SBO #7 Heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old November 26th, 2021, 02:05 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Thirdcoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: South Texas Crossroads
Posts: 91
Question SBO #7 Heads

I have a set of 1971 #7 heads and to the best of my ability, have concluded (from published head spec's) that the combustion chamber volume is 64 cc's.

So using the data from all components of my 355 SBO engine and using a CR Calculator, I come up with approximately 9.59:1 compression..

My question is how accurate is the 64 cc number for a set of stock #7 heads??

Thanks,

Thirdcoast

Last edited by Thirdcoast; November 26th, 2021 at 02:17 PM.
Thirdcoast is offline  
Old November 26th, 2021, 03:00 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,973
They’re typically 68-70cc but need to be measured to be sure.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old November 26th, 2021, 03:18 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Thirdcoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: South Texas Crossroads
Posts: 91
Ok, I was taking the Olds Junction specs for the #7 heads (64) and figured it was factory minimum to allow for manufacturing variables as NHRA specs 60.5 cc as minimum..

I recalculated the compression and using 68 cc's still have 9.21 CR.. I cannot measure the chambers right now as the engine is still in the car.. just an exercise to see how NON-Ethanol Gas with an octane rating of 90 will fare in this engine.. This fuel is readily available in my area due to the huge boat motor use.. $3.09 per gallon

What do you think CutlassEFI?? This ought to do OK until I get the new Eddies What compression would be too much for 90 Octane NON-Ethanol

Thirdcoast
Thirdcoast is offline  
Old November 26th, 2021, 03:54 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,973
At 9.2:1 you’re fine with 90 octane. BUT use a wideband to tune it right.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old November 26th, 2021, 04:03 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Thirdcoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: South Texas Crossroads
Posts: 91
Absolutely, I user the AEM unit that you recommended..

BTW, the jet recommendations worked out great, my 64 is running better with the 355 in her than she ever has !!

Thanks for all the help you provide this forum
Thirdcoast is offline  
Old November 27th, 2021, 05:42 AM
  #6  
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melville, Saskatchewan
Posts: 9,142
I ran 87, Olds 350 with 9 to 1 and a 214/214 cam. I ran aggressive timing, 22 initial, 38 in by 2600 with 30 degrees of vacuum advance on manifold vacuum. I did get low speed bucking, a 20 degree vacuum advance can fixed it. The cam used makes a big difference and you having it properly tuned will also make a massive difference.
olds 307 and 403 is offline  
Old November 27th, 2021, 05:57 AM
  #7  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 48,255
First, any document that lists a single number for head CCs is wrong. These were mass-produced sand castings. There was 2 - 4 cc variability in chamber volume just from the manufacturing process.
Second, any machining of the valve seats or milling of the head surface changes the as-cast CC number.
Third, Olds typically cast heads on the large side to allow extra metal for head rebuilding (or assembly line reworking) without excessively raising the CR.
Fourth, the published numbers you do see are the NHRA Stock Class blueprint numbers. These are NOT the as-delivered numbers. These are the size chamber you are allowed to run and still be legal in NHRA stock classes. This is why you blueprint an engine. The blueprint numbers have nothing to do with what a particular casting will check out at.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old November 27th, 2021, 10:22 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Inline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Chicago suburbs, Finland
Posts: 1,882
My 7A-heads as an example are 66cc AFTER installing new bigger valves, and cutting the deck twice ( first guy did cut it too coarse for MML-gasket), and "polishing" chambers just enough to get rid of the highest ridges.
Inline is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oldsmoboogie
442
6
November 22nd, 2021 08:08 AM
Via3d
Small Blocks
2
May 20th, 2018 05:41 AM
Joe King
Small Blocks
3
September 11th, 2017 06:14 AM
Fletchmo72
Small Blocks
14
July 18th, 2016 01:01 PM
firsttimeoldsowner
General Discussion
6
May 28th, 2015 06:43 AM



Quick Reply: SBO #7 Heads



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:21 AM.