My 68' W machine dream build
#1
My 68' W machine dream build
A little background before getting into my build, when I was 15 years old back in 1996 I have purchased my first olds, it was a saffron yellow 68' "S" with a 250 6cyl. After selling it after a year or so, I searched for 12 years looking for the perfect project car, needless to say I found it a few months back in downtown Atlanta.
This is a frame off restoration of my 68' Cutlass "S". It will follow a theme of a dream ordered 455 68' W-30 with all the goodies.
I bought it as a non-running mostly complete car. Hope you guys enjoy the pictures and the progress.
IMG_0637.jpg
IMG_0639.jpg
IMG_0640.jpg
This is a frame off restoration of my 68' Cutlass "S". It will follow a theme of a dream ordered 455 68' W-30 with all the goodies.
I bought it as a non-running mostly complete car. Hope you guys enjoy the pictures and the progress.
IMG_0637.jpg
IMG_0639.jpg
IMG_0640.jpg
#2
It didn't take me long to tear into it. Glad to see if finally underway.
IMG_0666.jpg
IMG_0665.jpg
IMG_0667.jpg
IMG_0666.jpg
IMG_0665.jpg
IMG_0667.jpg
#7
Nice ride, doesn't look like anybody messed with it too much at all.
Is the oil filler tube supposed to be gold and have a bend in it on those??? Document and mark that carefully so you can get the angulation correct on assembly.
Is the oil filler tube supposed to be gold and have a bend in it on those??? Document and mark that carefully so you can get the angulation correct on assembly.
#8
Resto-mod clone would be the best explanation of direction. I will built it as I would have like to had it ordered in 1968 as a 455 W-30 car then installed the usual fun bolt-on's like ceramic headers, aftermarket exhaust, beefed up suspension. I know I want to do the W-30 ram air package, woodgrain steering wheel, power disk brakes (currenly this car has manual 4-way drums yuck). It'll be fun watching it evolve.
#9
Besides breaking 2-3 prongs off of almost every trim piece it wasn't too messed with it. Rust on the car is minimal, it will need both l/h and r/h fender patches, and some light floor pan and trunk work. But these days its tough to find anything worth saving for price I paid for this one.
#11
Resto-mod clone would be the best explanation of direction. I will built it as I would have like to had it ordered in 1968 as a 455 W-30 car then installed the usual fun bolt-on's like ceramic headers, aftermarket exhaust, beefed up suspension. I know I want to do the W-30 ram air package, woodgrain steering wheel, power disk brakes (currenly this car has manual 4-way drums yuck). It'll be fun watching it evolve.
However, it wouldn't be original anyway, so I think you're better off with the 455: More cubes, more easily available (thus cheaper) parts, and the long stroke 400 G motors ('68-'69 400s) just don't hold up as well.
#13
The 68-9 400 is the same as a 455 save for the piston diameter. They are as rugged as any other Olds V8.
My 69 442 400/325hp had 85k when I bought it as a 19y/o and I drove it to 170k and it didn't burn or drip a drop of oil. Only thing that engine ever needed was a timing set at 160k and what Olds didn't?
Turned 14.4 at 96 so it ran strong also.
Good luck with the clone build, RTTOY.
Last edited by Techmaven; March 7th, 2009 at 03:08 PM.
#14
You and many others may have had good experiences with them, but they were *not* as rugged as *any* of the the other big blocks from .65 up. The long stroke design was not as good, and they more likely to (and did) launch pistons. This isn't my opinion, this is the experience of a lot Olds owners and even the factory backed racers of the day. Take a poll of Olds racers and ask them if they'd race one. Ask Mondello and Dick Miller if they recommend building up one.
#15
#16
#17
You and many others may have had good experiences with them, but they were *not* as rugged as *any* of the the other big blocks from .65 up. The long stroke design was not as good, and they more likely to (and did) launch pistons. This isn't my opinion, this is the experience of a lot Olds owners and even the factory backed racers of the day. Take a poll of Olds racers and ask them if they'd race one. Ask Mondello and Dick Miller if they recommend building up one.
You'll never catch me slandering a long stroke 400.
Last edited by MN71W30; March 7th, 2009 at 10:10 PM.
#18
I couldn't dissagree more, I have only seen 65-67 400's blown including a batch of 425's, not the stroker 400. I pounded a 68 for years and ran 13.93@97 stock with the exhaust hooked up. I had a friend pound one for 15 years. I've never seen one blown. In stock form they run close to their advertised HP numbers. I've heard all the arguments, but I just haven't seen the proof. It doesn't make sense to build one because of the lack of cubes and cost of parts compared to a 455. Believe what you want
You'll never catch me slandering a long stroke 400.
