Best Header Selection for a '76 Cutlass Supreme

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 13, 2016 | 12:51 PM
  #1  
76Champ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 11
From: East Tennessee
Best Header Selection for a '76 Cutlass Supreme

Hey all. This is my first post and look forward to many more. I am currently building a '72 Olds 350 for my '76 Cutlass Supreme. There seems to be a variety of opinions on headers that will fit. Looking for input from those of you that may have the same model. I would be OK with using a small size starter if necessary. I would rather buy a set of headers that don't have to be "modified" to fit around the frame or suspension.
Old Feb 13, 2016 | 04:16 PM
  #2  
76olds's Avatar
Hookers under Hood
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,543
From: Ontario, Canada
I installed a set of Hedman Shorties in my 76 along with a Powermaster mini starter. The headers fit great no issues not a scratch on them. The only problem I had was with the drivers side exhaust pipe. If you have a look in my photo album here you'll see what I mean. I went with 2 1/4 pipe.
I hope this helps
Eric
Old Feb 16, 2016 | 07:01 PM
  #3  
76Champ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 11
From: East Tennessee
Thanks for info, Eric. I was looking at the Hedman Shorties and Long Tube as options. Thanks for the reference to the Powermaster Starter, as well as the driver's side exhaust pipe. Great info!
Old Mar 27, 2016 | 02:42 PM
  #4  
76Champ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 11
From: East Tennessee
Eric - do you happen to have the Hedman Model number?
Old Mar 27, 2016 | 08:47 PM
  #5  
76olds's Avatar
Hookers under Hood
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,543
From: Ontario, Canada
Lance, I had to call hedman directly and ask for the ceramic coating put on part # HED-58160, this was about 2 years ago now. I had to wait 6 weeks because they didn't have any in stock.
Just be sure you want to go with shorties and not long tube. I was wanting more bottom end then top end, that was why I went with the short ones.
Also is you have a look in my photo galary, the front driver side exhaust pipe was a bit of a bugger to fab up, only reason was I didn't want it hanging low. I liked it better with the exhaust pipes tucked up a little more.
Hope this helps
Eric

Last edited by 76olds; Mar 27, 2016 at 08:51 PM. Reason: see photos
Old Apr 3, 2016 | 02:25 PM
  #6  
76Champ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 11
From: East Tennessee
Hedman 58060, Long Tubes fit like a glove. Had to remove the lower stabilizer bars, make a couple small dents to clear the A-Arms but other than that perfect fit. Sent them to a local shop to ceramic coat inside and outside. Almost got this thing back on the road! Started it and broke in on the test stand. Sounds amazing!
Old Apr 3, 2016 | 02:40 PM
  #7  
76olds's Avatar
Hookers under Hood
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,543
From: Ontario, Canada
That good news, I haven't heard of anyone with our year car running the long tube headers.
So this info will certainly help many guys thinking about them.
Thanks for the updates what type of gaskets did you choose to install them with ?

Eric
Old Apr 3, 2016 | 05:30 PM
  #8  
76Champ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 11
From: East Tennessee
Going to try the Hedman Gaskets unless you guys have any other suggestions.
Old Apr 3, 2016 | 06:00 PM
  #9  
76olds's Avatar
Hookers under Hood
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,543
From: Ontario, Canada
I don't have any experience with the supplied hedman gaskets, I was told I should purchase some graphite ones here at Performance Improvements. So I asked the CO forum here and many guys also backed up the graphite ones.
I went with the Remflex Graphite ones, have had good luck with them so far going on 3 summers now.
I hope this helps
Eric
Old Apr 4, 2016 | 07:42 AM
  #10  
80 Rocket's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 383
Originally Posted by 76olds
I was wanting more bottom end then top end, that was why I went with the short ones.
Actually, shorty headers do not give you more bottom end. Shorty headers were simply made for ease of installation.


The primary OD of your tubes can give you more torque if you choose a smaller size.


However, long tube headers will always give you more TQ and more HP throughout the powerband over a set of shorties. It is the sizing of the primary tubes, length of primary tubes, size of collector and length of collector that should be considered for your intended application.


