i just couldn't let em crush it
#1
i just couldn't let em crush it
i went to a local junkyard to pull out some 84 camaro seats and put them in my 83 cutlass when i found this jem. i said nice car and he said "its for sale for $400 and if its still here in the morning, we are crushing it" i was lookin at the back and i thought it was a ford pinto. when i walked up closer i noticed it said mustang II on the back. primer black and red inside. it used to be a red car. it has a 2.8 v6 and the 4spd auto trans. it has atleast 1 rod hammering but i drove it 16 miles to my house. brand new starfire SX5000 tires all the way around, new battery, new altantor and ignition module. the pacer chrome rims are in good shape. just need to be cleaned up.
#2
Hey! A $400 car that drives on its own? What a score!
Now the Mustang 2 is just a different body on a Pinto chassis. But that in itself in not bad - they were good dependable little cars. Now the 2.8 does not have much potential, unlike the 2.3L L4. But again, it it drives, run it till it dies, then drop an Olds 350 in it......... It should have a 3 speed auto if it is stock.
Heck the price of the tires is worth what you paid for the car almost.
Great save.
Now the Mustang 2 is just a different body on a Pinto chassis. But that in itself in not bad - they were good dependable little cars. Now the 2.8 does not have much potential, unlike the 2.3L L4. But again, it it drives, run it till it dies, then drop an Olds 350 in it......... It should have a 3 speed auto if it is stock.
Heck the price of the tires is worth what you paid for the car almost.
Great save.
#5
heck, when the engine gives up you can put a 302 into it. the cobras and others were V8's so all the parts are around to do it cheap and easy. with a sbf in those they are fast and fun. for what you paid for it you can have lots of fun with it.
#6
good score! it's funny how cars that did nothing for me 20 years ago are becoming cooler.. i see a king cobra package on it with a stick and hopped up small turbo motor of your choice so she's not nose heavy.. a little giant slayer! i do not see many of the current cars on the road now being worth saving in 35 years-
#15
Agreed, but they were cute little cars to run around in, and, as was pointed out, could be stuffed with pretty darn big V8s for those who wanted more smiles per gallon.
Also, let's not forget exactly what it was like to actually ride in an early 'Stang - noisy, slow (most had the straight-6), rough, poor-handling, and poor build quality.
These '64 to '66 cars were purty, but, honestly, they had very little else going for them.
- Eric
Also, let's not forget exactly what it was like to actually ride in an early 'Stang - noisy, slow (most had the straight-6), rough, poor-handling, and poor build quality.
These '64 to '66 cars were purty, but, honestly, they had very little else going for them.
- Eric
#17
Agreed, but they were cute little cars to run around in, and, as was pointed out, could be stuffed with pretty darn big V8s for those who wanted more smiles per gallon.
Also, let's not forget exactly what it was like to actually ride in an early 'Stang - noisy, slow (most had the straight-6), rough, poor-handling, and poor build quality.
These '64 to '66 cars were purty, but, honestly, they had very little else going for them.
- Eric
Also, let's not forget exactly what it was like to actually ride in an early 'Stang - noisy, slow (most had the straight-6), rough, poor-handling, and poor build quality.
These '64 to '66 cars were purty, but, honestly, they had very little else going for them.
- Eric
#19
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kidcutty
Brakes/Hydraulic Systems
15
April 2nd, 2010 06:33 PM
nukesec1
Small Blocks
9
September 28th, 2009 05:16 AM
oldsdroptop
General Discussion
9
April 18th, 2009 07:06 PM