69 442 with T-10 Trans

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 6, 2009 | 07:08 PM
  #1  
derek nesdoly's Avatar
Thread Starter
olds..older..oldest
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 364
From: Ontario, Canada
69 442 with T-10 Trans

Just got a 69 442 all numbers match except the trans. Second last owner changed it to the T-10. Question: will it have any trouble with the torque of my 400 being driven hard?Suggestions/merits of alternatives eg. Saginaw,Muncie as I don't want to learn the hard[expensive]way. Thanks,derek
Old Apr 6, 2009 | 08:08 PM
  #2  
MN71W30's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,173
From: Somerset Wisconsin
It's a T10 and not a Super T10? We have used ST10's with cars that ran in the 11's and they held up pretty well. We blew up a Richmond 2.88 first gear tranny last summer with some merciless 5500 rpm drop the clutch hole shots. The 2.88 is known to be weaker. Your 69 in stock form should run well into the lower 14's which probably eliminates the Saganaw and T10 holding up under severe hole shot launches with drag tires. A good old Muncie M20 with a 1" pin should hold up just fine. It seems your options are either run your t10 and keep your fingers crossed and have a little mercy at the track or pull it out and sell it and find a Muncie.
Dave

Last edited by MN71W30; Apr 6, 2009 at 08:10 PM.
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 04:23 AM
  #3  
derek nesdoly's Avatar
Thread Starter
olds..older..oldest
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 364
From: Ontario, Canada
Thanks Dave for that info. Guess you're into the drag race scene.I'm not going to race per se,just want to leave my next door neighbour behind in his 1970 396 SS Chevelle! How can you tell WHICH T-10 model you have? Tried to go to the Borg Warner website with the #'s cast on the tran, but no luck. derek
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 05:47 AM
  #4  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
Too big to post, but if you give me your e-mail, I'll send you a trans ID .pdf document
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 08:40 AM
  #5  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,770
From: Northern VA
Saginaw transmissions were only used behind the six cylinder and small V8 engines. The Muncie was the factory trans for the 442. The Super T10 should be fine for most BBO applications.
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 06:28 PM
  #6  
derek nesdoly's Avatar
Thread Starter
olds..older..oldest
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 364
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by wmachine
Too big to post, but if you give me your e-mail, I'll send you a trans ID .pdf document
Ill take you up on that offer....email is nesdoly@rogers.com further question:it has a non-posi rear end and would like to be educated as to the pros and cons of ? changing .....Thanks, derek
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 06:50 PM
  #7  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by derek nesdoly
Ill take you up on that offer....email is nesdoly@rogers.com further question:it has a non-posi rear end and would like to be educated as to the pros and cons of ? changing .....Thanks, derek
E-mail sent!
Old Apr 9, 2009 | 06:01 PM
  #8  
derek nesdoly's Avatar
Thread Starter
olds..older..oldest
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 364
From: Ontario, Canada
W Machine, that was a great site you directed me to! Next question:The exchange , duty and shipping kills us Canucks, so does anyone know of a Canadian Muncie source? Buffalo is only 2 1/2 hours away if there's a shop in that locale[ could drive down and smuggle it back...so much for "free"trade!] derek
Old Apr 11, 2009 | 03:02 PM
  #9  
derek nesdoly's Avatar
Thread Starter
olds..older..oldest
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 364
From: Ontario, Canada
ST-10 swap and new rear end

Found a Canadian Muncie shop....only 3,500 miles away! Want to drive my 442 this summer eg. up to the cottage,but also want some low end action. Found out the rear has a 2.56 in it[see my dilemma in 442 forum] and wonder if a 3.23 or 3.42 setup would work,independent of a change to M-20 or not. Not running 1/4 miles, so you slick-shods keep that in mind with your suggestions ! Thanks,derek
Old Apr 11, 2009 | 06:42 PM
  #10  
2blu442's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,272
From: Medford, Oregon
All around driving I like the 3.23 or 3.42 and think you'd be happy with either one. 3.91 would be a kick, but running down the freeway winds the engine up higher than I care to for an extended period. I had a 4 speed with a 3.08 once and I think it was too tall. My 2 cents. John
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flye
Parts Wanted
3
Apr 18, 2011 04:24 PM
1970_442
Transmission
17
Oct 21, 2010 01:10 PM
WTony
Parts For Sale
4
Jul 3, 2010 10:50 AM
64Super88
Transmission
1
May 15, 2010 07:24 AM
ctrain22
442
5
Mar 9, 2009 06:11 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:45 AM.