'69 H/O Air Cleaner

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 21st, 2009, 10:57 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
grt05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 29
'69 H/O Air Cleaner

What is the rare part of the '69 H/O air cleaner? I believe it is the top part with the flapper, correct? Are the bottoms pieces the same for all 4-barrel '68-'72 air claners and the top makes it unique to the H/O?

Thanks,

Mike
grt05 is offline  
Old May 21st, 2009, 11:03 AM
  #2  
Moderator
 
Jamesbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 17,602
The top can is the rare biggie with the flapper door. They are being repoed for mega bucks. The bottom is the same with a slight variation of five holes drilled to allow water to escape.

Here's the low down.


http://members.***.net/witrob/scoop/scoop.html

The top can sits down into the bottom of the air cleaner.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Picture 131.jpg (107.1 KB, 175 views)
Jamesbo is offline  
Old May 21st, 2009, 11:34 AM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
grt05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 29
Thanks for the reply. Is the bottom piece easy to come by? I am looking through a few catalogs and I don't see where you can purchase the bottom piece.

Thanks,

Mike
grt05 is offline  
Old May 21st, 2009, 11:37 AM
  #4  
Moderator
 
Jamesbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 17,602
I don't recall seeing them in catalogs but I would call them rare. What are you trying to do. I may be able to help you.
Jamesbo is offline  
Old May 21st, 2009, 11:51 AM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
grt05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 29
Well I have the top flapper piece, but my bottom piece is pretty beat up. I was looking to buy one, but like I said the catalogs don't seem to list them.

I guess I have another questions about the flapper motor/actuator. Is that also a rare piece?

Thanks
grt05 is offline  
Old May 21st, 2009, 12:09 PM
  #6  
Moderator
 
Jamesbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 17,602
I believe I've got a handful of bottoms laying around pm me and I get ya one.
Jamesbo is offline  
Old May 23rd, 2009, 08:08 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
666 the legend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Philly
Posts: 99
..Isnt the FLAPPER PART a FORD Item......??
666 the legend is offline  
Old May 24th, 2009, 06:42 PM
  #8  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,259
Originally Posted by 666 the legend
..Isnt the FLAPPER PART a FORD Item......??
DEARBORN! They are Dearborn parts. Just like the HD three speed used in the 442s in some years...

Actually, the flapper door, stamped sheet metal that holds the flapper, and vacuum actuator are all Cobra Jet parts. My actuator even has a Ford logo on it.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old May 25th, 2009, 09:09 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
1969Hurst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Orland Park, IL
Posts: 522
Here's a picture I took while visiting Karl Sup a few years ago. He had come by a Cobra Jet air cleaner top.. As you can see the flapper portion is the same as the 69's. If you look at the 69 H/O's, the entire flapper area is sort of oval cut out and welded/attached to the circular upper portion.. as if Hurst/Demmer, somebody in making the 69 H/O's ordered a slew of Cobra Jet uppers and cut out the area to fabricate for the H/O's. Next to it is the 69 H/O top...



Originally Posted by joe_padavano
DEARBORN! They are Dearborn parts. Just like the HD three speed used in the 442s in some years...

Actually, the flapper door, stamped sheet metal that holds the flapper, and vacuum actuator are all Cobra Jet parts. My actuator even has a Ford logo on it.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
P4250105.jpg (75.4 KB, 179 views)
File Type: jpg
AirClnr_02.jpg (64.2 KB, 160 views)
1969Hurst is offline  
Old May 25th, 2009, 09:13 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
1969Hurst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Orland Park, IL
Posts: 522
Another item you may be aware of, the 1969 AMC Hurst Scrambler used the same parts. Attached below is a picture of the Scrambler and they incorporated the portion directly into the hood.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
P1010028.jpg (65.2 KB, 152 views)
1969Hurst is offline  
Old May 25th, 2009, 09:27 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
1969Hurst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Orland Park, IL
Posts: 522
Ok... one more item... I guess I should have fully thought through all of this and put it into one post ..

