Diesel block or gas block with band aid for higher power

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old December 21st, 2020, 10:10 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HighwayStar 442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Laguna Vista, TX
Posts: 1,628
Diesel block or gas block with band aid for higher power

Looked at a Olds diesel blocks for the first time, up close and personal. As the old lady, from the commercial years ago! Where is the beef? It's on the bottom end of the diesel blocks at least! Why put money into a gas 350. Adding straps, halo, grdle, etc. To hope the bottom end does not grenade. I could see most of the obstacles to convert. Which I can do myself without the machine shop. No one will see anyway.as they are internal. It will not look pretty, but will function. Have the machine shop do the normal work you would for a gas block. Some parts from RR made for the diesel block. And new rotating assembly. Using parts from my existing engine. Heads, intake , etc.

My car is setup to take around 600 HP, 650 TQ. Add body stiffeners, Extreme Automatic 2004r Stage 2, beefed up 10 bolt 8.5 rear (will replace if beakes). Electric fans, elect fuel pump, elect water pump, Powermaster XS starter, oil pressure switch to elect fuel pump, davies-craig digital gauge thermatic fan / EWP switch kit, Air/ Fuel meter. Bernard Mondello Speedmaster heads, Edelbrock 7111 ported by me to match heads. Big brakes, suspension upgrades. To me anything 700 HP and over on the street. Inexperienced guys are wrecking and killing themselves.

I am not an engine builder. Have assembled some engines. A few lawn mowers, mini bikes, motorcycles, Nissan 4 banger and the 350 SBO in my car now. Done in 2011 and still alive. Nothing special in the internals..Not that I drive her all the time or serious racing. But not gentle on her either. Taken the engine more than a fews times passed the 6k rpm. But never over 6.5k, each time waiting for it to blow up.

Had a engine builder in Charlotte NC. Do the short block, who did a F**KED UP job. And not put in what I wanted. I disassembled and check everything. Fixing what I found wrong. Guess I did a OK job.





HighwayStar 442 is offline  
Old December 21st, 2020, 10:50 AM
  #2  
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melville, Saskatchewan
Posts: 8,981
The general consensus is 650 hp for a 350 gas block. On the old ROP, one guy had 900+ hp turbo using a 350 gas block. He had light parts and full girdle and built a diesel block for when it died. That is like playing catch with a grenade, it could go boom at any minute😁. I am building a 350 gas block mainly from parts collected for a 403 build. I don't want the overheating and flimsy block issues. I am hoping for 450/450 with Mahle 2618 forged pistons in a 4.065" bore with a 1.55" compression height, Scat sbc 6" long, 2" journal with a 330 offset ground 330 crank, 6000 rpm max. I collected a 1/2" 4 main CNC Halo girdle, it is going on. The Halo may just be a handy handle to lift out what is left of your block. It really depends on the power goals and planned rpm. Hopefully some of the experts chime in,.
olds 307 and 403 is online now  
Old December 21st, 2020, 11:30 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
bccan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: West Hartford, CT
Posts: 1,436
The devil in the diesel is the crank. You can run the D crank but good luck reaching your horsepower goals with 350ci. Parallel option is main bearing spacers with 2.5” journal 330 crank=$$$ and limited benefit.

Next option is 425 crank, like Pee Wee Herman said, “ might as well stroke it if ya got it.” That’s a $1k-1.5k expense by the time all the appropriate work is done. Stroker custom crank is the best option but again, lotsa greenbacks. Good news is that I think Mark Remmel has that angle covered with a reasonably priced offering, under $2k iirc, crankshaft suppliers can do some really slick pieces but those are $3k range. Maybe some of the other Olds specialists have a crank or rotating assy available but not sure.


https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...cranks-145671/

————

Last edited by bccan; December 21st, 2020 at 11:45 AM.
bccan is offline  
Old December 21st, 2020, 11:51 AM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HighwayStar 442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Laguna Vista, TX
Posts: 1,628
Would it pay to use Bearing Spacers for 350 forged crankshaft in the diesel? Bill T. DX block 4 bolt steel main caps 2.5". Lighting the rotating assembly, less friction? Full girdle must cost at least $2,500 installed for a gas block. Put that towards the diesel block. Would like to go at least 7,000 rpm.

