72 Cutlass - Hwy RPM???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 28, 2015 | 11:40 AM
  #1  
Maverick22's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 19
From: Saskatchewan, Canada
72 Cutlass - Hwy RPM???

I have a 72 cutlass with a 455, turbo hydra-matic 400 (M40) transmission, and 2.73 rear axel ration (no anti spin).

BFG Radial TA 225/70/14 **tire size added after original post**

At 60 mph i rev at 3400 rpm, 70 mph - 3600 rpm. This seems/feels/sounds high. Any thoughts?

The car is still getting back to street quality and i am wondering if something else isn't working that may cause this.

Thanks

Last edited by Maverick22; Apr 29, 2015 at 06:30 AM.
Old Apr 28, 2015 | 01:07 PM
  #2  
BeenThere's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 5,943
From: Latrobe, Pa.
You either have a 4:10 rear end or your tach is off. My money is on a bad tach reading.
Old Apr 28, 2015 | 01:13 PM
  #3  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 42,496
From: Poteau, Ok
X2 - tach not right
Old Apr 28, 2015 | 01:26 PM
  #4  
Fun71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15,409
From: Phoenix, AZ
x3 on the tach.

My car has 3.23 rear gears and when I had short 245-60-14 tires the engine turned ~3400 RPM @ 70-75 MPH.

You can calculate your engine RPM with an online calculator such as this one:

http://www.ringpinion.com/Calculators/Calc_RPM.aspx
Old Apr 28, 2015 | 01:36 PM
  #5  
Koda's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 12,798
From: Evansville, IN
I think you're stuck in second, dude.
Old Apr 28, 2015 | 05:20 PM
  #6  
ziff396's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,015
From: Near Muskegon Michigan
Originally Posted by Koda
I think you're stuck in second, dude.
That sounds possible with 2.73's. My 3.42 with 275/60/15's ( 27.5 tall not 28 as claimed) only run around 3k or so.
Old Apr 28, 2015 | 05:59 PM
  #7  
Fun71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15,409
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by Koda
I think you're stuck in second, dude.
You may be onto something here. I ran my RPM calculator with 2.73 rear gears, 1.48 trans ratio (TH400 second gear ratio), guessed at 25" tall tires, and got 3258 RPM @ 60 MPH and 3801 RPM @ 70 MPH.

Well, now that I look at it, the calculated RPM @ 70 MPH is higher than what he's seeing. I'm back to thinking tach issue.
Old Apr 28, 2015 | 08:09 PM
  #8  
Koda's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 12,798
From: Evansville, IN
Ok, simple solution is to drop it from D to 2 and see what happens.
Old Apr 28, 2015 | 10:34 PM
  #9  
Fun71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15,409
From: Phoenix, AZ
Yep, that is a good idea.
Old Apr 29, 2015 | 03:09 AM
  #10  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Why not just check your tire diameter and do the math?

Asking us, without even telling us your tire diameter, is a fairly pointless exercise, while doing some simple arithmetic will give you the answer in about a minute.

- Eric
Old Apr 29, 2015 | 06:26 AM
  #11  
Maverick22's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 19
From: Saskatchewan, Canada
Confirmed i am not in second gear (counted shifts) and used dual gate 3rd and dropped down.

This morning drove with a gps and tach says 3150 at 60 and 3600 at 70.

Sorry never even though about tire size, been away from this for too long.

BFG Radial T/A - 225/70/14

Just used the online calculator (suggested above) and it said should be 2141 rpm. Another site 2081 rpm.

Based on this, it looks like bad tach, however it does sound like it is reving very high.

Last edited by Maverick22; Apr 29, 2015 at 06:29 AM.
Old Apr 29, 2015 | 06:56 AM
  #12  
hookem horns's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 877
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by Maverick22
Based on this, it looks like bad tach, however it does sound like it is reving very high.
Thanks for the clarifications and I agree you can usually tell 3300rpm from 2300rpm by ear. If the tach is close, seems like you have 2 possibilities:
1. Significant slippage in the transmission or torque converter, but this is usually more noticeable pulling away from a stop than at cruising speed. Check for low or burnt trans fluid.
2. Someone swapped the rear end before you got it. Do a quick search on how to check the real ratio. You jack up the back end and count drive shaft revolutions as your turn the rear wheels.
Old Apr 29, 2015 | 07:09 AM
  #13  
Maverick22's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 19
From: Saskatchewan, Canada
1) I haven't changed the transmission fluid yet, but level is good.
2) I changed the diferential fluid and confirmed the gear ration by counting teeth.

I don't trust my knowledge of transmissions, so i will take to a shop for that maintenance.
Old Apr 29, 2015 | 07:24 AM
  #14  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
I just did the math on this.

