'70 442 - Auto Trans Crossmember Insulators or not ??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 9, 2016 | 07:14 PM
  #1  
35olds's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 420
'70 442 - Auto Trans Crossmember Insulators or not ??

I have a '70 442 W30 Auto and recently stripped down the chassis to restore it. The cross member for the auto trans was bolted directly to the side chassis rails (with no insulators).
I've since seen rubber insulators & brackets lists on various parts suppliers sites like The Parts Place (see photo attached), OPGI and others but I can't see anywhere in the Olds Parts Books or Assembly Manual that shows these.
Can anyone verify for me that these were actually original equipment (a photo would be fantastic).
Thanks so much.
Attached Images
Old Oct 9, 2016 | 07:17 PM
  #2  
svnt442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,293
From: Palm Bay, FL
I have never seen any type in insulator on any of the cars I have worked on over the years. That's not to say they weren't there from the factory, but I have never seen them and I have had my hands on quite a few since I was 15 (46 now).

My guess would be that they were not used (at least on the 68 and up cars), but that is just an "educated guess" on my part.
Old Oct 9, 2016 | 08:57 PM
  #3  
35olds's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 420
Originally Posted by svnt442
I have never seen any type in insulator on any of the cars I have worked on over the years. That's not to say they weren't there from the factory, but I have never seen them and I have had my hands on quite a few since I was 15 (46 now).

My guess would be that they were not used (at least on the 68 and up cars), but that is just an "educated guess" on my part.
Thanks Randy. Thats what I'd suspected, particularly when they weren't shown in the parts book.
Cheers
Rohan
Old Oct 10, 2016 | 05:46 AM
  #4  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 42,453
From: Poteau, Ok
None of the A body cars I have worked on have had these insulators installed. All xmembers were bolted directly to the frame. Not sure of the convertibles as I have never worked on one.
Old Oct 10, 2016 | 06:28 AM
  #5  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,724
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by oldcutlass
None of the A body cars I have worked on have had these insulators installed. All xmembers were bolted directly to the frame. Not sure of the convertibles as I have never worked on one.
A-body Oldsmobiles never used isolators. Other brands did. Yet another case of a mis-informed vendor trying to make more money off of parts that aren't correct for an Olds. Kind of like the repro plastic cowl screens for Chevelles that everyone claims fit an Olds.
Old Oct 10, 2016 | 01:18 PM
  #6  
35olds's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 420
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
A-body Oldsmobiles never used isolators. Other brands did. Yet another case of a mis-informed vendor trying to make more money off of parts that aren't correct for an Olds. Kind of like the repro plastic cowl screens for Chevelles that everyone claims fit an Olds.
Thanks Joe,
I thought that was probably the case when the parts book didn't show them.
Cheers
Rohan
Old Nov 1, 2016 | 06:48 PM
  #7  
70sgeek's Avatar
'72 Cutlass ragtop
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 1,295
From: Tampa, FL
Just curious - what would be the harm in using them? I have a new repro pair left over from my prior '72 Skylark that I was planning to install on my '72 CS ragtop when the drivetrain goes back in.
Old Nov 1, 2016 | 06:57 PM
  #8  
svnt442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,293
From: Palm Bay, FL
If they weren't used from the factory, why would you add them?
Old Nov 1, 2016 | 08:18 PM
  #9  
70sgeek's Avatar
'72 Cutlass ragtop
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 1,295
From: Tampa, FL
Presumably for the same reason they were used in other A-bodies - to provide a little more road shock insulation for the crossmember. Unless they somehow change the crossmember/transmission mounting geometry in manner not shared with the other A-frames, I wouldn't see any downside for normal driving use.
Old Nov 1, 2016 | 08:22 PM
  #10  
66luvr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 881
From: Ironton Ohio 45638
FWIW, These were used on Buicks, and the rubber pieces are still available from GM, part number1385001. Do not know what years Buick used them but they were on a 67 Skylark I owned.
Old Nov 1, 2016 | 08:30 PM
  #11  
svnt442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,293
From: Palm Bay, FL
For me it's just another point of failure. They were not installed from the factory and to my mind they are not necessary. You can do what you like of course, it's your car.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
442dale
Cutlass
0
Apr 15, 2013 04:51 PM
KZ442
Parts Wanted
0
Mar 26, 2011 06:36 AM
Big Blue 72
Suspension & Handling
11
Mar 11, 2009 12:20 AM
esisson
General Discussion
2
Dec 8, 2008 06:18 PM
Bill
Chassis/Body/Frame
0
Feb 11, 2004 04:29 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:28 AM.