High revs shifting with Lighting Rods is a thrill ride for me!! Gas pedal to the floor, never let up. Move the shifter 1/2'' and instantaneous to next gear. It just really jumps up and tears ***. I guess ask any racer with Lenco shifter.
HighwayStar 442 is offline  
Old December 21st, 2020, 12:11 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HighwayStar 442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Laguna Vista, TX
Posts: 1,628
Old info, but interesting.
https://mondelloperformance.com/wp-c...rSB440Olds.pdf
HighwayStar 442 is offline  
Old December 21st, 2020, 03:04 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,871
Originally Posted by HighwayStar 442
Would it pay to use Bearing Spacers for 350 forged crankshaft in the diesel? Bill T. DX block 4 bolt steel main caps 2.5". Lighting the rotating assembly, less friction? Full girdle must cost at least $2,500 installed for a gas block. Put that towards the diesel block. Would like to go at least 7,000 rpm.

High revs shifting with Lighting Rods is a thrill ride for me!! Gas pedal to the floor, never let up. Move the shifter 1/2'' and instantaneous to next gear. It just really jumps up and tears ***. I guess ask any racer with Lenco shifter.
No such thing as a forged “350” crank, technically it’s really a 330 crank.
Bill and others don’t really want to fool with spacers anymore seeing as how you can machine a 400/425 crank, buy my billet stroker crank or have someone like Bryant or Moldex do one for you.
The downside to using the bigger main is the added bearing speed. The upside to the bigger main is that it makes the crank even stronger. However either way even a diesel block will most likely break before any aftermarket crank does.
cutlassefi is online now  
Old December 21st, 2020, 03:47 PM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HighwayStar 442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Laguna Vista, TX
Posts: 1,628
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
No such thing as a forged “350” crank, technically it’s really a 330 crank.
Bill and others don’t really want to fool with spacers anymore seeing as how you can machine a 400/425 crank, buy my billet stroker crank or have someone like Bryant or Moldex do one for you.
The downside to using the bigger main is the added bearing speed. The upside to the bigger main is that it makes the crank even stronger. However either way even a diesel block will most likely break before any aftermarket crank does.
I know you said what the weight of each of your canks some place on here? Spinning the 3'' mains cranks to 7,000 rpm in D or DX possible with your max length billet stroker with your rods and pistons? Rotating assembly is lighter and stronger. 4 bolt mains or two bolts mains. I always get the thickest best push rods.
HighwayStar 442 is offline  
Old December 21st, 2020, 04:10 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,871
Originally Posted by HighwayStar 442
I know you said what the weight of each of your canks some place on here? Spinning the 3'' mains cranks to 7,000 rpm in D or DX possible with your max length billet stroker with your rods and pistons? Rotating assembly is lighter and stronger. 4 bolt mains or two bolts mains. I always get the thickest best push rods.
About 56# for the smaller main, most likely low 60’s for the large main.
7k would be real doable with these cranks but if it quits making power well below that then it’s a waste.
cutlassefi is online now  
Old December 21st, 2020, 05:51 PM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HighwayStar 442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Laguna Vista, TX
Posts: 1,628
Crower Oldsmobile Mechanical Flat Tappet Camshaft Part Number: 56360 Oldsmobile
Performance level 3
- Compu-Pro - High revving, super mid to top end power.
INT/EXH - Dur @ .050” Lift: 238°/242° RR: 1.6/1.6 Gross Lift: .526”/.539” LSA: 110° RPM: 3000 to 7000 Redline: 7500

And a Victor Olds 350 Intake Manifold
HighwayStar 442 is offline  
Old December 21st, 2020, 07:11 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,871
Originally Posted by HighwayStar 442
Crower Oldsmobile Mechanical Flat Tappet Camshaft Part Number: 56360 Oldsmobile
Performance level 3
- Compu-Pro - High revving, super mid to top end power.
INT/EXH - Dur @ .050” Lift: 238°/242° RR: 1.6/1.6 Gross Lift: .526”/.539” LSA: 110° RPM: 3000 to 7000 Redline: 7500

And a Victor Olds 350 Intake Manifold
Even with that cam you’ll need pretty good heads to make power to 7k. So it really doesn’t make sense to limit lift to low .500’s.
cutlassefi is online now  
Old January 12th, 2021, 10:10 AM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HighwayStar 442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Laguna Vista, TX
Posts: 1,628
From =AZWrlWnPqGiq02ZUkITpgwRKVkH2UTrJhCpkIRXLLbVP92BB3 bWWMsV3LJURmFmcPPfp49oG6RGQiCl43A7Ef7SfOpn5qoagnV8 gQYylvBO7boRks8fNUAAivwPq0VDqC_YTIzCRMwd1ULL-uHnrq98seUAAnMESGCytG3EhxR_KI0U2t-CzW2KiQ8MMyVDFnqw&__tn__=R]-R]Bill Trovato on another sit

