Timing question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 26, 2012 | 08:30 AM
  #1  
84oldsDelta88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 262
From: South Jersey
Timing question

So i finally bought a timing light with advance feature today. When i was checking timing i noticed that my engine idles at 30 degrees initial. (vac advance disconnected) and if i take it down to 20 it runs like a slug. at 3000rpm its showing roughly 40-46 degrees total(mechanical/inital). Maybe its just me but that seems a bit high even for my 70' 350. something seem wrong here?
Old Aug 26, 2012 | 08:44 AM
  #2  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by 84oldsDelta88
something seem wrong here?
Yes, it's too far advanced.

You need to check to be sure your timing mark hasn't moved, and if it hasn't you may have a different problem, such as a timing chain that's skipped a tooth.

You did connect the light to the #1 cylinder, right?

- Eric
Old Aug 26, 2012 | 08:50 AM
  #3  
Tony72Cutlass'S''s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,175
From: Montreal, QC
As Eric said, simply verify the timing mark on your balancer by putting the #1 cylinder at TDC on the compression stroke and check where your balancer is.

i have a 72' 350 and my timing on the timing light is set to 10 degrees BTDC (vacuum can disconnected of course)
Old Aug 26, 2012 | 02:54 PM
  #4  
84oldsDelta88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 262
From: South Jersey
Yup timing light was on number 1. And chain should be good as timing set was replaced when i did my motor swap. Could it be that the advance feature on my timing light is off a couple degrees?
Old Aug 26, 2012 | 02:59 PM
  #5  
captjim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Originally Posted by Tony72Cutlass'S'
As Eric said, simply verify the timing mark on your balancer by putting the #1 cylinder at TDC on the compression stroke and check where your balancer is.

i have a 72' 350 and my timing on the timing light is set to 10 degrees BTDC (vacuum can disconnected of course)

That is not accurate enough. We are talking 10-20 degrees here, not a lot. The wrong pointer or a spun balancer (seen that several times) can cause this. The only way to be cetain is to verify TDC using the cam degree method and checking it against the mark/pointer.

Last edited by captjim; Aug 29, 2012 at 04:15 AM.
Old Aug 28, 2012 | 10:33 AM
  #6  
84oldsDelta88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 262
From: South Jersey
Okay so i just checked the timing again. It guessing its running 22-24 inital, with 10 mechanical and 24 vacuum advance, Kind of hard to tell to be honest as i cant see the numbers on the timing mark and dont know where 0 is when i dial in the advance.

Does anyone have a picture of a olds points timing mark? so i can figure out where 0 is and dial in the timing properly.
(when i installed the hei dist. i forgot to install a hei timing mark, in case your wondering why im asking for a points timing mark when i'm running hei)

I notice i get pinging in the higher rpms. So i might need to recurve the distributor,
Old Aug 28, 2012 | 11:01 AM
  #7  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 42,386
From: Poteau, Ok
The timing mark is the same for points or HEI, "0" is zero. "0" is generally the second mark from the right facing the engine. With vacuum disconnected, if you shine the light on the balancer and turn the adustment on the light to get the line on the balancer to line up with 0 on the timing tab, that will tell you what your engine is timed at.
Old Aug 28, 2012 | 12:00 PM
  #8  
84oldsDelta88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 262
From: South Jersey
Ok just checked again. and to get the timing to line up with 0 i have to turn the advance on my timing light to roughly 24. It starts easy and runs the best at this setting. If I back the timing down 4 degrees off idle acceleration and general performance suffer. I'm starting to think the timing mark on the balancer might have moved, will have to check that 1 of these days.

But in the meantime I'm gonna go to napa and order 1 of their gm hei recurve kits its only 9 bucks comes with 3 springs and a couple other things. So i can change up the timing curve for better performance.
Old Aug 28, 2012 | 02:03 PM
  #9  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 42,386
From: Poteau, Ok
You need to find out where your timing mark is at tdc with the rotor pointing to #1.
Old Aug 28, 2012 | 02:22 PM
  #10  
captjim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Originally Posted by oldcutlass
You need to find out where your timing mark is at tdc with the rotor pointing to #1.
Obviously, it is close or it would not run. Eye-balling it is not going to cut it. He needs to go through the procedure used to degree a cam and find TRUE TDC, then see if that matches up with the pointer and slot in the balancer.
You could always do the old-school "power timing" method, though it is not fool proof by any means. Check the timing, drive it. If no "ping", add 2 degrees, if "ping", retard 2 degrees. Keep doing that until you find where it will not ping under load. As long as it starts and runs OK, and does not overheat, drive it.
Old Aug 28, 2012 | 02:26 PM
  #11  
captjim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Originally Posted by 84oldsDelta88
But in the meantime I'm gonna go to napa and order 1 of their gm hei recurve kits its only 9 bucks comes with 3 springs and a couple other things. So i can change up the timing curve for better performance.
Honestly, you might be better off just leaving it as-is. If you re-curve, you may have too much vac advance which would require a new adjustable canister. If you do go with the kit, keep the stock weights and use the springs only.

Here is my 350 SBO "recipe". The recurve kits come with 3 springs, light, medium, and heavy. Using the stock weights, use 1 light and 1 medium spring, set initial at 23 degrees, and add 12 degrees of vacuum advance. This has worked very well for me on multiple cars (in Florida).

Last edited by captjim; Aug 29, 2012 at 04:16 AM.
Old Aug 28, 2012 | 02:30 PM
  #12  
Tony72Cutlass'S''s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,175
From: Montreal, QC
Originally Posted by captjim
That is not accurate enough. We are talking 10-20 degrees here, not a lot. The wrong pointer or a spun balancer (seen that several times) can cause this. The only way to be cetain is to veriry TDC using the cam gegree method and chacking it against the marl/pointer.
Right, but it's a good preliminary check.

