Holley vs Edelbrock

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 5, 2010 | 06:53 PM
  #1  
rkk69olds's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 172
From: Melbourne, FL
Holley vs Edelbrock

Okay I know this topic has probably been discussed to death, but here's my experience with the 2. I put a 670 street avenger on my 350 and it did not like it. It was a brand new build and brand new carb

355
10:3.1 advertised compression pistions
Nodular crank
#5 heads with SS valves, HP springs and roller tip rockers
Edelbrock performer RPM cam, lifters and intake
Mallory unilite with MSD wires and autolite 85's
Flowtech ceramic coated headers
RobbMC fuel pump
TH350 with 2500 stall
3:42 gears

With the 670 it stumbled from idle, ran rich and overall did not perform well. Out of the box with nothing changed. Now I admit I am no Holley master so I probably did not tune it right. I tried different pump cams, adjusted accelerator pump, tried various discharge nozzles and jets with not resolve. I read all the articles and tried all the tricks with no success

I decided to put on a new 650 Edelbrock AVS and out of the box it works great. No stumble, idle is better, running cooler and not rich.

Could it be that the AVS is closer in design to the Q-jet which I hear is a great carb for a SBO?

Thanks
Old Nov 5, 2010 | 11:27 PM
  #2  
71 Cutlass's Avatar
One of None W-31
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 671
From: Texas
My experience exactly. Edelbrock is the best carb I've ever used.
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 04:21 AM
  #3  
Redog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,145
From: Far Northeast Philadelphia, PA
I've heard Holleys are better.

Now I'm confused
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 08:27 AM
  #4  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,791
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Redog
I've heard Holleys are better.
Well, they are definitely better than no carb at all...
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 11:47 AM
  #5  
citcapp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,127
From: Rathdrum, Idano
You'll find as many opinions on this subject as you would on any political issue. I prefer Holly carbs. I have run then on everything I own for over 40 years. I find them easy to tune and very responsive. I will admit they do not get the gas mileage of other carbs (according to people I know when we have done comparisons) but then again I don't build my engines for mileage. What ever floats you boat I say
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 11:49 AM
  #6  
cutlassefi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,483
From: Central Fl
Never had any luck with Edelbrocks, had 3 over the years, sent them all back or sold them. Jmo.

There's something wrong with your Holley. I did a 436 BBC last year with an out of box 770 Avenger. Worked perfectly, didn't have to touch it. Did a 362 SBO with a 670, same thing, ran great untouched.
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 12:14 PM
  #7  
firefrost gold's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,444
From: mn
best carb i have had was a 650 double pumper with mechanical secondaries but i have had and find the performer edelbrock easy to dial in my q jet is still too new to praise yet.
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 04:56 PM
  #8  
ziff396's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,015
From: Near Muskegon Michigan
Originally Posted by firefrost gold
best carb i have had was a 650 double pumper with mechanical secondaries but i have had and find the performer edelbrock easy to dial in my q jet is still too new to praise yet.
First I tried the edelbrock 750 performer. Okay, but the engine seemed to want more.
Next, I put on the 870 holley street avenger. Ran like hell, but I could not tune the rich idle out of it.
Now, I have a custom built 800 cfm quadrajet off a 403 built by Mountain Man carbs to my engine, convertor, trans, and rear end gears. Runs perfect. No rich idle, and actually goes better than the holley. JMO
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 07:39 PM
  #9  
cutlassefi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,483
From: Central Fl
Originally Posted by ziff396
First I tried the edelbrock 750 performer. Okay, but the engine seemed to want more.
Next, I put on the 870 holley street avenger. Ran like hell, but I could not tune the rich idle out of it. Wrong power valve maybe? That'll do it.
Now, I have a custom built 800 cfm quadrajet off a 403 built by Mountain Man carbs to my engine, convertor, trans, and rear end gears. Runs perfect. No rich idle, and actually goes better than the holley. JMO
Old Nov 7, 2010 | 05:06 PM
  #10  
ziff396's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,015
From: Near Muskegon Michigan
Power valve checked out right. There is alot of the same rich idle posts with these on other boards with no real answer. Well at least a year ago. Anyways, I have had the quadrajet on for about a year now and still am very happy with it.
Old Nov 7, 2010 | 07:41 PM
  #11  
Olds92's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 161
From: Wisconsin
Edelbrock is better for street. Holley is better for drag.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OldsManNJ
Small Blocks
11
May 23, 2012 08:20 AM
jag1886
Small Blocks
0
Feb 14, 2011 04:41 PM
Daverd
Parts Wanted
0
Feb 11, 2011 08:31 PM
thatguy32567
Small Blocks
22
Jun 1, 2009 06:59 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:54 AM.