Question about Deck Clearance & Compression

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old January 2nd, 2014, 03:51 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HitTheHole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 81
Question about Deck Clearance & Compression

I have a 1970 Olds 350 with #6 heads. I'm having it bored 0.30 over and using I-beam 4340 racing rods with Probe 14475-030 pistons, 3cc dish, 1.625" compression height. The heads combustion chamber volumes are 64cc, bore 4.087", stroke 3.385", probably use a 0.040 head gasket. The heads are being completely reworked with 2.0"/1.65" valves, ported & polished. The variable here is deck clearance. Is there any way to figure out what that might be before any milling? I'm actually worried about compression being TOO HIGH for pump gas. Using a number of .025" for deck clearance, I come up with 9.98:1 compression but that number is a "guesstimate". Can anyone provide me with a more accurate estimate for deck clearance or advise me on the compression? Thanks!
HitTheHole is offline  
Old January 2nd, 2014, 04:10 PM
  #2  
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
coppercutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 8,632
sounds similar to my current running gear. also make sure you have true 64 cc's. Use this. At zero deck you are at 10.62 to 1 compression . at .025 you are at 9.98 to 1. That's where I am on my current 355 and im good on pump gas 93 im at .025 in the cylinders with my speed pros. Currently building a 355 with probe pistons as well that block is at zero deck but the heads are closer to 70 cc's they are also #6 heads.


This the calculator I use.


http://www.rbracing-rsr.com/compstaticcalc.html
coppercutlass is offline  
Old January 2nd, 2014, 04:20 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,976
What octane do you have available? 91? 93?

When you have the heads done just have them polish the chambers as well.
That'll minimize the chance of detonation in two ways, a smooth surface and lowering compression ratio by having a larger chamber.

Cam selection will be important as well. Make sure you enough cam in it to bleed of some pressure at low rpms but not too much to make it a pig.

Best of luck in your build.
cutlassefi is online now  
Old January 2nd, 2014, 04:22 PM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HitTheHole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 81
So did you get "closer to 70cc" combustion chamber in your heads as a result of having the heads reworked? With a deck clearance of 0.10" that would give me 9.7:1 which is where I'd like to be.
HitTheHole is offline  
Old January 2nd, 2014, 04:24 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,976
Which rods are you using? Who makes them?
cutlassefi is online now  
Old January 2nd, 2014, 04:29 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HitTheHole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 81
Chevron Supreme is 92 octane. Does that work for a 9.7:1 compression engine without experiencing detonation? I'll be running an HEI distributor with the option of using an advance curve kit, if needed.
HitTheHole is offline  
Old January 2nd, 2014, 04:31 PM
  #7  
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
coppercutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 8,632
Hit the hole cutlassefi brings up a good point before you deck the surface makes sure how far you are in after the new pistons and rods. I have ran mine on 91 92 93 no issue. #6 heads are realisticly closer to 68 cc's . If you have the chambers polished before than that will gain you some cc volume but the oversized valves will also take up some chamber volume. The only way to figure it out is to cc the head and pre assembly steps to get you your measurements to make sure you beck the surface the correct amount.
coppercutlass is offline  
Old January 2nd, 2014, 04:32 PM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HitTheHole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 81
OldsRocketParts.com Small Block I-Beam Racing Rods
http://www.oldsrocketparts.com/produ...eam-race-rods/
HitTheHole is offline  
Old January 2nd, 2014, 04:35 PM
  #9  
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
coppercutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 8,632
From what I have heard mondello is behind those and the sale of them. For your hp needs and goals you may be better off reconditioning your stock rods if they check out and avoid the scammers.
coppercutlass is offline  
Old January 2nd, 2014, 04:37 PM
  #10  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HitTheHole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 81
Stock Olds rods are the "weak link" of the engine. I got the new set of rods for $299 which, in my opinion, was a great price. Stronger, lighter, no cost for reconditioning.
HitTheHole is offline  
Old January 2nd, 2014, 04:40 PM
  #11  
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
coppercutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 8,632
I have spun them up but pretty high with no issues Lots of guys have. I belive these rods are also pretty new and made by procomp overseas. Take that with a grain of salt. Maybe chebby rod and piston combo will be better with a well known rod brand like scat.
coppercutlass is offline  
Old January 2nd, 2014, 04:46 PM
  #12  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HitTheHole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 81
Of course, everything will be balanced and tolerances measured. I considered using Chevy rods and reworking the crank but in the end, decided against it. Decided not to go with the Speed-Pro/TRW pistons because of issues with quality, tolerances and piston rattle. Considered going with custom 6cc JE or Diamond pistons but at $1,000 and a wait time of 3-4 weeks, decided against it. I've already purchased the rods and Probe pistons so I'll let you know how it turns out.
HitTheHole is offline  
Old January 2nd, 2014, 04:49 PM
  #13  
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
coppercutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 8,632
Good luck let us know how it goes. Im currently running speed pro's on stock rods with 9.9x to 1 compression . It gets beat hard no issues yet knock on wood lol.
coppercutlass is offline  
Old January 2nd, 2014, 05:05 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,976
If you got them for $299.00 then go for it, just have them checked.
9.7:1 on 92 should be fine. What cam did you go with?
And the Probes are lighter and have a better ring pack than the Speed Pros.
However they will need at least as much clearance as the Speed Pros. If you can keep the compression ratio in check that should prove to be a good combination.
cutlassefi is online now  
Old January 2nd, 2014, 05:13 PM
  #15  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HitTheHole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 81
Thanks, Cutlassefi. I haven't chosen a cam yet. I don't know enough to make an educated choice. So many to choose from. I'm going to rely on my builder to help out with that choice. Using Edelbrock Performer 2711 manifold with Edelbrock Thunder Series AVS Carb, 650cm, electric choke, Thornton exhaust manifolds, 2.5" MagnaFlow exhaust, TH350 and posi 3.23 rear end. I'd prefer not to have a rough idle. Suggestions? Keep in mind the heads are completely reworked with 2.0"/1.65" valves, ported & polished.
HitTheHole is offline  
Old January 2nd, 2014, 05:24 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
Octania's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,286
Originally Posted by coppercutlass
I have spun them up but pretty high with no issues Lots of guys have. I belive these rods are also pretty new and made by procomp overseas. Take that with a grain of salt. Maybe chebby rod and piston combo will be better with a well known rod brand like scat.
SCAT parts are "the Shyt"