I am helping a young guy building his 350 for a 76 442. He had some shop install headers on it before I met him. They did not remove the lower stablilizer bars and the headers are all beat to hell to the point one tube looks like it might not be able to breathe anymore. Completely crap installation.
Old Apr 4, 2016 | 01:05 PM
  #11  
76olds's Avatar
Hookers under Hood
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,543
From: Ontario, Canada
I just copied and pasted this off the net, not sure how correct this is as to 80 rockets evaluations with real time engine builds but here it is for those who are interested.


For a variety of reasons that involve physics, it turns out that long tube headers do the best job building horsepower and torque from mid-to-high RPMs. These are great for high-revving machines and track terrors, but they do sacrifice some of the low-RPM power that most drivers depend on.
On the other side of the coin, shorty headers deliver more power horsepower and torque from idle to the mid-RPM range. This makes shorty headers perfect for your daily commute or hauling your boat up a hill. We'll also note that sometimes short tubes can be easier to install. Check out some exhaust header reviews to get the inside scoop on installation.
Old Apr 4, 2016 | 02:21 PM
  #12  
BlackGold's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,587
From: West Michigan
Originally Posted by 76olds
....On the other side of the coin, shorty headers deliver more power horsepower and torque from idle to the mid-RPM range. This makes shorty headers perfect for your daily commute or hauling your boat up a hill.
That is completely contradictory to everything I've ever read about headers -- both theory and tests. Sounds like marketing to me.
Old Apr 4, 2016 | 02:24 PM
  #13  
80 Rocket's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 383
Originally Posted by 76olds
I just copied and pasted this off the net, not sure how correct this is as to 80 rockets evaluations with real time engine builds but here it is for those who are interested.


For a variety of reasons that involve physics, it turns out that long tube headers do the best job building horsepower and torque from mid-to-high RPMs. These are great for high-revving machines and track terrors, but they do sacrifice some of the low-RPM power that most drivers depend on.
On the other side of the coin, shorty headers deliver more power horsepower and torque from idle to the mid-RPM range. This makes shorty headers perfect for your daily commute or hauling your boat up a hill. We'll also note that sometimes short tubes can be easier to install. Check out some exhaust header reviews to get the inside scoop on installation.

What is sounds like is an advertisement from a company trying to sell shorty headers. Do you notice how they don't explain the physics of it?


The lower the peak power RPM, the longer the primary tube must be. It's the same principle with the intake runners. You know why Olds made so much more torque from the factory? Longer intake runners then other makes out there. The same wave tuning principles apply to the exhaust.
Old Apr 4, 2016 | 05:46 PM
  #14  
76olds's Avatar
Hookers under Hood
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,543
From: Ontario, Canada
Don, as you know I'm just a bolt on guy/check writer as most serious car guys would say. If the info isn't correct from the web along with the tech guys at hedman then it could very well be a marketing deal.
At the end of the day, I was happy with my purchase, with the look of my purchase after the install. As for Performance with just the headers/duals alone I would not know.
I had many things done at once, including my rear 3:42 gears and posi, along with the 2 1/4 duals along with the torque converter.
I can say my boat of a 76 comes off the line much quicker and picks up much better than before, for a stock #8 headed smog 350.
I hope this helps other guys with 73-77 smog 350 Olds engines than run awesome but just looking for a bit more.

