Overdrive questions...TH200/700R4...

Old Jul 28, 2010 | 03:05 PM
  #1  
STLCRZY's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 296
From: Germany
Overdrive questions...TH200/700R4...

Hi everybody,

i send a few question from Germany about the above-named overdrive Transmissions because my driveshaft was broken @4500rpm and destroy the case of the TH400,the floor pan,exhaust and and and.....$$$!

Now,iīm maybe plan to swap to a overdrive but not sure if itīs a big deal?

# everyone swap a TH200 or 700R4 in a 64-67 A-body?

# can i use the existing transmission cross member if i use the TH200R4,which parts i need ?

#i read about swap the Planet Gears from a TH400 to become the nearly the same effect?

The car is a 65 442 with 3,42 Gears and mild 455 so donīt want to race this car.


will be very happy about any information!

Best regards
Denis

ps.sorry for my English!
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 05:44 PM
  #2  
svnt442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,293
From: Palm Bay, FL
The 200 4R is the way to go. You just need to have it build to handle the torque of the 455. If you check out this posting at turbobuick.com it will shed some light on what should be done to make it bullit proof. http://www.turbobuick.com/forums/tra...ing-2004r.html
Old Jul 29, 2010 | 03:53 AM
  #3  
STLCRZY's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 296
From: Germany
Thanks for the quick reply......and the site.
Why not the TH700,maybe easier to become here in Germ.


Not see the Transmission section in this forum,sorry.
Old Jul 29, 2010 | 04:57 AM
  #4  
Oldsguy's Avatar
Past Administrator
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 10,359
From: Rural Waxahachie Texas
Moved thread to transmission forum...
Old Jul 29, 2010 | 08:40 AM
  #5  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,791
From: Northern VA
The 200-4R vs. 700R4 discussion comes up frequently on all automotive boards. Personally I prefer the 200-4R for the following reasons:

1. The 200-4R bolts to the Olds motor. The 700R4 requires an adapter plate.
2. The 200-4R has what most consider to be a better gear ratio split. The 700R4 has a lower first gear but then a cavernous drop between first and second.
3. The 200-4R is the same length as the TH400. The 700R4 is an oddball length. This is less of a problem for you, since you need a driveshaft anyway, but you can use a stock TH400 length driveshaft with the 200-4R. The 700R4 requires a custom shaft.
4. The 200-4R puts the crossmember in the same place as for the Jetaway or TH350. Those holes are already drilled in your frame rails. The 700R4 requires a unique crossmember location and new holes to be drilled.

Both transmissions require the small front yoke. The TH400 yoke won't work.

Both transmissions require beefing up to live behind an Olds motor. Parts are available for either. Neither will live long in stock form.

Both transmissions require routing a throttle valve cable and sourcing a bracket for the cable at the carb.

The 200-4R is very sensitive to heat, so an aux transmission cooler is a good idea.
Old Jul 29, 2010 | 08:43 AM
  #6  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,791
From: Northern VA
One more point. I just noticed that you have a convertible. The crossmember bolts to tabs welded to the inside of the frame rails. Since you had a TH400 in a 65, you've apparently already modified these tabs. The 200-4R should allow the crossmember to bolt to the original location, if that wasn't cut off when the TH400 tabs were installed. The 700R4 requires new tabs to be welded on in either case.
Old Jul 30, 2010 | 01:35 PM
  #7  
STLCRZY's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 296
From: Germany
Thanks Joe for you informative reply.....

do you know a good and cheap source,maybe i private person who ship to Germany....... i found this shop:

http://www.bowtieoverdrives.com/cata....php?ITEMID=11

but not sure if it will withstand the nearly stock 455/300HP

Regards
Denis
Old Jul 30, 2010 | 05:31 PM
  #8  
68conv455's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 634
Good and cheap don't often fit together. I researched 2004R's for two years before I decided to buy from CK performance. I went with the full billet and my 455 hasn't broken it. My rear tires do feel the pain though.
Old Jul 31, 2010 | 07:12 AM
  #9  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,791
From: Northern VA
I will second the endorsement of CK Performance. I've used them for 200-4R parts in the past. Very knowledgeable. Chris builds these transmissions to live behind 9 sec turbo Buicks.
Old Jul 31, 2010 | 07:33 AM
  #10  
STLCRZY's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 296
From: Germany
Joe,can you write this :
The crossmember bolts to tabs welded to the inside of the frame rails. Since you had a TH400 in a 65, you've apparently already modified these tabs. The 200-4R should allow the crossmember to bolt to the original location, if that wasn't cut off when the TH400 tabs were installed

in other words please......because i donīt install the Th400 so i not sure what are "these tabs".

Maybe a pic will help.

regards
Denis
Old Jul 31, 2010 | 07:43 AM
  #11  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,791
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by STLCRZY
Joe,can you write this :
The crossmember bolts to tabs welded to the inside of the frame rails. Since you had a TH400 in a 65, you've apparently already modified these tabs. The 200-4R should allow the crossmember to bolt to the original location, if that wasn't cut off when the TH400 tabs were installed

in other words please......because i donīt install the Th400 so i not sure what are "these tabs".

Maybe a pic will help.

regards
Denis
Denis,

On hardtops, the frame rails are simple "C" sections. The crossmember sits on the lower flange of the frame rail. In that case it's very easy to relocate the crossmember and drill new holes to bolt it in place.

Convertibles need extra frame stiffness to make up for not having a metal roof. The convertible frame is a full box section, which does not allow the crossmember to mount in the same way as on hardtops. Instead a separate tab is welded to the inside of the frame rail for the trans crossmember to bolt to. On the 1965 cars, the only available transmissions were the manual trans or the ST300, which are the same length, so these tabs are only designed to mount the crossmember in one location. The TH400 is longer and requires the crossmember to be mounted further back. On the convertibles the tabs don't go back that far, so someone must have welded additional metal in place to allow the crossmember to mount.

Just crawl under the car and look at where the crossmember bolts to the frame rails, and this will become obvious.
Old Jul 31, 2010 | 07:52 AM
  #12  
STLCRZY's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 296
From: Germany
Maybe this helps a little......
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
PICT1175.jpg (54.3 KB, 58 views)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
geckonz08
Big Blocks
11
Sep 3, 2009 09:00 PM
cruisin442
Transmission
0
Apr 1, 2007 09:08 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:24 AM.