Tubular front control arms

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old July 24th, 2023, 05:18 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Rob64cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Green Cove Springs Florida
Posts: 92
Why so cheap? Tubular front control arms

A front drum to disc conversion turned into New springs and ball joints which turned into me needing all new bushings in the control arms how much turned into the shock mount holes being worn out and now I'm looking at tubular control arms. The snowball effect is consuming me but it's still fun... I'm looking at this set off of eBay for about $240. Seems too good to be true. Has anybody out there purchase these and have some mileage on them. Are they worth it? These are for a 64 Cutlass convertible not building a race car. Just a nice comfortable cruiser



Last edited by Rob64cutlass; July 24th, 2023 at 06:17 PM.
Rob64cutlass is offline  
Old July 24th, 2023, 06:30 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
woodie582's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Santa Rosa Ca
Posts: 398
I can’t speak to their quality but one of the last items I would compromise for price would be control arms.
woodie582 is online now  
Old July 24th, 2023, 06:34 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Rob64cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Green Cove Springs Florida
Posts: 92
Originally Posted by woodie582
I can’t speak to their quality but one of the last items I would compromise for price would be control arms.
Agreed. That's why I am reaching out to see if anybody has purchased and put these to the test.
Rob64cutlass is offline  
Old July 24th, 2023, 07:16 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Loaded68W34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,577
I have a set of them on my vista cruiser. I have been running them since 2014 or so from when I first put the air ride, wheels, and first set of 4-wheel disc brakes on (while the car was still otherwise stock). I am still running them now. They have done well for me. Don't expect a huge change in performance, but the Delrin bushings are nice especially for a car on air as rubber bushings will wear out fast. The only problem I have had with them is that the upper ball joints wore out. The car was my daily driver for about 3 years with these on. When I tore the car down to restore it, the upper ball joints were trashed. Keep in mind this was a car on air so the suspension went through full travel at least twice every time I drove it over those 3 years.

In these photos you will see where I modified mine with 1/8" and 1/4" (3/8" total) plates (welded and bolted) to accept the ridetech shockwaves.





Loaded68W34 is online now  
Old July 24th, 2023, 07:35 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Bubba68CS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 272
Originally Posted by woodie582
I can’t speak to their quality but one of the last items I would compromise for price would be control arms.
Especially when they're that much cheaper than anything from a brand name. I mean...ball joints are $80. A 4ft length of 1.625 x .120 DOM tubing is ~$100. So you've got about $50 left to cut and form the metal, weld it, buy/make bushings, install them, buy sway bar end links, install them, buy bump stops, install them, buy/make cross-shafts, install them, put it up on ebay, package it, ship it...

I'm quite certain they're getting things wholesale, but still, that is absolute bottom of the barrel pricing.
Bubba68CS is offline  
Old July 24th, 2023, 09:03 PM
  #6  
Proud Viet Nam Veteran
 
redoldsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rowlett, TX
Posts: 9,971
I have a set I bought for another project (57Chevy) I have not used. The welds are excellent. I would expect the ball joints to be cheaper and would probably change them if I were going to use them.
redoldsman is online now  
Old July 25th, 2023, 07:18 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Loaded68W34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,577
In addition to the set on the vista, I have a set on the 67 Camaro I am currently building for my dad. Again, no complaints.
Loaded68W34 is online now  
Old July 25th, 2023, 08:03 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
therobski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth
Posts: 3,116
My last build the 64 F85, I bit the bullet and went 100% Hotchkis front and rear...


therobski is offline  
Old July 26th, 2023, 02:03 PM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Rob64cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Green Cove Springs Florida
Posts: 92
Originally Posted by Loaded68W34
I have a set of them on my vista cruiser. I have been running them since 2014 or so from when I first put the air ride, wheels, and first set of 4-wheel disc brakes on (while the car was still otherwise stock). I am still running them now. They have done well for me. Don't expect a huge change in performance, but the Delrin bushings are nice especially for a car on air as rubber bushings will wear out fast. The only problem I have had with them is that the upper ball joints wore out. The car was my daily driver for about 3 years with these on. When I tore the car down to restore it, the upper ball joints were trashed. Keep in mind this was a car on air so the suspension went through full travel at least twice every time I drove it over those 3 years.

In these photos you will see where I modified mine with 1/8" and 1/4" (3/8" total) plates (welded and bolted) to accept the ridetech shockwaves.



Great pictures man! Thank you for the info. For 250 bucks I might have to order them. I'll post some pictures and reviews as I get them installed. Hopefully standard upper and lower ball joints will fit in them. I'll replace them with moogs and go from there.
Rob64cutlass is offline  
Old July 26th, 2023, 02:05 PM
  #10  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Rob64cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Green Cove Springs Florida
Posts: 92
Originally Posted by therobski
My last build the 64 F85, I bit the bullet and went 100% Hotchkis front and rear...