ha ha ha

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/scat?s=t

"scat3 [skat]
noun
the excrement of an animal."

Avoid "C.A.T." brand main girdles I guess:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/151173321106...84.m1555.l2649
Octania is offline  
Old January 2nd, 2014, 05:51 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,976
Originally Posted by HitTheHole
Thanks, Cutlassefi. I haven't chosen a cam yet. I don't know enough to make an educated choice. So many to choose from. I'm going to rely on my builder to help out with that choice. too many builders just look in a book and pick one out with their eyes closed, they normally don't possess the knowledge to really know what they're picking. Using Edelbrock Performer 2711 manifold wrong intake to go along with the rest of your combo with Edelbrock Thunder Series AVS Carb, 650cm, electric choke, Ok Thornton exhaust manifolds, 2.5" MagnaFlow exhaust, TH350 and posi 3.23 rear end. I'd prefer not to have a rough idle. No problem Suggestions? Keep in mind the heads are completely reworked with 2.0"/1.65" valves, ported & polished.
With your mods you need the 7111 intake and a cam with some decent lift to take advantage of the ported heads. And lift has little to no effect on drivability. Duration and overlap effect that.

Let me know if I can help.

Last edited by cutlassefi; January 2nd, 2014 at 05:55 PM.
cutlassefi is online now  
Old January 2nd, 2014, 06:29 PM
  #18  
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
coppercutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 8,632
Im running a howards 512/512 227/234 duration @.050 cam and it has a nice lopey idle but it is very smooth idles in the 700 rpm range . Pulls very strong .Don't know what you mean by rough as far as sound or idle consistency . Im sure mark can set ya up with a cam.
coppercutlass is offline  
Old January 2nd, 2014, 07:01 PM
  #19  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HitTheHole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 81
Too late now to turn back on the manifold. It's going to be the 2711 (fully polished).
HitTheHole is offline  
Old January 2nd, 2014, 07:03 PM
  #20  
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
coppercutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 8,632
That intake is going to act like cork on your combo.
coppercutlass is offline  
Old January 2nd, 2014, 07:08 PM
  #21  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HitTheHole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 81
If I need to, I can always put a spacer on it for more air flow. I just don't anticipate running RPM's that high.

Last edited by HitTheHole; January 2nd, 2014 at 07:16 PM.
HitTheHole is offline  
Old January 3rd, 2014, 05:10 AM
  #22  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,976
That won't help it, those runners are teenie tiny.
Wrong intake. If you keep it then you may as well just put stock heads on it along with a stock cam.
Wrong intake.
cutlassefi is online now  
Old January 3rd, 2014, 06:23 PM
  #23  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HitTheHole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 81
Is anyone aware of any problems with hood clearance on a '70 cutlass if I used the RPM manifold on my 350 with an Edelbrock Pro-Flo Series air cleaner (net height from carb flange 3.75")?
HitTheHole is offline  
Old January 3rd, 2014, 07:21 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,976
Originally Posted by HitTheHole
Is anyone aware of any problems with hood clearance on a '70 cutlass if I used the RPM manifold on my 350 with an Edelbrock Pro-Flo Series air cleaner (net height from carb flange 3.75")?

RPM will fit fine under your hood, with just about any air filter. Some need drop bases but most will fit.
cutlassefi is online now  
Old January 6th, 2014, 03:50 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
Fun71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 14,719
Agreed. I have the RPM on my '71 with a generic 14" air cleaner and I actually put a slightly taller air filter on it with no clearance issues.
Fun71 is offline  
Old January 6th, 2014, 03:54 PM
  #26  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HitTheHole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 81
Thanks Fun71. Good to know. I ordered the RPM today. Was just hoping to avoid any surprise clearance issues. Since I'm using fully polished, it takes a while to get them. Didn't want to hold up the build if it interfered with the hood.
HitTheHole is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
W-27
General Questions
20
October 13th, 2015 09:20 AM
hinz57
General Discussion
2
April 5th, 2011 04:19 PM
greenslade
Big Blocks
14
March 29th, 2011 03:56 PM
cts-v
Big Blocks
10
January 10th, 2009 04:55 PM
captjim
Small Blocks
3
September 23rd, 2008 05:21 AM



Quick Reply: Question about Deck Clearance & Compression



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:09 AM.