455 engine swap
#81
Engine mounting details
Hi guys,
Here is my best run at detailing how I built the motor mounts and mounted them to the 57 Oldsmobile frame. Excuse the drawings I am not and engineer. if you want a better copy to look at send me a pm with your e-mail and i will attach a Adobe file and send to. There is a free Adobe reader on the Internet.
Here is my best run at detailing how I built the motor mounts and mounted them to the 57 Oldsmobile frame. Excuse the drawings I am not and engineer. if you want a better copy to look at send me a pm with your e-mail and i will attach a Adobe file and send to. There is a free Adobe reader on the Internet.
#84
Thanks a million for the documents. After looking at them I think I have a pretty good idea of how you got your 455 to fit. I am sur this information will be useful for anyone else planning a 455 swap (regardless of what car they are putting it in).
Oldsguy just got his 455 in his 46 started last night. Now I have to get motivated and get my 455 transplanted. Seeing other people's success is AWSOME!
Oldsguy just got his 455 in his 46 started last night. Now I have to get motivated and get my 455 transplanted. Seeing other people's success is AWSOME!
#85
Excellent documentation and effort. Thanks for sharing that data. It looks similar to what I had to do to fit the 455 in my '46 except the front mounts I made were more boxed with the bottom open to access the ends of the bolts to attach the nuts to the Oldsmobile engine mounts and they were located in a little bit different location on the frame rails. Nice work!
#86
Thanks for the compliments guys. I am working on an idea for mounts that work on the back two bolt locations. In the near future I will post a idea for review the clears the stock box location
#87
Got the Olds back from the Exhaust shop today. 2.5" pipes really make it breath. I have ordered a underdash cable operated wiper kit that will give me the space to Relocate the MSD controller to the old wiper spot and help with the power braker 7" booster, and I will make a dicision on which disc break conversion I am going to go to this weekend. Either Mike Pemberton or Scarbird. They both have good points. I have been researching self adjusting 11" to 12" rear replacement and just for kicks front self adjusting front brakes and have spent many hours in the local wrecking yards. After lots on measuring. I am comming closer. I have cut a deal with a yard that will let me bring samples home and mess with them. I am commited to finding a solution. Another thing I am working on is finding a 14" blank Wheel that will work with a disc break conversion kit. Scarebird is local and I will visit him soon to talk about it. I don't like goingto the 15" wheel because oh the hub caps and wide whites on my 57. I will keep posting updates as I get more information. Thanks 595959 for the wheel pictures helps alot when doing comparrisons
#89
I saw another '57 with the front disc brake conversion and the owner told me you were kind of limited to an aftermarket rim. I didnt ask why, but he was limited to torq - thrust, cragars or steelies, or basically anything 5 on 5 aftermarket 14' rims
#90
On your calculator you used the wrong bore size. .040 should be 4.166.
did you measure the piston dish on the .040 pistons? Also is the deck clearence zero.
I figure the pistons have 18 cc and I come up with 10.10 to 1
Gene
did you measure the piston dish on the .040 pistons? Also is the deck clearence zero.
I figure the pistons have 18 cc and I come up with 10.10 to 1
Gene
#91
When I look up the Bore size in the Oldsmobile charts is shows that the 455 has a cylinder Bore of 4.126. My math puts this at 4.126 x .040 = 4.292 bore. The Keith Black specs show the Piston dish at 15 cc's. 1/3 of the piston is flat. Yes the deck clearence is flat.
Pat
Pat
#92
Yes, it is a problem. The Mike Pemberton converson uses a 12" rotor, You need a wheel diameter of a least 14.625 to clear even at that you most likley have to grind the ears of the rotors. The caliper will not clear a 14" disc brake rim. The Scarbird conversion uses a 11.5" Ford Thunderbird rear disc rotor, Same problem. Looks like I will have to sell my 5 new 8.75 x 14 wide whites on 14" rims. Damm I hate to give up the Super 88 Hub Caps for some funky wheel. I am not thru liiking around. I believe I have the rear adjustable brake figured out. I will pick the parts at the U-pull yard this week. I will let you know how this works out. I am also looking at a front adjustable set up that might work. I will let you know on that as well. Maybe I won't go to disc brakes after all
#94
Using this calculator and the information given,
CR is close to 10.4:1. Not an ideal choice, for use with pump gas and an "off the shelf" cam.