Although, you can easily pull off the valve cover with a dial gauge to rock and roll some measurments.
Old Aug 28, 2012 | 02:37 PM
  #13  
don71's Avatar
same but different
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,952
From: Central Missouri
Here is pic of two dampners. Hopefully you can notice the "chisel"marks. I'm not sure if these will look like yours, since they are from different years. Another pic of one that has obviously spun.

You will have to clean it up well and look carefully for the marks.




Old Aug 28, 2012 | 03:01 PM
  #14  
captjim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Originally Posted by Tony72Cutlass'S'
Right, but it's a good preliminary check.

Although, you can easily pull off the valve cover with a dial gauge to rock and roll some measurments.
OK, here I go again "arguing" when guys make erroneous statements.

It is NOT a good preliminary check. If it was off more than the eye could see, it would not run.

How will putting a dial gauge on the rockers determine when the piston is at TDC?
Old Aug 28, 2012 | 05:05 PM
  #15  
shatrab's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 132
From: Perkasie, PA
Ok, I'm half hijacking this post... I've noticed from the last few comments (and pictures too) that you can have a "spun" balancer? This may be my issue... I cannot check timing off a light as the timing mark is nowhere near where it should be. I will now have to check the balancer to hub marks (as indicated in the pics) to see if this is my problem! Thanks guys! Glad I followed this string of posts!
Old Aug 28, 2012 | 05:36 PM
  #16  
captjim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Here you go guys,
It is not rocket science. You can purchase a piston stop instead of making one.
http://www.summitracing.com/search/P...on-Stop-Tools/
Old Aug 28, 2012 | 06:59 PM
  #17  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by shatrab
I will now have to check the balancer to hub marks (as indicated in the pics) to see if this is my problem!
Not all balancers have witness marks to confirm that they haven't spun.
I believe that they were added in the early '70s, though I am not certain.

You may need to find true TDC just to be sure.

Originally Posted by captjim
You can purchase a piston stop instead of making one.
Wow. You learn something every day.

I always thought you had to tap out an old spark plug if you wanted one of those.


- Eric
Old Aug 28, 2012 | 07:22 PM
  #18  
shatrab's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 132
From: Perkasie, PA
Even though this was someone else's post, I appreciate the video (Captain Jim), and the follow up (Eric), that my 68 may not have alignment marks to see if the balancer has spun. Makes easy enough sense using a piston stop, and remarking the balancer! Thanks again!
Shawn
Old Aug 28, 2012 | 07:32 PM
  #19  
Tony72Cutlass'S''s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,175
From: Montreal, QC
Originally Posted by captjim
OK, here I go again "arguing" when guys make erroneous statements.

It is NOT a good preliminary check. If it was off more than the eye could see, it would not run.

How will putting a dial gauge on the rockers determine when the piston is at TDC?
It's not an erronius statement if you've read the cutlass service manual.

Page. 6B-31

CHECKING VALVE TIMING WITHOUT REMOVING FRONT COVER

Attached Images
File Type: jpg
valve timing.jpg (77.6 KB, 103 views)
Old Aug 28, 2012 | 07:33 PM
  #20  
Tony72Cutlass'S''s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,175
From: Montreal, QC
I used this exact procedure and figured out my timing chain skipped a tooth.
Old Aug 28, 2012 | 07:37 PM
  #21  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Tony, this will show you roughy whether the valves are timed correctly with the crankshaft, but will not tell you whether the damper timing mark is accurate (notice that the mark isn't used in this procedure).

A "close" eyeball of the piston position (say, with a pencil sticking out of the spark plug hole) will get you within 5 or 10°, but to be really accurate, you have to use the bolt-in-spark plug trick, or a dial indicator.

- Eric
Old Aug 28, 2012 | 07:59 PM
  #22  
Tony72Cutlass'S''s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,175
From: Montreal, QC
Originally Posted by MDchanic
Tony, this will show you roughy whether the valves are timed correctly with the crankshaft, but will not tell you whether the damper timing mark is accurate (notice that the mark isn't used in this procedure).

A "close" eyeball of the piston position (say, with a pencil sticking out of the spark plug hole) will get you within 5 or 10°, but to be really accurate, you have to use the bolt-in-spark plug trick, or a dial indicator.

- Eric
Well i tried! Maybe that'll work for others that had the same issue as me. (chain skipping thing)

I was trying to think of the most number of ways of verifying time without pulling the balancer. Which, is probably easier at this point and then you'll know for sure.

Eric, last i remember the keyway on the balancer points to TDC on #1 compression stroke? I have a picture of this somewhere...
Old Aug 29, 2012 | 03:28 AM
  #23  
captjim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Originally Posted by Tony72Cutlass'S'
It's not an erronius statement if you've read the cutlass service manual.

Page. 6B-31

CHECKING VALVE TIMING WITHOUT REMOVING FRONT COVER

This is exactly how I get my well-earned reputation as an "arguer". You are incorrect, valve timing is separate from the piston location. This procedure will not help you find true TDC of the piston or determine if the balancer has slipped. So, I point this out and you respond will an elaborate post defending your initial, but incorrect, position. Now I have to come back and say the same thing over again. Theoretically, you could maybe do this and work backwards, but there are so many variables, all it will do is get you close.

Last edited by captjim; Aug 29, 2012 at 04:19 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jpc647
Small Blocks
7
Jun 10, 2013 11:48 AM
442scotty
General Discussion
8
May 13, 2009 05:42 PM
54olds
Small Blocks
3
Jun 7, 2008 08:38 PM
Redog
Electrical
4
Feb 26, 2008 02:50 PM
Huron
Small Blocks
2
Mar 16, 2007 06:18 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:21 AM.