There is a place called Perogie Enterprises... www.perogie.com that deals in Ford performance parts. I've never dealt with them but if you scroll down to Performance and Specialty and click on the 428 CJ & SCJ you can scroll thru that and they offer the Ford Shaker Vacuum Diaphram New Repro & also a rebuilding service, I would imagine this could be the same peice as our vaccum piece.
1969Hurst is offline  
Old May 26th, 2009, 07:28 AM
  #12  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,259
Originally Posted by 1969Hurst
... as if Hurst/Demmer, somebody in making the 69 H/O's ordered a slew of Cobra Jet uppers and cut out the area to fabricate for the H/O's. Next to it is the 69 H/O top...
Well, from your two pictures, I'm thinking the oval stamping is unique to the H/O. Note that the CJ upper has two beads that run all the way to the upturned leading edge, whereas the H/O part is completely flat there.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old May 26th, 2009, 07:29 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
1969Hurst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Orland Park, IL
Posts: 522
Joe;

Yep, good eye... I've looked at that picture many times and didn't pay attention to the two indented beads...

Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Well, from your two pictures, I'm thinking the oval stamping is unique to the H/O. Note that the CJ upper has two beads that run all the way to the upturned leading edge, whereas the H/O part is completely flat there.
1969Hurst is offline  
Old November 26th, 2017, 08:42 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
stlbluesbrother's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 969
69 H/O Vacuum Actuator?

Hey guys,

Resurrecting a very old thread. I recently acquired this vacuum actuator and wanted to confirm it is correct for a '69 Hurst Olds air cleaner assembly.

Thanks,
Mike





stlbluesbrother is offline  
Old November 27th, 2017, 08:03 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
marxjunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: KANSAS CITY, KS
Posts: 2,030
70 -74 AMX used a top with the same flapper assy, i remember thinking how close i thought it was to the H/O..they are less expensive than H/O stuff too..not cheap, but less..theres an option

THE MACHINE REBEL for 70 uses the same flapper, but it attaches to the hood like a scrambler...ive had a few..the bring about 400 on ebay, its just the "bubble" and door with the vac motor


the vac motors have been repopped for some time for the AMXs...they all need them..so not hard to find..and work an all of the cars that use this type of flapper

the secret for AMC guys is, the 71-74 javelins with A/C use the same motor to operate a door inside the car to direct the air...you just "adjust" the plunger rod, its the same length etc..just bent a little diff..but is identical to the flapper door motor in appearance etc, and most come out looking NOS they are way under the dash...
marxjunk is offline  
Old January 2nd, 2018, 06:30 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
rr69ho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 355
Actually, the base IS NOT THE SAME in as it has 2 PVC hole provisions for each valve cover where the 442's only had the one on the pass. side.
Also, the originals did not have the drain holes in the base like the 70 - 72's unless someone put them in there afterwards.
rr69ho is offline  
Old January 3rd, 2018, 12:28 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
FStanley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 513
Originally Posted by rr69ho
Actually, the base IS NOT THE SAME in as it has 2 PVC hole provisions for each valve cover where the 442's only had the one on the pass. side.
Also, the originals did not have the drain holes in the base like the 70 - 72's unless someone put them in there afterwards.
You are correct about two holes for breathers, one off each valve cover.. unique to 69 HO. PCV was connected to rubber elbow connected to fitting in the intake maifold, then PVC, then small hose to carb PVC inlet Also there was 1 drain hole on the bottom originally, later a factory bulletin was issued to drill more holes out and where to drill them, because water got down the carb..
FStanley is offline  
Old January 4th, 2018, 06:00 AM
  #18  
Registered User
 
rr69ho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 355
Originally Posted by FStanley
Also there was 1 drain hole on the bottom originally, later a factory bulletin was issued to drill more holes out and where to drill them, because water got down the carb..

