German inspection - CO measurement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 26, 2014 | 05:40 AM
  #1  
Nop's Avatar
Nop
Thread Starter
2-stroke 1-cylinder guy
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 333
From: Bavaria, Germany
German inspection - CO measurement

Hi!

Had my exhaust sniffed yesterday for my first inspection. Idle CO at 750-800rpm in park is at 4.8vol%, both exhaust pipes. Value needs to be at a maximum of 4.5% for 1970 vehicles.

A '72 El Camino was in their database, Chevy small block with a QJet, had 4.0/4.2% at measurement and the guys said QJets should normally be able to get under 4.5% quite easily.

While I set my ignition timings already, I have no ringing and the engine isn't too far on the rich side, I actually wanted to rebuild my carb (rebuild set already here) after registration without hassle and not rip it apart now before May 6th.

Question:

Does anybody have experience in setting idle lean/rich in combination with live CO measurement? Do I have a chance to get down to or below 4.5% with just playing with the idle mixture screws?

I could get away with a rough running idle for the printout and go back to my current settings after that.

Last edited by Nop; Apr 26, 2014 at 05:49 AM.
Old Apr 26, 2014 | 05:57 AM
  #2  
CQR's Avatar
CQR
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,339
From: Denver, CO.
Leaning out your idle mixture screws should bring down your CO at idle. 4.8% is high(rich) on a stock engine. It would probably only take about 1/2 turn in on each screw to get you below the 4.5% mark. You want to turn them in until you get just a roughness in the idle then back out just enough until it smooths out as a rule of thumb. Do they also test for HC?
Old Apr 26, 2014 | 06:04 AM
  #3  
pogo69's Avatar
morgan
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,925
From: CT
another tip...put the car on defrost so the idle will pick up a couple hundreds
Old Apr 26, 2014 | 09:36 PM
  #4  
Fun71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15,433
From: Phoenix, AZ
My car goes through emissions testing every year. The CO idle limit is 5.0% and I easily pass that, typically with a value below 0.5%. Your engine must need some tuning if you are getting 4.8% at idle.

What distributor are you using and what is your initial setting?

Things that really help my engine are:
- disconnect the vacuum advance
- set the initial advance to 10º
- use low octane fuel

I have a spreadsheet with the test results for the past 15 years and I see an increase in CO with high octane (91) fuel vs. low octane (87) fuel. Another tip is to add methanol or ethanol (I use E-85) so there is about 20-25% alcohol. This one thing REALLY drops the readings for both CO and HC. I've had as low as 37 ppm HC and 0.12% CO with this tuning.
Old Apr 27, 2014 | 12:24 AM
  #5  
nsnarsk65cutlass's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 979
From: Grass Valley Ca
You have an over rich condition either caused by a float-needle and seat problem or the mixture screws are are out too far.Nick
Old Apr 27, 2014 | 06:35 AM
  #6  
Nop's Avatar
Nop
Thread Starter
2-stroke 1-cylinder guy
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 333
From: Bavaria, Germany
Originally Posted by CQR
4.8% is high(rich) on a stock engine.
Yes, by far - but I don't have any experience for 70's V8s so far.

Originally Posted by CQR
It would probably only take about 1/2 turn in on each screw to get you below the 4.5% mark.
So it's possible. I'll adjust it on Monday/Tuesday with the sniffer connected when I'm there again.
Originally Posted by CQR
Do they also test for HC?
Just idle CO without catalytic converter.

Originally Posted by Fun71
typically with a value below 0.5%
Now that's a number.

Originally Posted by Fun71
What distributor are you using and what is your initial setting?
New Pertronix, new spark plugs and wires, stock QJet, Stock air cleaner and housing.

~10 to 12 degrees @ 1000 to 1200rpm with vacuum connected.

Originally Posted by Fun71
an increase in CO with high octane (91) fuel vs. low octane (87) fuel.
Yikes. I'm on 102 Octane plus lead replacement for now.

So I'll do my homework and let them sniff again Monday or Tuesday.

Thanks, Gentlemen!

Stefan
Old Apr 27, 2014 | 07:00 AM
  #7  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by Nop
Yikes. I'm on 102 Octane plus lead replacement for now.
Your octane is different from our octane. This misunderstanding has destroyed engines.

You use the Research (RON) system, while we use the Anti-Knock Index (AKI or RON+MON/2) system.
The RON rating is usually about 4-5 points higher than the AKI system for the same fuel.
Your system is the system we used to use when these cars were made.