Author
.921 lifter bores normally would need to get bushed to run a .842, .875 or .904 lifter. There is a significant cost for that. You have to put the block up on the machine, set it up, machine, remove, clean, install the bushings that you have machining time into, put back on machine, re set up, ream, take back off, then hone slightly fit. In the case of the .937 lifter, just ream from .921 to .937. You get a the most robust lifter in which you basically can't hurt.
HighwayStar 442 is offline  
Old January 12th, 2021, 05:56 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Kyle's77cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ste Rose Manitoba Canada
Posts: 643
Originally Posted by HighwayStar 442
From =AZWrlWnPqGiq02ZUkITpgwRKVkH2UTrJhCpkIRXLLbVP92BB3 bWWMsV3LJURmFmcPPfp49oG6RGQiCl43A7Ef7SfOpn5qoagnV8 gQYylvBO7boRks8fNUAAivwPq0VDqC_YTIzCRMwd1ULL-uHnrq98seUAAnMESGCytG3EhxR_KI0U2t-CzW2KiQ8MMyVDFnqw&__tn__=R]-R]Bill Trovato on another sit

Author
.921 lifter bores normally would need to get bushed to run a .842, .875 or .904 lifter. There is a significant cost for that. You have to put the block up on the machine, set it up, machine, remove, clean, install the bushings that you have machining time into, put back on machine, re set up, ream, take back off, then hone slightly fit. In the case of the .937 lifter, just ream from .921 to .937. You get a the most robust lifter in which you basically can't hurt.

link is broken. Can't even copy paste.
Interesting with using a bigger lifter
Kyle's77cutlass is offline  
Old January 12th, 2021, 07:52 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,871
That .937 Lifter is solid only you know right?
And it’s not quite that easy. You’ll need a reamer that’s close to .937 then they get honed to size. You need to remove the tool marks etc. so you can’t go right to .937.
cutlassefi is online now  
Old January 12th, 2021, 09:12 PM
  #14  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HighwayStar 442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Laguna Vista, TX
Posts: 1,628
Originally Posted by Kyle's77cutlass
link is broken. Can't even copy paste.
Interesting with using a bigger lifter
I am not a engine builder. Bill calls out Mechanical roller and Hydraulic roller cam. A little confusing what he is saying to me.at first. Short video of riming lifter bore on there. I am sure its not cheap. But rollers.

Also adding blower. I be happy with just an 100 HP shot.NOS.

BT - It is a hydraulic roller cam. Running a mechanical roller lifter at 0 lash. I can assure you, it won't collapse, it won't stick, it will be more reliable, the engine will rev higher, and it will make more power. Win, win.


HighwayStar 442 is offline  
Old January 13th, 2021, 07:49 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
oddball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 1,855
You can run mechanical lifters on a cam designed for hydraulic lifters. You get a bit more duration than with the hydraulic and it's a bit more mild than a cam designed for solid lifters. It's a trick that's sometimes useful if the cam lobe you want is only available as a hydraulic but you want, or are limited to, a solid lifter.

Note that when folks say a "hydraulic" cam or a "solid" cam, they're referring to some design details of the lobe. Solid lobes are more aggressive than hydraulic lobes because hydraulic lifters need softer ramps to take care of the plunger and bits inside the lifter. No bits in the solid lifter, so the designer can have more fun.

Yeah, I bet going up in lifter side is "easier" than bushing down, but "easier" is a relative term......

Some folks are using the stock .921 roller lifters. They're fine if your cam profile is mild enough.
oddball is offline  
Old January 13th, 2021, 08:34 AM
  #16  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HighwayStar 442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Laguna Vista, TX
Posts: 1,628
Originally Posted by oddball
You can run mechanical lifters on a cam designed for hydraulic lifters. You get a bit more duration than with the hydraulic and it's a bit more mild than a cam designed for solid lifters. It's a trick that's sometimes useful if the cam lobe you want is only available as a hydraulic but you want, or are limited to, a solid lifter.