Factory deck height would have been a slightly "friendlier 10.1:1.
I'm guessing, that, you told them to align hone, and deck the block.
Norm
CR is close to 10.4:1. Not an ideal choice, for use with pump gas and an "off the shelf" cam.
Factory deck height would have been a slightly "friendlier 10.1:1.
I'm guessing, that, you told them to align hone, and deck the block.
Norm
#95
Norm,
Got it, I guess staying up until late at night doing all the data entries got to me. I multiplied the .040 instead of adding, duh,. The lesson learned. Re-read your information before your post to make sure you don't make this kind of mistake.
595959
Thanks for catching this as well. As stated above lesson learned
Thanks for all the input guys
Got it, I guess staying up until late at night doing all the data entries got to me. I multiplied the .040 instead of adding, duh,. The lesson learned. Re-read your information before your post to make sure you don't make this kind of mistake.
595959
Thanks for catching this as well. As stated above lesson learned
Thanks for all the input guys
#96
Using this calculator and the information given,
CR is close to 10.4:1. Not an ideal choice, for use with pump gas and an "off the shelf" cam.
Please clarify, I am very satisfied with the performance. I have not made a rear end choice yet. From all indicators I think I have around 2.73 or a litte higher. So I am in the processs of figuring this out. This is a street cruiser with some get up and go will never see the track.
Factory deck height would have been a slightly "friendlier 10.1:1.
I'm guessing, that, you told them to align hone, and deck the block.
Norm
CR is close to 10.4:1. Not an ideal choice, for use with pump gas and an "off the shelf" cam.
Please clarify, I am very satisfied with the performance. I have not made a rear end choice yet. From all indicators I think I have around 2.73 or a litte higher. So I am in the processs of figuring this out. This is a street cruiser with some get up and go will never see the track.
Factory deck height would have been a slightly "friendlier 10.1:1.
I'm guessing, that, you told them to align hone, and deck the block.
Norm
#97
Screwed this one up. It did not make since to me until I read Norms answer. Your right mutiplied instead of adding. To maney late nights working on the Olds and trying to keep up on things. Like the carpenter says "mesure twice and cut once" Next time I will check my math better better posting.
Thanks again
Pat
#99
It would be friendlier, if we were discussing iron heads, but in this case, I was reading aluminum and thinking iron.
Conventional thinking is: More compression can be (or must be?) used with aluminum heads. This is an area, where I have no experience, and little knowledge.
If your heads were iron you would need a unique profile, with an intake closing point, that would change your dynamic CR from about 9.7 to 8.5:1, or so, without increasing duration. But your heads are not iron.
Rear end choice has far less to do with cam specs, than with how the car is set up and how it is to be used. A "Bonneville" car, for instance, could use the same engine as a "dragster" but it would not be competitive, if the same rear end gears were used.
Norm
Conventional thinking is: More compression can be (or must be?) used with aluminum heads. This is an area, where I have no experience, and little knowledge.
Norm
#100
It would be friendlier, if we were discussing iron heads, but in this case, I was reading aluminum and thinking iron.
Conventional thinking is: More compression can be (or must be?) used with aluminum heads. This is an area, where I have no experience, and little knowledge.
If your heads were iron you would need a unique profile, with an intake closing point, that would change your dynamic CR from about 9.7 to 8.5:1, or so, without increasing duration. But your heads are not iron.
Rear end choice has far less to do with cam specs, than with how the car is set up and how it is to be used. A "Bonneville" car, for instance, could use the same engine as a "dragster" but it would not be competitive, if the same rear end gears were used.