Your 255/70R14 tire should have a diameter of 28.06", which gives a circumference of 88.15", which gives 718.76 rotations per mile (and 718.76 RPM at 60mph).

A 2.73:1 rear in a 1:1 top gear should give 1,962 engine RPMs (let's say 2,000 RPM with converter slippage) at 60mph.

You would need a 4.38:1 rear end to give you 3,150 RPM at 60mph in top gear.

I'd get a new tach and then go from there.

- Eric
Old Apr 29, 2015 | 07:49 AM
  #15  
oldsmobiledave's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 3,688
From: Delta BC Canada
wrong size

Originally Posted by MDchanic
I just did the math on this.

Your 255/70R14 tire should have a diameter of 28.06", which gives a circumference of 88.15", which gives 718.76 rotations per mile (and 718.76 RPM at 60mph).

A 2.73:1 rear in a 1:1 top gear should give 1,962 engine RPMs (let's say 2,000 RPM with converter slippage) at 60mph.

You would need a 4.38:1 rear end to give you 3,150 RPM at 60mph in top gear.

I'd get a new tach and then go from there.

- Eric

He has a 225 70 14 not 255 70 14. No one makes a tire in that size.


225 70 14 is 26.4" tall not the 28.1" that you used for your calculation

Last edited by oldsmobiledave; Apr 29, 2015 at 07:56 AM.
Old Apr 29, 2015 | 07:58 AM
  #16  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by oldsmobiledave
He has a 225 70 14 not 255 70 14.
Guess I'm dyslexic.

Circumference is 82.94", with 863.45 revolutions per mile, and 2,357 RPM at 60mph.

3,150 RPM at 60mph would require a 3.65:1 rear end ratio.

- Eric
Old Apr 29, 2015 | 08:24 PM
  #17  
Koda's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 12,798
From: Evansville, IN
Recommend cheapie autozone tach hooked up to engine bay and compare it to your tach at 1k, 2k, and 3k out of gear.
Old Apr 29, 2015 | 10:09 PM
  #18  
Fun71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15,409
From: Phoenix, AZ
So what tach do you have in the car? Many years ago my Sun Super Tach II started reading erroneously (like that word?) and I discovered the 4-6-8 switch had a loose connection. Simple solder job to make a permanent 8 connection as this tach will never be used on a 4 or 6 engine and all has been well for many years now.

Last edited by Fun71; Apr 29, 2015 at 10:11 PM.
Old Apr 30, 2015 | 09:14 AM
  #19  
Maverick22's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 19
From: Saskatchewan, Canada
Originally Posted by Fun71
So what tach do you have in the car? Many years ago my Sun Super Tach II started reading erroneously (like that word?) and I discovered the 4-6-8 switch had a loose connection. Simple solder job to make a permanent 8 connection as this tach will never be used on a 4 or 6 engine and all has been well for many years now.
Factory olds tic toc tach

I will get a tach and hook it up and compare.
Old May 7, 2015 | 07:44 AM
  #20  
oldsmobiledave's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 3,688
From: Delta BC Canada
Curious

So what did you discover when you installed another tach?
Old May 7, 2015 | 08:49 AM
  #21  
GINCSC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 171
I'm curious as well of the outcome. I have the same problem but put the issue on hold to get it painted. I'll be working on it in the next couple of weeks.
Old May 7, 2015 | 10:34 AM
  #22  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,802
From: Northern VA
Look, this is simple math. With a transmission that has a 1:1 top gear, the RPM at a certain speed is controlled by three things:

1) diameter of the tire (or, more accurately, the revolutions per mile of the tire since the tire deflects under load, changing the radius)
2) the rear axle ratio
3) the amount of slippage in the torque converter.

If you do the math (as shown above) and the calculated RPMs are wildly different from what you are seeing, there are only three possible causes:

1) the tach is wrong
2) the rear axle ratio is not what you think
3) there is a problem in the trans (excessive slippage or it's not in high gear).

That's it, there are no other options. Of course, you can always use the "count the turns" method to find out exactly what rear axle ratio you have.
Old May 11, 2015 | 12:03 PM
  #23  
Maverick22's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 19
From: Saskatchewan, Canada
Unfortunately i have been away for work longer than expected and have not yet purchased a tach. I am back for a few days and hope to get that tested.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Alex72cutty
Parts Wanted
2
Dec 25, 2014 06:58 PM
skubydobdo
Transmission
12
Feb 3, 2014 03:25 PM
rick_roach
Parts For Sale
1
Nov 3, 2008 03:57 PM
W30post
Big Blocks
6
Nov 30, 2007 02:46 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:03 AM.