Note that when folks say a "hydraulic" cam or a "solid" cam, they're referring to some design details of the lobe. Solid lobes are more aggressive than hydraulic lobes because hydraulic lifters need softer ramps to take care of the plunger and bits inside the lifter. No bits in the solid lifter, so the designer can have more fun.

Yeah, I bet going up in lifter side is "easier" than bushing down, but "easier" is a relative term......

Some folks are using the stock .921 roller lifters. They're fine if your cam profile is mild enough.
Just saying, for you all out guys and drag racers who want roller lifters.

Me personally I am fine with the hydraulic lifter non -roller .921 in a DX build. With around 550 HP and a shot of NOS. Just do not want the bottom end to grenade. Not big on the band aids trying to hold it together on gas blocks.

Another thing. Guys on the Olds Diesel & Diesel websites. Talk about the "D" block threaded holes for heads and mains not drilled and taped deep enough. Causing problems. Have you engine builder seem that?
HighwayStar 442 is offline  
Old January 13th, 2021, 08:41 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
Kyle's77cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ste Rose Manitoba Canada
Posts: 643
Originally Posted by HighwayStar 442
Just saying, for you all out guys and drag racers who want roller lifters.

Me personally I am fine with the hydraulic lifter non -roller .921 in a DX build. With around 550 HP and a shot of NOS. Just do not want the bottom end to grenade. Not big on the band aids trying to hold it together on gas blocks.

Another thing. Guys on the Olds Diesel & Diesel websites. Talk about the "D" block threaded holes for heads and mains not drilled and taped deep enough. Causing problems. Have you engine builder seem that?

The man to talk to is Mark, he is a guru when it comes to Olds
Kyle's77cutlass is offline  
Old January 13th, 2021, 08:48 AM
  #18  
Registered User
 
Kyle's77cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ste Rose Manitoba Canada
Posts: 643
Originally Posted by HighwayStar 442
Just saying, for you all out guys and drag racers who want roller lifters.

Me personally I am fine with the hydraulic lifter non -roller .921 in a DX build. With around 550 HP and a shot of NOS. Just do not want the bottom end to grenade. Not big on the band aids trying to hold it together on gas blocks.

Another thing. Guys on the Olds Diesel & Diesel websites. Talk about the "D" block threaded holes for heads and mains not drilled and taped deep enough. Causing problems. Have you engine builder seem that?
The diesel had 22:1 compression. Way too much for the standard head bolt. Would stretch and blow head gaskets, even snap bolts.
Turing it to a gas block, won't have issues. Use ARP studs too boot

I have 450 HP and 490 TQ in my sons 350 block from 73. Just under 9.5:1 compression and using ARP bolts.
So you bump 100 more HP, don't see an issue. I be more worried with rotating assembly
Kyle's77cutlass is offline  
Old January 13th, 2021, 09:12 AM
  #19  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HighwayStar 442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Laguna Vista, TX
Posts: 1,628
"D" block threaded holes for heads and mains not drilled and taped deep enough? Easy fix, drill and tap. I thinking of the all out guys. Not worried on my future build. Understanding 22:1 compression problem and rotating assembly.

Another thing interesting thing that BT using is aluminium rods. Not your father's aluminium rods. New type. Huge money? Not for me! Other than education. And like anything else, you have to take it with a grain of salt.
HighwayStar 442 is offline  
Old January 13th, 2021, 09:52 AM
  #20  
Registered User
 
Kyle's77cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ste Rose Manitoba Canada
Posts: 643
Originally Posted by HighwayStar 442
"D" block threaded holes for heads and mains not drilled and taped deep enough? Easy fix, drill and tap. I thinking of the all out guys. Not worried on my future build. Understanding 22:1 compression problem and rotating assembly.

Another thing interesting thing that BT using is aluminium rods. Not your father's aluminium rods. New type. Huge money? Not for me! Other than education. And like anything else, you have to take it with a grain of salt.

​​​​​​ BT using is aluminium rods????
Kyle's77cutlass is offline  
Old January 13th, 2021, 10:18 AM
  #21  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HighwayStar 442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Laguna Vista, TX
Posts: 1,628
=AZVSs_WTs3KHcoiD6SU46zgOh-nfcibGFc2wiVawKf_kFlX6FkAPUONgH54Pc27Rv794oazJGGSA x8BeKi78MUOFICZa26oNvIecIv257X6H4Hn8bxtjlDRgc2uirb Dbu1MZ8GpjHaBQVom8qSzVkpfvzjjTR6TsZ6BLGD_h95B68lz5 O_10K05QP6ZiJwLCMvs&__tn__=R]-R]Brian Trick
These are NOT the aluminum rods of yesterday. Better material to withstand the hot-cold cycles of a street engine. I have them in mine as well.

