1970 W30 Qjet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old August 22nd, 2009 | 08:49 PM
  #1  
WhatIf's Avatar
Thread Starter
1970 442
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 238
From: Houston, Texas
1970 W30 Qjet

My friend was telling me that 1970 W30 Q-jets did not use primary metering rods. Is this true? If so could someone please explain how these could run at part throttle very well? Did they just use larger jets? Why did Olds choose not to use primary rods (if this is true?). Thank you.
Old August 22nd, 2009 | 10:00 PM
  #2  
bccan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,518
From: West Hartford, CT
1970 W30 & W31 4 speed cars did not use a primary piston or rods. 7040256 & 7040255 respectively, they used jets common to the 2 bbl carb, .057 or .058 iirc. Automatic cars used piston & rods w/ normal(.069 & bigger) jets & rods.

Last edited by bccan; August 22nd, 2009 at 10:12 PM.
Old August 23rd, 2009 | 07:53 AM
  #3  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,369
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by WhatIf
My friend was telling me that 1970 W30 Q-jets did not use primary metering rods. Is this true? If so could someone please explain how these could run at part throttle very well? Did they just use larger jets? Why did Olds choose not to use primary rods (if this is true?). Thank you.
Actually they used SMALLER jets since there wasn't a metering rod stuck in the middle of them. The power piston was removed because with the low vacuum of the 328 degree cam, the piston would have been in the up position all the time anyway.
Old August 23rd, 2009 | 11:04 AM
  #4  
WhatIf's Avatar
Thread Starter
1970 442
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 238
From: Houston, Texas
Ok - thank you! So the vacuum holds the piston down correct? With low vacuum the piston would be up all the time - correct? So they used smaller main jets because there were no rods - was this ok for part throttle?

Reason Im asking is that Im wondering what would happen if someone were to do this to a regular Qjet if they had a really radical cam. Is this what the Qjet rebuilders do when they setup a carb for a really wild combo? Were these carbs just as responsive as the regular Qjet , and were these only used on the 4spd cars?

You guys are great. Im so glad I found this site!!!
Old August 23rd, 2009 | 03:24 PM
  #5  
Bobsw32's Avatar
BobsW32
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 208
You have to define responsive as the W-30 and W31's I would consider somewhat lazy in the lower rpm's. I had a W-31 for 35 years and below 3500 it was a little lazy but from 3500 to 6500 hold on to your shorts......They were that way because of the BIG (long duration) cams that were installed...It idled, Kinda, at 8 inches of vacuum.....If you want to modify a regular quadrajet you will need to plug power piston port or you will have a huge vacume leak

Some of us would install 58 jets for the 57 and then grind about an 1/8 of an inch off the top of the accelerator pump to add more fuel on acceleration.....

and then would use a "long tip" (AX) secondary metering rod.

Last edited by Bobsw32; August 23rd, 2009 at 03:41 PM.
Old August 23rd, 2009 | 06:53 PM
  #6  
344870M's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 255
From: s/w PA
Back in the day of my youth and ignorance I took my W-30 4-spd to the local "expert" carb shop. I was told upon pick up of my freshly rebuilt carb that "somebody sure 'Mickey Moused' that carburetor of yours". After that the car just never ran as hard as it did it before it was rebuilt. I'm guessing that he was not familiar with how the W carb was set up and rebuilt it to regular Quadrajet specs. Would this be a fair assumption? And where can I find the exact specs for how this carb should be rebuilt?

It's been a looong time since I've driven this car but I remember before the rebuild there was a heavy bog at full throttle mash. But as soon as she caught her breath !!!!. After the rebuild, the bog wasn't as bad but the following acceleration; while still impressive, was shall we say not quite as......exhilarating.
Old August 24th, 2009 | 04:56 AM
  #7  
Bobsw32's Avatar
BobsW32
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 208
Your bog may be as simple as the secondary air valve adjustmnent. Are you knowledgeable about the Quadrajet?.... If not there are several very very reputable Quadrajet rebuilders who specialize in Oldsmobiles..I am not close enough to you or I would come over and do it.... I taught myself over the years.,......

Bob
Old August 24th, 2009 | 01:23 PM
  #8  
344870M's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 255
From: s/w PA
Originally Posted by Bobsw32
Your bog may be as simple as the secondary air valve adjustmnent. Are you knowledgeable about the Quadrajet?.... If not there are several very very reputable Quadrajet rebuilders who specialize in Oldsmobiles..I am not close enough to you or I would come over and do it.... I taught myself over the years.,......

Bob
Not at all. I could take the air horn off, look down inside of it and recognize most of what's there but not know what is or isn't supposed to be there.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
70-442-W30
442
16
September 2nd, 2024 11:47 PM
easyd
Parts Wanted
8
June 12th, 2013 04:05 AM
pcard
General Questions
4
March 15th, 2013 12:44 PM
Nickyloves442s
Parts For Sale
15
October 24th, 2012 04:55 PM
SuperNovass
Parts For Sale
2
April 1st, 2012 11:51 AM



Quick Reply: 1970 W30 Qjet



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:30 AM.