1970 442 Compression Readings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 31, 2014 | 10:10 AM
  #1  
Johnd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 649
From: Raleigh NC
1970 442 Compression Readings

Well a few weeks ago, I borrowed a compression tool from a friend and the readings came back between 140 and 160. So I went out and bought a new compression tester (craftsman model). I tested again today and below are the readings:


1 150
2 150
3 160
4 150
5 155
6 150
7 160
8 150 - this one was a pain in the *** - came in at 140 - after tightening the hose it came in at 150


I tested with the motor cold - so do these numbers seem good?
Old Jan 31, 2014 | 10:16 AM
  #2  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
They look fine to me, though you're supposed to test it hot.

Did you do it with the throttle open?

- Eric
Old Jan 31, 2014 | 03:06 PM
  #3  
Johnd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 649
From: Raleigh NC
Hi Eric,


I was told it could be done on a cold engine but the readings would be lower. There is no way to do cylinder 8 on a car with AC when the engine is hot. It took me 15 minutes to connect it cold
Old Jan 31, 2014 | 03:23 PM
  #4  
crank shaft's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 248
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Make sure you hold the throttle wide open and do 5 puffs when cranking. You should not have more than a 20 percent variance between cylinders.
Old Jan 31, 2014 | 03:31 PM
  #5  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by crank shaft
You should not have more than a 20 percent variance between cylinders.
And, according to the numbers above, the maximum variation between cylinders was 10 psi, a 6.7% variation.

- Eric
Old Jan 31, 2014 | 03:37 PM
  #6  
crank shaft's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 248
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Yes. Thanks for the correction!
Old Jan 31, 2014 | 03:41 PM
  #7  
Johnd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 649
From: Raleigh NC
Guys,


Thanks for all the feedback... So would you bother ripping it apart or just do a rebuild of the top end and replace the gaskets
Old Jan 31, 2014 | 05:40 PM
  #8  
matt69olds's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,095
From: central Indiana
The textbook process is to warm the engine, disable the ignition, and remove all the plugs. Do the test with the throttle wide open.Crank the engine the same amount of time, and make sure the battery is in good enough condition to maintain constant cranking speed. As long as the numbers are consistent, within spec and within 10% highest and lowest your probably OK. A leakdown is more accurate for determining overall engine seal condition.
Old Jan 31, 2014 | 08:18 PM
  #9  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by Johnd
So would you bother ripping it apart or just do a rebuild of the top end and replace the gaskets
You've got great numbers there. Why do you want to mess with the engine?

- Eric
Old Jan 31, 2014 | 08:28 PM
  #10  
Sugar Bear's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,098
X2, those are excellent numbers. If it sounds good...no knocks, taps etc. leave it alone except for the timing chain. If the chain or gears are old then change the chain and both gears.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
68vert
Small Blocks
9
Jul 21, 2015 07:51 PM
oldsmobum
Small Blocks
10
Apr 13, 2012 04:34 PM
greenslade
Big Blocks
14
Mar 29, 2011 03:56 PM
jtriggy
Small Blocks
3
Aug 23, 2010 08:53 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:50 AM.