Sorry I can not get the link to work. But from the BT Facebook Oldsmobile Max Performance

Look very meaty to me. Better tech. High dollar I am sure. For the DX block with Supercharger

HighwayStar 442 is offline  
Old January 13th, 2021, 10:29 AM
  #22  
Registered User
 
Kyle's77cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ste Rose Manitoba Canada
Posts: 643
Shat!!! Looks pricey
Not too sure about aluminum rods tho. IMO
Are those bearings black?

Kyle's77cutlass is offline  
Old January 13th, 2021, 10:33 AM
  #23  
Registered User
 
Kyle's77cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ste Rose Manitoba Canada
Posts: 643
Just sent to join. lol
Kyle's77cutlass is offline  
Old January 13th, 2021, 10:36 AM
  #24  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HighwayStar 442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Laguna Vista, TX
Posts: 1,628
Originally Posted by Kyle's77cutlass
Shat!!! Looks pricey
Not too sure about aluminum rods tho. IMO
Are those bearings black?
Deep down you like that idea? Don't lie
HighwayStar 442 is offline  
Old January 13th, 2021, 10:55 AM
  #25  
Registered User
 
Kyle's77cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ste Rose Manitoba Canada
Posts: 643
Originally Posted by HighwayStar 442
Deep down you like that idea? Don't lie
Bearings look cool but aluminium rods? Not sold on those.
Titanium yes
Kyle's77cutlass is offline  
Old January 13th, 2021, 11:12 AM
  #26  
Registered User
 
Kyle's77cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ste Rose Manitoba Canada
Posts: 643
Kyle's77cutlass is offline  
Old January 13th, 2021, 04:41 PM
  #27  
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melville, Saskatchewan
Posts: 8,981
Originally Posted by Kyle's77cutlass
Bearings look cool but aluminium rods? Not sold on those.
Titanium yes
Bruce has them in his offset ground 425 crank BBO. They didn't fail despite pistons being destroyed from a valve coming apart. As you know, everything is a far drive on the Prairies and even Bill Travato questions using them on something being drove hundreds of miles at a time. Yeah, I can imagine how much Titanium rods cost, chi ching$$$. Good steel rods are way lighter and stronger than stock, guess it depends on your RPM goals.
olds 307 and 403 is online now  
Old January 13th, 2021, 05:24 PM
  #28  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,871
A few things;
New style/material aluminum rods are fine for the street, no matter what Trovato says.
BUT aluminum rods are really best suited to high boost and/or serious nitrous applications as they absorb shock better than a steel rod.
Yes I’m aware the .937 Lifter is a solid, I wasn’t sure if you did. However when using that or any solid lifter on a lobe designed for a Hyd, a few things come into play. One is you lose effective duration when going from a Hyd to a solid. Second different profiles and parts combinations will dictate lash. It’s not really 0.
cutlassefi is online now  
Old August 9th, 2022, 02:53 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
VORTECPRO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 1,719
I got a interesting phone call today from the builder of this Olds stroker, seems a engine assembler on these Olds forums would like "supporting data" on the dyno testing of this engine, hmmm very interesting. It seems there is a question as too the 1.38 per inch TQ out put, I looked at the data supplied and it seems inline to me.
VORTECPRO is offline  
Old August 9th, 2022, 02:58 PM
  #30  
Registered User
 
VORTECPRO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 1,719
Talking

Originally Posted by HighwayStar 442
Deep down you like that idea? Don't lie
I like it..........always follow the builders advice
VORTECPRO is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
crazymathlefou
Small Blocks
10
December 10th, 2017 07:39 PM
oldsmoboogie
Small Blocks
3
August 27th, 2017 07:11 PM
76olds
Small Blocks
14
November 6th, 2016 07:49 AM
whiskey runner
Racing and High Performance
5
March 22nd, 2014 11:45 AM
swansmaa
Small Blocks
9
February 15th, 2013 03:42 PM



Quick Reply: Diesel block or gas block with band aid for higher power



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:48 AM.