The average gas station in the US now sells gasoline between 87 and 93 octane, which corresponds roughly to 92 to 98 octane on your side of the pond.
Since our premium-fuel cars were made to run on 100 octane (102 or 103 octane for the W-30s and other high-performance cars), none of the gas commonly available over here has enough octane fo them, but it is close.

If you have a premium fuel 350 (one that came from the factory with a four barrel carb.), then, in theory at least, you should only need 100 octane.

You do not need a lead substitute unless you are constantly drag racing or towing a heavy trailer through the Alps, but are certainly welcome to use one if you prefer.

- Eric
Old Apr 27, 2014 | 09:51 PM
  #8  
Nop's Avatar
Nop
Thread Starter
2-stroke 1-cylinder guy
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 333
From: Bavaria, Germany
Originally Posted by MDchanic
Your octane is different from our octane. This misunderstanding has destroyed engines.
Sorry, Eric - I know it but forgot to mention it: "At least 102ROZ, no bio Ethanol but bio Ether", so 97/98 Octane on your side of the globe.

Lunch break update:

Warmed her up, turned both idle mixture screws in 2 and a half turns exactly. While I didn't check what position(s) I started at (bummer!), both screws give a rough idle after another quarter turn.

Now, shame on me - of course it's too rich after dumping the shiny open edelbrock air filter housing in favour of a stock housing.

I'll let them sniff my rear end again after work today.

Last edited by Nop; Apr 28, 2014 at 04:22 AM.
Old Apr 29, 2014 | 11:26 AM
  #9  
Nop's Avatar
Nop
Thread Starter
2-stroke 1-cylinder guy
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 333
From: Bavaria, Germany
Passed: 1.791vol% at 610rpm. With very old oil, 102ROZ and no further tricks but the idle mixture screws.

Attached Images
File Type: jpg
2014-04-29_15-25-39_298.jpg (46.5 KB, 72 views)
Old Apr 29, 2014 | 01:11 PM
  #10  
Sircajun's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 135
From: Roskilde, Denmark
Congrats on passing the test. Is it ready for registration now?
Old Apr 29, 2014 | 04:59 PM
  #11  
citcapp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,127
From: Rathdrum, Idano
Congrats your on the road
Old Apr 29, 2014 | 05:23 PM
  #12  
Koda's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 12,851
From: Evansville, IN
Originally Posted by Fun71
My car goes through emissions testing every year. The CO idle limit is 5.0% and I easily pass that, typically with a value below 0.5%. Your engine must need some tuning if you are getting 4.8% at idle.

What distributor are you using and what is your initial setting?

Things that really help my engine are:
- disconnect the vacuum advance
- set the initial advance to 10º
- use low octane fuel

I have a spreadsheet with the test results for the past 15 years and I see an increase in CO with high octane (91) fuel vs. low octane (87) fuel. Another tip is to add methanol or ethanol (I use E-85) so there is about 20-25% alcohol. This one thing REALLY drops the readings for both CO and HC. I've had as low as 37 ppm HC and 0.12% CO with this tuning.

This is great info. I always joked about running inspections on moonshine.
Old Apr 29, 2014 | 05:46 PM
  #13  
Fun71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15,433
From: Phoenix, AZ
I figure if the state is going to emissions test a 40+ year old car that drives a few thousand miles per year then I will play their game, but not by their rules.

These emissions tests were implemented by the same geniuses who decided to start monitoring the air quality for particulate matter. Well guess what, it's a desert and the wind blows, so there are gonna be particulates in the air. Dumbasses. Their solution to the "problem" was to mandate paving all roads within the county. Pretty soon we'll have to pave over the entire desert to be in "compliance".

Last edited by Fun71; Apr 29, 2014 at 05:50 PM.
Old Apr 29, 2014 | 09:34 PM
  #14  
Nop's Avatar
Nop
Thread Starter
2-stroke 1-cylinder guy
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 333
From: Bavaria, Germany
Uhhh, while I passed the emissions test and the technical part, paperwork is not yet done.

The Inspection engineer cowardly refuses to fill in the 1970 maximum for loudness and required a measurement for that - next Tuesday.

Other than that: OK.

Stefan
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
D Appeldorn
Eighty-Eight
10
Mar 20, 2011 01:37 PM
sbstr
The Newbie Forum
2
Oct 11, 2010 12:16 PM
German442
General Discussion
24
Aug 28, 2009 02:20 PM
Lima-Gaucho
Eighty-Eight
26
Aug 7, 2009 12:18 PM
scott_442
Cutlass
5
Mar 21, 2009 08:22 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:26 AM.