The Newbie Forum The place where you should introduce yourself. Do not ask technical questions here, use the site forum sections.

Build tag decode?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 14, 2022 | 07:22 AM
  #1  
Chuck Dagel's Avatar
Thread Starter
1964 cutlass lover
 
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 3
From: Myrtle creek, OR
Build tag decode?

Hi there gang!, does anyone have info on this tag?

Mostly question the acc, body, paint?
Old Aug 14, 2022 | 12:51 PM
  #2  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,802
From: Northern VA
12A = built first week (A) of December (12), 1963
STYLE 3237 = Cutlass (32) Holiday Coupe (37)
KC = Kansas City assembly plant
1187 BODY = Fisher Body sequence number
TRIM 963 = Blue vinyl interior
HH PAINT = Bermuda Blue lower and upper body color
ACC Codes:
Group 1
S = Power trunk release

Group 2
X = Floor shifter for Jetaway automatic
P = Parking brake signal lamp (unconfirmed)

Group 5
Z = ???
Old Aug 14, 2022 | 08:22 PM
  #3  
Chuck Dagel's Avatar
Thread Starter
1964 cutlass lover
 
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 3
From: Myrtle creek, OR
Awesome!

Thanks so much!-you know what else is weird, is the vin tag on the door jamb doesn't include the first two characters?
Old Aug 15, 2022 | 03:49 AM
  #4  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,802
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Chuck Dagel
Thanks so much!-you know what else is weird, is the vin tag on the door jamb doesn't include the first two characters?
1964 Olds VIN tags only have 10 characters. Yours should start 824K and then have the six digit sequence number.
Old Aug 15, 2022 | 04:41 AM
  #5  
Chuck Dagel's Avatar
Thread Starter
1964 cutlass lover
 
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 3
From: Myrtle creek, OR
The vin

Originally Posted by Chuck Dagel
Hi there gang!, does anyone have info on this tag?

Mostly question the acc, body, paint?
Yea the 8 and 2 are missing at the start of the vin? Otherwise there is only 8 characters
Old Aug 15, 2022 | 05:11 AM
  #6  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,802
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Chuck Dagel
Yea the 8 and 2 are missing at the start of the vin? Otherwise there is only 8 characters
Well that's interesting. For the 1964 model year, the VIN tags for each assembly plant came pre-stamped with the last eight characters. The first two digits (the first was the engine type - six or eight cylinders, the second was the model line) were stamped on the line when the tag was assigned to a car.
Old Aug 17, 2022 | 12:40 PM
  #7  
Rallye469's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,664
From: Jacksonville, FL
Did '64's not have the year before the STYLE #?
Old Aug 17, 2022 | 12:53 PM
  #8  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,802
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Rallye469
Did '64's not have the year before the STYLE #?
Lansing cars did, but the multi-make assembly plants sometimes did their own thing on cowl tags.

Here's a Lansing tag.




Here's a Fremont tag. Note that instead of using the five group ACC codes, Fremont used the RPO codes. Fremont also added a third paint code letter for the wheels.





Of course, to throw fuel on the fire, here's a KC tag for a Pontiac.


Old Aug 17, 2022 | 02:12 PM
  #9  
rocketraider's Avatar
Oldsdruid
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 10,628
From: Southside Vajenya
Do you ever wonder how these cars ever got built?🤪
Old Aug 18, 2022 | 02:33 PM
  #10  
Rallye469's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,664
From: Jacksonville, FL
Thanks Joe...I've NEVER seen a trim tag without the year of the make.
Now Fremont tags...I've been collecting those recently. We're trying to see how the engine casting date lines up with the Build date of the car for Fremont.
We have as quick as 3 weeks...and as long as 70 days...It's been interesting.

Another thing to note is that Fremont stopped using the RPO codes all together by the end of march...at least for Oldsmobile.
Not sure about the other brands that went down the line.
Old Aug 18, 2022 | 03:11 PM
  #11  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,802
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Rallye469
Thanks Joe...I've NEVER seen a trim tag without the year of the make.
I had not prior to this either, but I can't say that I've seen a lot of tags from KC cars either.

According to this Chevelle site, the Baltimore plant didn't start stamping the model year on the cowl tag until after the start of calendar 1964, in fact the whole tag blank was changed. These two tags are both from 1964 Chevelles. The first is a 12E date code, the second is 04D.



Old Aug 18, 2022 | 03:16 PM
  #12  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,802
From: Northern VA
And just to add to the confusion, here's a tag from a 1964 Chevelle from the KC plant, but the body was built in the Euclid, OH body plant (as designated by the EP) but slated for assembly at KC (the K after the paint code). Note that this car is an Oct 63 assembly and does have the model year, whereas the tag in the first post is a Dec 63 assembly and does not, but it doesn't have the EP code either.




Old Aug 18, 2022 | 03:22 PM
  #13  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,802
From: Northern VA
OK, jackpot. Here are several Chevelle tags from KC that apparently didn't come from Euclid. Note that these are all over the map.

The first has an unusual assembly date code of "D04", which allegedly means December 04, 1963. Note the lack of a model year on the style line.



This one from late December 1963 has the traditional 12D date code and still no model year.




And like Baltimore, this one from April 1964 has the model year and the different tag format.







Old Aug 19, 2022 | 09:09 AM
  #14  
Rallye469's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,664
From: Jacksonville, FL
Damn. KC was all over the place. Errors abound...

I also find it interesting that Chevy covered off on every variation imaginable with their body style #...even S.S.
Vs. Olds which had 8 styles? And zero trim levels?
I realize Chevy just had MORE body styles...but extra identification would have been nice for Olds.


Old Aug 19, 2022 | 09:39 AM
  #15  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,802
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Rallye469
Damn. KC was all over the place. Errors abound...

I also find it interesting that Chevy covered off on every variation imaginable with their body style #...even S.S.
Vs. Olds which had 8 styles? And zero trim levels?
I realize Chevy just had MORE body styles...but extra identification would have been nice for Olds.

Not that different from Olds. For the 1965 model year Chevy really only had four A-body model lines (Chevelle, Chevelle Deluxe, Malibu, and SS) to Oldsmobile's three (F85, F85 Deluxe, and Cutlass). The second digit of the model was odd for six cylinder or even for eight cylinder.

Chevelle 31xx, 32xx
Chevelle Deluxe 33xx, 34xx
Malibu 35xx, 36xx
SS 37xx, 38xx

F85 33xx, 34xx
F85 Deluxe 35xx, 36xx
Cutlass 38xx (there was no six cylinder option for the high-end Cutlass models)

Note that both Caminos and Vistas were assigned to one of the existing A-body model lines - 33xx, 34xx, 35xx, or 36xx for the ElCo and 34xx or 38xx for the Vista.

Body style numbers were common across all divisions.

Chevy offered seven unique body styles that year:
11 - two door sedan (this is a different roofline than the Olds Sport Coupe)
15 - two door wagon
35 - four door wagon
37 - two door hardtop
67 - convertible
69 - four door sedan
80 - pickup

Olds also offered seven (different) body styles that year:
27 - two door club/sport coupe
35 - four door wagon
37 - two door hardtop
55 - two row extended wagon (Vista)
66 - three row extended wagon
67 - convertible
69 - four door sedan
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rickw30
General Discussion
22
May 4, 2022 05:31 PM
over my head
General Discussion
5
Jul 20, 2021 02:51 PM
tt455
General Discussion
6
Jun 6, 2021 06:30 PM
chrisneu68olds
General Discussion
77
May 10, 2017 09:46 PM
CutlassLegend
General Discussion
13
Aug 9, 2011 05:11 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:02 AM.