Norm
Conventional thinking is: More compression can be (or must be?) used with aluminum heads. This is an area, where I have no experience, and little knowledge.
If your heads were iron you would need a unique profile, with an intake closing point, that would change your dynamic CR from about 9.7 to 8.5:1, or so, without increasing duration. But your heads are not iron.
Rear end choice has far less to do with cam specs, than with how the car is set up and how it is to be used. A "Bonneville" car, for instance, could use the same engine as a "dragster" but it would not be competitive, if the same rear end gears were used.
Norm
Anyone with Alumimum head experience please chime in with your thought, opnions
Thanks
Pat
#101
The reason I ask about the piston "cc" is that they advertise with a standard piston. Yours are an oversize so the "cc" will be more. I'm thinking more like 18 cc's. With your zero deck, and your heads I figure about 10.1 to 1 you should be fine, just run the high test or an additive in the tank. Your cam will work just fine, should give you that lumpy sound and a bunch of get up and go. I set my timming at 18* at 900 rpm and 36* total at 2500 rpm. A set of 3.08 gears will be just right for crusing and for some highway travel. If you run less than 3.08 gears, your get up and go will be a little doggy, but down the freeway you will fly.
Gene
Gene
#102
The reason I ask about the piston "cc" is that they advertise with a standard piston. Yours are an oversize so the "cc" will be more. I'm thinking more like 18 cc's. With your zero deck, and your heads I figure about 10.1 to 1 you should be fine, just run the high test or an additive in the tank. Your cam will work just fine, should give you that lumpy sound and a bunch of get up and go. I set my timming at 18* at 900 rpm and 36* total at 2500 rpm. A set of 3.08 gears will be just right for crusing and for some highway travel. If you run less than 3.08 gears, your get up and go will be a little doggy, but down the freeway you will fly.
Gene
Gene
Thanks
]
and by the way I am looking for POSI as well. Seems hard to find.
#103
Hey Norm, thats a great looking car. How come I never see cars from that era at the track? Im getting sick of all of the muscle cars being the the oldest ones I see at the track!
#105
I'll look foward to it, My wife and I have a dream of finding a small tear drop trailer and putting it behind the Olds and doing the route 66 thing and meet some on you guys along the hiways and byways of this great country
#106
Not according to the KB site. The same KB site where I verified his 15 CC spec, before I "plugged" it into the calculator.
Still using the same calculator,
if you had left the deck alone, and took about .007" off the piston top, you would have been there.
Norm
Still using the same calculator,
if you had left the deck alone, and took about .007" off the piston top, you would have been there.
Norm
#107
Well Norm
In the calculator you used the wrong bore size and the piston "CC" you used is wrong.
In the .060 "KB" pistons I used was 18 cc. Yes the site says 15 cc but it does not say for all sizes. I checked mine and they were bigger CC's
Gene
In the calculator you used the wrong bore size and the piston "CC" you used is wrong.
In the .060 "KB" pistons I used was 18 cc. Yes the site says 15 cc but it does not say for all sizes. I checked mine and they were bigger CC's
Gene
#108
Silly me. Corrected it and took another .002" off the piston, to compensate.
I subtracted 1 CC, from 15, to compensate for the .007" shorter piston top.
OK. If .030" = 15 CC, and .060" = 18 CC, then (interpolating) .040" = 16 CC, and .050" = 17 CC.
Again, this time using 16 CC,
both the deck and the pistons would remain untouched.
Norm
I subtracted 1 CC, from 15, to compensate for the .007" shorter piston top.
OK. If .030" = 15 CC, and .060" = 18 CC, then (interpolating) .040" = 16 CC, and .050" = 17 CC.
Again, this time using 16 CC,
both the deck and the pistons would remain untouched.
Norm
#110
From a production standpoint, this makes no sense.
