Is this right?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old September 25th, 2009, 12:46 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
nukesec1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: East Central Illinois
Posts: 164
Is this right?

I have always been a Chevy guy since I bought my first one back in high school. '78 Z28. So I am extemely retarded when it comes to the Olds engine. But I heard somebody say the other day that the Olds BB heads will fit on an Olds SB. Is this true? Or is this guy I heard this from a bigger idiot than me?
nukesec1 is offline  
Old September 25th, 2009, 12:50 PM
  #2  
car guy
 
gearheads78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 5,660
Originally Posted by nukesec1
I have always been a Chevy guy since I bought my first one back in high school. '78 Z28. So I am extemely retarded when it comes to the Olds engine. But I heard somebody say the other day that the Olds BB heads will fit on an Olds SB. Is this true? Or is this guy I heard this from a bigger idiot than me?
Bolt on yes but you will kill the compression because of the larger chambers.
gearheads78 is offline  
Old September 25th, 2009, 01:25 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
svnt442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Palm Bay, FL
Posts: 4,249
And it would require the use of either an Edelbrock Performer RPM or Victor intake due to the taller BBO intake ports.
svnt442 is offline  
Old September 25th, 2009, 01:28 PM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
nukesec1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: East Central Illinois
Posts: 164
OK, so the valves are bigger in the BB heads vs the SB from what I have read. As far as the "compression" goes......If I had a SB Olds and put BB heads on it I would have to up the piston compression "alot" to compensate or even see a notable performance increase. Therefore I would really gain nothing by going to a BB head? I told you I was retarded about the Olds power plant. It's kinda like learning to tie my shoes again after 40 years.
nukesec1 is offline  
Old September 25th, 2009, 01:29 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
nukesec1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: East Central Illinois
Posts: 164
Originally Posted by svnt442
And it would require the use of either an Edelbrock Performer RPM or Victor intake due to the taller BBO intake ports.
That too! I wondered how it would change the geometry of the intake.
nukesec1 is offline  
Old September 25th, 2009, 01:57 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
nukesec1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: East Central Illinois
Posts: 164
Look at the CS in my profile pic. It's granny's car! On one hand I want soooooooo badly to preserve it's 32K mile originality. I want to so, so badly! But, DAMN! I started out thinking "You know, I could put some SSII's with some thin white walls on it because that "was" and option. And that dual exhaust was an option. And so was bullet sport mirrors, it was an option." Now, I'm looking into performance and how I can change or alter this Olds without ruining it's collector value with bolt on stuff. Someone has to stop me from making a grave mistake or sell me a '73 Cut Sup that I can molest!
nukesec1 is offline  
Old September 25th, 2009, 05:54 PM
  #7  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,669
Lets clarify a little. All 1964-1990 Olds heads are geometrically interchangeable. The only fundamental external difference between the big block Olds and small block Olds motors is the deck height. It's more like the difference between a Chrysler 383 and 440. All other meaningful geometry (bore centers, port spacing, physical size) is the same.

Yes, there are a number of important internal differences. The big ones as far as head swaps are the head bolt sizes and the chamber size. All 1977-1990 Olds motors use 1/2" head bolts, the 64-76 motors use 7/16" head bolts. Early heads can be drilled to accept later bolts. All BBO motors use 80-ish cc chambers - CR was varied with piston dish size. SBO motors used a combination of dish and chamber size to vary CR. SBO chambers could vary from 60 ccs to about 80 ccs. A lot of folks have successfully installed BBO heads on SBO motors by swapping the pistons to achieve the desired CR.

As noted, the ports and valves are larger on the BBO heads. You can successfully install BBO-sized valve in SBO heads - the factory did it on the W-31 motors. BBO ports are larger than SBO ports, but the "geometry" doesn't change. The only issue is using an intake manifold that has enough meat to be port-matched to the heads.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old September 25th, 2009, 06:05 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Nilsson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,076
Originally Posted by nukesec1
Look at the CS in my profile pic. It's granny's car! On one hand I want soooooooo badly to preserve it's 32K mile originality. I want to so, so badly! But, DAMN! I started out thinking "You know, I could put some SSII's with some thin white walls on it because that "was" and option. And that dual exhaust was an option. And so was bullet sport mirrors, it was an option." Now, I'm looking into performance and how I can change or alter this Olds without ruining it's collector value with bolt on stuff. Someone has to stop me from making a grave mistake or sell me a '73 Cut Sup that I can molest!
Do whatever you want with it short of cutting on it. Save the original parts and stash them away for when and if you want to return it to original.
Nilsson is offline  
Old September 25th, 2009, 06:14 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
stevengerard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chi-town
Posts: 4,520
yeah, enjoy it and save the parts, I'd start out with changing rims and leave that for a bit and enjoy it
stevengerard is offline  
Old September 28th, 2009, 09:21 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Eightupman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Leasburg, NC
Posts: 1,190
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
The only fundamental external difference between the big block Olds and small block Olds motors is the deck height..
The engine is 1 1/2" wider at the intake and the centerline (from crank to intake) height is 1/2" (or maybe 3/4") taller

Originally Posted by joe_padavano
The only issue is using an intake manifold that has enough meat to be port-matched to the heads.
A cast stock 403 manifold is just that beast. It has enough meat to raise the roof and match the port of the BBO head.

Friend of mine is running a set of "E" heads on a 403. Essentially the same combustion chamber as the 4A heads he took off, but without the smaller ports. Of course this is a well build 11-12 second motor.

John

Last edited by Eightupman; September 28th, 2009 at 09:31 PM.
Eightupman is offline  
Old September 29th, 2009, 06:32 AM
  #11  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,669
Originally Posted by Eightupman
The engine is 1 1/2" wider at the intake and the centerline (from crank to intake) height is 1/2" (or maybe 3/4") taller
Since the cylinders are angled at 45 deg, the 1 1/2" wider intake is 3/4" per side, which is the same 3/4" in height. Of course, all of that stems from the approx 1" greater deck height. Geometry is your friend.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old September 29th, 2009, 10:56 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Eightupman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Leasburg, NC
Posts: 1,190
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Since the cylinders are angled at 45 deg, the 1 1/2" wider intake is 3/4" per side, which is the same 3/4" in height. Of course, all of that stems from the approx 1" greater deck height. Geometry is your friend.
Understood. I wasn't disagreeing. I was explaining it differently for those who may not understand "deck height"

I like geometery. I use it in raquetteball.

John
Eightupman is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
chip_gikey
Eighty-Eight
1
December 11th, 2007 01:57 PM
GOLD72OLDS
General Discussion
4
September 27th, 2007 11:40 PM
jeffs 89 cutlass salon
Chassis/Body/Frame
0
September 22nd, 2007 05:28 PM
gerlof_1
Small Blocks
1
January 11th, 2007 08:31 AM
Redog
Eighty-Eight
0
November 15th, 2006 09:27 PM



Quick Reply: Is this right?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:52 PM.