  1. Summit racings distribution center in Valdosta is only a couple hours from me. I was in there and looked at this chassis build with all QA1 suspension in it which it's listed as Chevelle but it's still all GM A body. But to go all QA1 with coilovers thousands of dollars. Not saying that it's not worth it but I am not pro touring rac





    ing this car hard to spend that kind of money.
  1. ​​​​

Last edited by Rob64cutlass; July 26th, 2023 at 02:10 PM. Reason: Added photos
Rob64cutlass is offline  
Old July 26th, 2023, 02:39 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
therobski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth
Posts: 3,116
I don't know what current prices are but they have to be a lot more than what I paid. I did install QA1 adjustable rear shocks and Hotchkis tuned Bilstein shocks in the front.


therobski is offline  
Old July 28th, 2023, 07:09 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
newmexguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Las Cruces NM 88005
Posts: 905
Originally Posted by Bubba68CS
Especially when they're that much cheaper than anything from a brand name. I mean...ball joints are $80. A 4ft length of 1.625 x .120 DOM tubing is ~$100. So you've got about $50 left to cut and form the metal, weld it, buy/make bushings, install them, buy sway bar end links, install them, buy bump stops, install them, buy/make cross-shafts, install them, put it up on ebay, package it, ship it...

I'm quite certain they're getting things wholesale, but still, that is absolute bottom of the barrel pricing.
There is a discussion on the "Nova" site, it might be "Steves" about how a ball joint tore, or snapped out of an offshore control arm. Metallurgy issues. Personally am not into these tubulars, but if one was hell-bent on getting them, source from a domestic company that makes them here.
newmexguy is offline  
Old July 31st, 2023, 07:24 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
oddball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 1,847
I used a set of the import generic front lower arms ~10 years ago, so things might have changed. These are the same from a number of vendors under a number a different brand names. Basically any tubular arm that is crazy cheap is coming from the same plant. These are copies of Hotchkiss arms.
1) I got the delrin bushings and they were cut with a pocket knife. Replaced with parts from Hotchkiss
2) the ball joints were extremely stiff. The pocket was machined too small, so the balljoint housing pinched down on the ball. This also trashed the replacement balljoints that I was eventually able to force in there. I ended up paying a shop to resize the holes. Naturally, they overshot one of them and didn't tell me. I figured it out when the balljoint fell out while working on it. They agreed to sleeve and re-machine it.
3) the outer face of the pocket is very large. This is fine on a standard setup, but mine had lowering springs. This pushed the wall of the pocket into the disk brake backing plate which pushed into the disk. Destroyed the plate, disk and pads on both sides. I was able to grind down the pocket and hog out bigger holes in the backing plates to make it work.

So, yeah, they work, but I wouldn't recommend them. I've switched to SPC arms since then.
oddball is offline  
Old August 1st, 2023, 07:32 PM
  #14  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Rob64cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Green Cove Springs Florida
Posts: 92
Originally Posted by oddball
I used a set of the import generic front lower arms ~10 years ago, so things might have changed. These are the same from a number of vendors under a number a different brand names. Basically any tubular arm that is crazy cheap is coming from the same plant. These are copies of Hotchkiss arms.
1) I got the delrin bushings and they were cut with a pocket knife. Replaced with parts from Hotchkiss
2) the ball joints were extremely stiff. The pocket was machined too small, so the balljoint housing pinched down on the ball. This also trashed the replacement balljoints that I was eventually able to force in there. I ended up paying a shop to resize the holes. Naturally, they overshot one of them and didn't tell me. I figured it out when the balljoint fell out while working on it. They agreed to sleeve and re-machine it.
3) the outer face of the pocket is very large. This is fine on a standard setup, but mine had lowering springs. This pushed the wall of the pocket into the disk brake backing plate which pushed into the disk. Destroyed the plate, disk and pads on both sides. I was able to grind down the pocket and hog out bigger holes in the backing plates to make it work.

So, yeah, they work, but I wouldn't recommend them. I've switched to SPC arms since then.
Very awesome! This is great feedback exactly what I was looking for. Sorry you had to be the one to experience the butt kicking on them but that's what makes these forums so great is hopefully when one of us experiences some BS we can share it and hopefully help the next guy into not having the same situation! Again, thank you very much, greatly appreciate it!
Rob64cutlass is offline  
Old August 3rd, 2023, 09:17 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
oddball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 1,847
Say someone has a completely rotted set of stock front arms and really limited budget - they'd still be worthwhile.