You'll never catch me slandering a long stroke 400.
"Over Square, Under Square The G-block Olds 400 (1968 - 1969) has the worst bore-to-stroke ratio of any American V-8 ever made. Period. The undersquare 455 isn't too great, either. Of course, the Olds 350 has about the best bore/stroke ratio of any GM 350 motor. [ Thanks to Joe Padavano for this information ]"
I wouldn't say they are extremely weak, but they are just not as durable as the other Olds big blocks. I know I can dig up more on this, but quite frankly this is the first time I've ever heard it argued that they are as durable.
#19
Hyjacked thread
I don't doubt what you say. And I'm not slandering the 400Gs. Though you've never seen the proof, it is out there. Our own Joe P from Oldsmobile Wiki:
"Over Square, Under Square The G-block Olds 400 (1968 - 1969) has the worst bore-to-stroke ratio of any American V-8 ever made. Period.
"Over Square, Under Square The G-block Olds 400 (1968 - 1969) has the worst bore-to-stroke ratio of any American V-8 ever made. Period.
IMHO of course.
#20
I don't doubt what you say. And I'm not slandering the 400Gs. Though you've never seen the proof, it is out there. Our own Joe P from Oldsmobile Wiki:
"Over Square, Under Square The G-block Olds 400 (1968 - 1969) has the worst bore-to-stroke ratio of any American V-8 ever made. Period. The undersquare 455 isn't too great, either. Of course, the Olds 350 has about the best bore/stroke ratio of any GM 350 motor. [ Thanks to Joe Padavano for this information ]"
I wouldn't say they are extremely weak, but they are just not as durable as the other Olds big blocks. I know I can dig up more on this, but quite frankly this is the first time I've ever heard it argued that they are as durable.
"Over Square, Under Square The G-block Olds 400 (1968 - 1969) has the worst bore-to-stroke ratio of any American V-8 ever made. Period. The undersquare 455 isn't too great, either. Of course, the Olds 350 has about the best bore/stroke ratio of any GM 350 motor. [ Thanks to Joe Padavano for this information ]"
I wouldn't say they are extremely weak, but they are just not as durable as the other Olds big blocks. I know I can dig up more on this, but quite frankly this is the first time I've ever heard it argued that they are as durable.
As for durability? There is no reason that this late 68-9 400 is not as strong as any other Nodular crank Olds V8. The forged crank 400-425 and rare 455 have a strength advantage for high HP builds but aside from that, anyone who claims a 400G isn't as durable as any nodular crank 455 is either a parrot of someone who is mis-informed or just sniffing glue.
#21
A little background before getting into my build, when I was 15 years old back in 1996 I have purchased my first olds, it was a saffron yellow 68' "S" with a 250 6cyl. After selling it after a year or so, I searched for 12 years looking for the perfect project car, needless to say I found it a few months back in downtown Atlanta.
This is a frame off restoration of my 68' Cutlass "S". It will follow a theme of a dream ordered 455 68' W-30 with all the goodies.
I bought it as a non-running mostly complete car. Hope you guys enjoy the pictures and the progress.
This is a frame off restoration of my 68' Cutlass "S". It will follow a theme of a dream ordered 455 68' W-30 with all the goodies.
I bought it as a non-running mostly complete car. Hope you guys enjoy the pictures and the progress.
#22
I know the only 68' cars that got 455's was hurst olds, and well mine or so thats the way i'm building it. I have a donor 70' 455 that i'll paint red with a TH400, not sure which heads are on the engine. It is a factory 4 barrel.
Last edited by RTTOY; March 29th, 2009 at 08:03 AM.
#25
#26
RTTOY , I see you have the same cheap engine hoist as I do , I took a 68 455 Toro engine out with tranny attached , and the whole thing almost tipped over...that is when I made training wheels for the engine hoist , utilizing the casters that were only used when hoist was in the fold up position.....will post pics on this and other blunders I made when I start a resto thread on my 72 CS when I get the time and money....etc....if anything else the thread should be fully entertaining in that aspect , so bring on the popcorn.
#27
It has been sitting in my garage stripped down, frame off for 3 years. I'll never get it finished....so assembled it goes. Found out it is a numbers matching car which is exciting. I'll be replacing parts that are worn out but bone stock it is the idea, i'll get it to running and driving and be a driver/restoration project which personally I enjoy better. Of course there are times where it'll be out of commision but I think its the way to go.
Frame back on the body, new lower ball joints and suspension bumpers everything else is good. De-grimed the front frame, A-arms, and steering box.
Frame back on the body, new lower ball joints and suspension bumpers everything else is good. De-grimed the front frame, A-arms, and steering box.
Last edited by RTTOY; September 14th, 2012 at 07:17 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post