Eric

Last edited by 76olds; Apr 4, 2016 at 05:51 PM.
Old Apr 4, 2016 | 05:59 PM
  #15  
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,129
From: Melville, Saskatchewan
Sanderson 1 5/8" or Hooker Comp 1 5/8" long tubes headers should make more bottom end torque. Either way, they all add 20+ HP/TQ over awesome SBO manifolds, you just get more with long tubes.
Old Apr 4, 2016 | 06:12 PM
  #16  
76olds's Avatar
Hookers under Hood
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,543
From: Ontario, Canada
Put-r-ther, Thanks for chiming in Olds 307 and 403 , adds 20hp/tq, Ill tip back another Jack to that. I'm feelin' better now !!
Cheers
Eric
Old Apr 4, 2016 | 07:01 PM
  #17  
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,129
From: Melville, Saskatchewan
Basing that off a Mopar Muscle test. Used a 300 HP 318 magnum crate engine, started off with restrictive truck/van manifold, necked down to fit under the van dog house. Very similar to our manifolds, I owned a set. Then they used 360 and 340 Hi Po manifolds, 11hp and 13hp. Probably Thornton manifolds with mild massaging would probably equal the 340 manifolds. Anyway the gains were 20 HP with shorty headers, 26 HP with long tubes and similar torque gains equal to horsepower gained.
Old Apr 5, 2016 | 07:07 AM
  #18  
80 Rocket's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 383
Originally Posted by 76olds
Don, as you know I'm just a bolt on guy/check writer as most serious car guys would say. If the info isn't correct from the web along with the tech guys at hedman then it could very well be a marketing deal.
At the end of the day, I was happy with my purchase, with the look of my purchase after the install. As for Performance with just the headers/duals alone I would not know.
I had many things done at once, including my rear 3:42 gears and posi, along with the 2 1/4 duals along with the torque converter.
I can say my boat of a 76 comes off the line much quicker and picks up much better than before, for a stock #8 headed smog 350.
I hope this helps other guys with 73-77 smog 350 Olds engines than run awesome but just looking for a bit more.

Eric

Eric, I hope you don't feel you need to be defensive here. I am simply correcting incorrect information given. It's little tidbits like these that are thrown out there on message boards that one day become "facts" because someone read it on the internet.


I'm not saying you should be dissatisfied with your purchase. You have an improvement over stock for sure. Plus, the installation is so much easier.


However, I would encourage guys like you to take the time to familiarize yourself with more of the basics if you intend on having a nice street machine. It will only help you communicate more clearly with a machine shop/builder about your intended goals.
Old Apr 5, 2016 | 03:03 PM
  #19  
76olds's Avatar
Hookers under Hood
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,543
From: Ontario, Canada
No defensive action here Don,
I just stated in the thread above the reason why I went with shorty headers.
You mentioned shorty headers don't give more bottom end. ( Idle to mid rpm )
I just posted what I've read and been told.
Everyone has a story behind their beliefs I understand that.

Educating myself about the basics of engine building or what makes more power doesn't pay my bills, nor would it make me big $$. May save me a little money, but its not worth it in my case at the moment.

Thanks for posting the correct facts about the shorty headers. I'm sure this will help out others.
Time for a drink haha !!!

Cheers
Eric

Last edited by 76olds; Apr 5, 2016 at 03:14 PM. Reason: Need a drink
Old Apr 7, 2016 | 01:17 PM
  #20  
ankerclanker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 154
header question

Before I ask my question, I'm not trying to hijack anyone's thread. So if I did, I apologize now. Here is my question: Will headers that fit a 350 Olds also fit a 330? I have a set of long tube headers for a 330, but they hang to low below the frame, so looking for some shorty's. Any info would be appreciated.

tks
ted
Old Apr 7, 2016 | 01:51 PM
  #21  
76Champ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 11
From: East Tennessee
Ted - The manufacturer will list the engines the header model fits.
Old Apr 7, 2016 | 04:43 PM
  #22  
80 Rocket's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 383
Originally Posted by ankerclanker
Before I ask my question, I'm not trying to hijack anyone's thread. So if I did, I apologize now. Here is my question: Will headers that fit a 350 Olds also fit a 330? I have a set of long tube headers for a 330, but they hang to low below the frame, so looking for some shorty's. Any info would be appreciated.

tks
ted

Yes, they will fit any small block Olds. 307, 330, 350, 403
Old Apr 28, 2016 | 06:36 PM
  #23  
76Champ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 11
From: East Tennessee
One last update on this subject. After a full fit and tightening everything down, the header was right on the starter. This caused a heat soak issue. Did some research on here and ended up with a 307 Olds, High Torque OEM style starter. Better price than a mini and fit perfect to give me enough clearance. So far, heat soak issue is resolved.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CarCrazyChemist
Wheels and Tires
12
Jan 18, 2014 09:21 AM
ijasond
Big Blocks
40
May 13, 2008 08:27 AM
72Cutlass
Cutlass
4
Feb 4, 2008 02:57 PM
Oldsproject
Big Blocks
1
Jun 5, 2007 11:21 AM
bobolds
Big Blocks
11
Mar 26, 2007 02:45 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:25 PM.