So, I did what I always do when something makes no sense. I went straight to the source:
The reply agrees with the the KB page, in question.
It would be, if we assumed his pistons have the same dish as yours, but:
Yes, but he will never know how much power he gained (or lost) by skipping the most important part of the entire project.
Norm
So, I did what I always do when something makes no sense. I went straight to the source:
The reply agrees with the the KB page, in question.
It would be, if we assumed his pistons have the same dish as yours, but:
Yes, but he will never know how much power he gained (or lost) by skipping the most important part of the entire project.
Norm
#111
Thanks.
I can only speak for myself.
Mine are all street/highway cars, and I use timeslips for tuning (and "bragging rights"). Other than that, I seldom have any reason to visit dragstrips, or dry lakes.
Norm
I can only speak for myself.
Mine are all street/highway cars, and I use timeslips for tuning (and "bragging rights"). Other than that, I seldom have any reason to visit dragstrips, or dry lakes.
Norm
#114
Late update,
Took the 57 on a 40 first trip 5 weeks ago to Seattle and back round trip. Took the exit 2 miles from home to drop by the machihne shop that built my engine form, while at the stop light the temp started going up for the 180 it had been running at to about 220. The light changed to green and within a block it went back down to 180. Got to the machine shop, Lifted the hood and everyone came out to look at the build. Got lots of compliments. Asked about the temp change. They all looked it over and said not problem add a overflow cap the area beteeen the radiator and the grill to force the air through the radiator. No problem went home a did that the same day. Following weekend went to a rod run 8 miles round trip away total distance on engine 48 miles. On the way home overheating started again went up to 220 by the time I got home. Check the radiator not water showing. You know what I checked next of course the oil. Water in the oil. Still good oil pressure 60 lbs running 50 on idle. Called machine shop next day. Took in in the following day. They forgot to tighten down the ALU heads the third time after the Hot run blew both heat gaskets. All that needs rebuilding is being done at theri expense. will have back at home on Friday before I leave on vacation. Lucky to have a honest machine shop. Still smilling.
Took the 57 on a 40 first trip 5 weeks ago to Seattle and back round trip. Took the exit 2 miles from home to drop by the machihne shop that built my engine form, while at the stop light the temp started going up for the 180 it had been running at to about 220. The light changed to green and within a block it went back down to 180. Got to the machine shop, Lifted the hood and everyone came out to look at the build. Got lots of compliments. Asked about the temp change. They all looked it over and said not problem add a overflow cap the area beteeen the radiator and the grill to force the air through the radiator. No problem went home a did that the same day. Following weekend went to a rod run 8 miles round trip away total distance on engine 48 miles. On the way home overheating started again went up to 220 by the time I got home. Check the radiator not water showing. You know what I checked next of course the oil. Water in the oil. Still good oil pressure 60 lbs running 50 on idle. Called machine shop next day. Took in in the following day. They forgot to tighten down the ALU heads the third time after the Hot run blew both heat gaskets. All that needs rebuilding is being done at theri expense. will have back at home on Friday before I leave on vacation. Lucky to have a honest machine shop. Still smilling.
#116
Got a question, Jamsbo found a tri-power set up that is for a 400 on evel-bay that I think would would look great on the 455 in the 48 Olds. Will this set up fit on a 455. Maybe Joe knows
By the way I will be Tulsa on Wednesday morning. See you on Saturday I wll call ahead and let you know when I hit town.
By the way I will be Tulsa on Wednesday morning. See you on Saturday I wll call ahead and let you know when I hit town.
#117
#119
Got my 57 back from the machine shop after the blowen head gaskets. Not only did they fix the problem they re-jetted the carb and timed the engine as well. Is runs great. I also think I have found a posi unit, things are looking up. I will be hitting the road on Tuesday to pick up the 1948 Olds in Oklahoma. I will keep posting on my travels as I find an engine and 5 or 6 speed stick tranny in a new thread 1948 Olds build