But it's notable that I threw mine away instead of trying to sell them.
oddball is offline  
Old November 16th, 2023, 03:40 PM
  #16  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Rob64cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Green Cove Springs Florida
Posts: 92
So I bought the cheap ones. Figured it'd be worth a shot to see what it's all about. Maybe educate all of us on why they are cheap... Finally getting around to fitting them for install. Here they are side by side with the stock upper and lower control arms.. The lowers seem to line right up with OEM spec dimensions,. Question is on the upper. The top ball joint seems to be about an inch and 5/8 off from stock towards the rear. Is this normal? Or maybe this is why they were so cheap... Let me know some feedback guys. I appreciate it.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
PXL_20231116_232316022.jpg (1.63 MB, 5 views)
File Type: jpg
PXL_20231116_232430604.jpg (1.18 MB, 5 views)
File Type: jpg
PXL_20231116_232519278.jpg (1.25 MB, 6 views)
File Type: jpg
PXL_20231116_232546536.jpg (1,007.9 KB, 6 views)
Rob64cutlass is offline  
Old November 16th, 2023, 04:37 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
fleming442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mt.Ary, MD
Posts: 2,908
It's one of 2 things: they're either on the wrong sides or they're caster corrected. These cars caster spec wasn't much compared to today's standards. If you end up with 3-5⁰, it will be more stable at high speeds.
fleming442 is offline  
Old November 17th, 2023, 06:11 AM
  #18  
Rodney
 
cdrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,327
Most of the aftermarket control arms have additional positive caster built into their design; typically 1-2 degrees. This allows for more modern alignment settings than the 50-year old factory specs without excessive shimming at the frame mounts. From your picture, the upper balljoint mount in the tubular arm is moved about 1" to the rear (which seems like a lot to me). The factory spindle is about 7-1/2" tall, adding 1-1/2" for the upper and 1-1/2" for the lower balljoints the overall height of the spindle is around 10-1/2" from the upper pivot point to the lower. Using trig I calculate the caster angle to be around +5 degrees of caster (without shims). The most I could ever get out of the stock components was +3 degrees with lots of shims at the frame mounts.

Rodney

Last edited by cdrod; November 17th, 2023 at 10:19 AM.
cdrod is offline  
Old November 17th, 2023, 06:23 AM
  #19  
Registered User
 
bccan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: West Hartford, CT
Posts: 1,427
Originally Posted by cdrod
Most of the aftermarket control arms have additional negative caster built into their design; typically 1-2 degrees. This allows for more modern alignment settings than the 50-year old factory specs without excessive shimming at the frame mounts. From your picture, the upper balljoint mount in the tubular arm is moved about 1" to the rear (which seems like a lot to me). The factory spindle is about 7-1/2" tall, adding 1-1/2" for the upper and 1-1/2" for the lower balljoints the overall height of the spindle is around 10-1/2" from the upper pivot point to the lower. Using trig I calculate the caster angle to be around -5 degrees of caster (without shims). The most I could ever get out of the stock components was -3 degrees with lots of shims at the frame mounts.

Rodney
Aftermarket arms tend to build in and allow for more POSITIVE caster.

​​​​​​….
bccan is offline  
Old November 17th, 2023, 08:04 AM
  #20  
Registered User
 
Hammerdrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 276
Weren't there instructions included with the product giving the new desired alignment specs showing the change in caster ??
Hammerdrop is offline  
Old November 17th, 2023, 10:20 AM
  #21  
Rodney
 
cdrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,327
bccan:
Oops, I shouldn't post too early in the morning; we want more positive caster and a bit of negative camber. I corrected my previous post.

Rodney
cdrod is offline  
Old November 17th, 2023, 10:58 AM
  #22  
Registered User
 
bccan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: West Hartford, CT
Posts: 1,427
Now we’re on the same side!
bccan is offline  
Old November 19th, 2023, 07:07 PM
  #23  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Rob64cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Green Cove Springs Florida
Posts: 92
Originally Posted by Hammerdrop
Weren't there instructions included with the product giving the new desired alignment specs showing the change in caster ??
Nope. Typical with Amazon and eBay cheap parts. They do not come with instructions. just the part.
Rob64cutlass is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cbartonbrown
General Discussion
12
October 7th, 2019 08:26 AM
FIRST 442
Parts For Sale
0
June 5th, 2012 05:38 AM
501Paratrooper
Chassis/Body/Frame
0
May 7th, 2012 11:25 AM
Impin'
Suspension & Handling
8
April 20th, 2012 09:36 AM
johnspd22
General Discussion
11
October 29th, 2010 07:41 PM



Quick Reply: Tubular front control arms



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:40 AM.