8  
Charlie Jones's Avatar
Thread Starter
Phantom Phixer
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,525
From: Apopka, FL
This is only speculation , but , The post '64 engines may have better cam lubrication than the "early Rockets" . Olds may have kept them anyway after the 1965 re-design . Just to be on the safe side . Later eliminating them in a " cost cutting " move .
Old Jan 16, 2018 | 09:06 PM
  #9  
Ozzie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,614
From: S.E. Louisiana, so far still in U.S.A.
It's a good point about the spit hole. Olds wasn't the only one to use it. I've got an old AMC engine with them also. When changing rod inserts be sure the hole in the insert lines up correctly with the hole in the rod. I once had some that didn't too well requiring a bit of refitting with a proper sized drill.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
billmerbach
Small Blocks
5
Mar 27, 2014 01:43 PM
67delmont330
General Discussion
10
Jul 31, 2012 06:13 PM
Joffroi
Cutlass
31
Jun 9, 2012 07:06 PM
Lady72nRob71
Vista Cruiser & Wagons
5
Jun 2, 2011 05:06 AM
delkron97
Small Blocks
12
May 15, 2006 08:12 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:38 PM.