1966 Cutlass - 330 - high comp or no
#1
1966 Cutlass - 330 - high comp or no
Good Morning folks. First post here on this for me. I found numbers matching 66 Holiday Coupe, all original and in good survivor shape. I have been cleaning and repairing all the minor issues to get it on the road. I have not 100% sure it is a high-compression 330, but it looks like it. I have only gotten this far cleaning, but from what I can see, it is a 330 High Compression, it has the Jetaway behind it, and the Quadrajet has been replaced.
Does anyone know for sure if this is the High-Compression motor?
CA car built in Fremont. Mostly surface "patina"
Right Head Stamping
Right Head read #3
Block
Does anyone know for sure if this is the High-Compression motor?
CA car built in Fremont. Mostly surface "patina"
Right Head Stamping
Right Head read #3
Block
#8
Thanks, man I just got it and am cleaning up the mechanicals. I will run good gas in it. The car has been sitting for quite a while
since I have to change the water pump. I am going to do the timing chain and such at the same time. I pulled it all apart on the front of the motor right after taking the bore scope pictures. I was going to do the cam, but it appears that the cam is interesting to source. So it's getting timing chain, intake, and some headers.
Thanks again.
since I have to change the water pump. I am going to do the timing chain and such at the same time. I pulled it all apart on the front of the motor right after taking the bore scope pictures. I was going to do the cam, but it appears that the cam is interesting to source. So it's getting timing chain, intake, and some headers.
Thanks again.
#9
When doing the timing chain line up #1 TDC on the
COMPRESSION stroke, remove the front cover and take a picture. Reassemble the new gears and chain and take another picture. All necessary? No, save some second guessing and head scratching later? Yep.
Good luck!!!
COMPRESSION stroke, remove the front cover and take a picture. Reassemble the new gears and chain and take another picture. All necessary? No, save some second guessing and head scratching later? Yep.
Good luck!!!
#11
We all have our opinions; quite frankly, mine is not good on the Q-Jet. I have no issues tuning it; that particular carb was on it when I got it. It will stay carburated until I fab up a manifold for sequential multiport fuel injection at one point. But thank you again for your thoughts. I was having issues with how to make 100% sure I had the High-Compression 330. I did not find the post about the U and V notches being the only way to be 100% sure.
This one will be mostly stock unlike my 71
This one will be mostly stock unlike my 71
#12
#13
#16
The low comprsson 330 is a good engine because it runs well on todays pump gas; you can even use a two to four barrel carb adapter if desired or change the intake..
Seems like more 330 low compression engines from 64 -67 are still running and survived since the leaded fuels came along.
I like your 66 factory two tone paint. My 442 is the same color, with the black painted top not your white.
Seems like more 330 low compression engines from 64 -67 are still running and survived since the leaded fuels came along.
I like your 66 factory two tone paint. My 442 is the same color, with the black painted top not your white.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post