This was the initial start of water injection!!!
rr69ho is offline  
Old March 6th, 2018, 10:56 AM
  #19  
Registered User
 
firefrost gold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: mn
Posts: 2,444
Also the inlet on the air horn is larger than the standard
firefrost gold is offline  
Old May 7th, 2019, 05:29 AM
  #20  
Registered User
 
69HO43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,906
Originally Posted by firefrost gold
Also the inlet on the air horn is larger than the standard
I've heard that wives' tale for a long time, but have never seen the "larger" version on any H/O.
I haven't been around in quite a while, so I'm playing catch up. But here's my 69 H/O air cleaner I measured for the snorkel a few years ago. It was the same measurement for a 69 442 air cleaner I had. I also have a 70 W-30 air cleaner base somewhere that measured the same. Except the holes in the bottom are a tad larger and more numerous.



69HO43 is online now  
Old June 7th, 2019, 04:10 AM
  #21  
Registered User
 
firefrost gold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: mn
Posts: 2,444
That is correct the deltas had the smaller tubes but still painted the same .
firefrost gold is offline  
Old October 8th, 2019, 11:50 AM
  #22  
Olds Fanatic
 
69 Hurst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Cartersville, GA
Posts: 645
Does anyone know the correct red to re-finish the base assembly??

Thanks.
69 Hurst is offline  
Old October 8th, 2019, 03:16 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
Yellowstatue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Too close to Toronto!!
Posts: 4,087
There is a Fod red that is supposed to be very close.
Yellowstatue is offline  
Old October 8th, 2019, 04:05 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
69HO43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,906
Supercars Unlimited used to have a nice color. However, I just checked their website said it's discontinued. Fusick is the other one. I've heard good about both. Some claim the Fusick is too orange-y, but I'm ok with it.

Fusick is pretty much your best bet. Unless you can get someone with an original paint air cleaner take it to get scanned and get some custom mixed. I have no idea what the formulation is. Would be nice to get the right codes.

I did mine with the Fusick stuff and I think it matched the original fairly well. Issues I see with everything is that batches of the original paint varied slightly from batch to batch, the age of original paint, plus the variance in the new paint batches.

If you have a 69 H/O, unless you're going for 1000 points, if you use the Fusick paint, you'll be fine. As long as there is some contrast of orange to the red engine, everything will be great.

Here's some pics of mine using the Fusick's blend. Mine never had the bulletin performed on it so it still just has a single drain hole.




69HO43 is online now  
Old October 8th, 2019, 07:51 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
ben442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ontario
Posts: 336
I have the code for this paint but not sure if the 68 and 69 red are the same.
ben442 is offline  
Old October 9th, 2019, 03:48 AM
  #26  
Registered User
 
69HO43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,906
Originally Posted by ben442
I have the code for this paint but not sure if the 68 and 69 red are the same.
AFAIK, the 68 and 69 red air cleaners are the same color. So what code is it?
69HO43 is online now  
Old October 9th, 2019, 05:07 AM
  #27  
Registered User
 
ben442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ontario
Posts: 336
Here is the custom mix I had made to match. My apologies, I should have said I have a color mix rather than code.

ben442 is offline  
Old October 9th, 2019, 11:32 AM
  #28  
Registered User
 
69HO43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,906
Just as good. Thanks. That could help out some folks needing it.
69HO43 is online now  
Old October 9th, 2019, 02:41 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
Yellowstatue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Too close to Toronto!!
Posts: 4,087
I have an original '68 442 red air cleaner housing. Was on a car for only two weeks. On a shelf for several years after that. Then I bought it and it was used at shows and then wrapped in a protective cover in the trunk when not in use...so if I get it scanned, what do I do with that info? Post it here?
Yellowstatue is offline  
Old October 9th, 2019, 03:44 PM
  #30  
Registered User
 
69HO43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,906
Originally Posted by Yellowstatue
I have an original '68 442 red air cleaner housing. Was on a car for only two weeks. On a shelf for several years after that. Then I bought it and it was used at shows and then wrapped in a protective cover in the trunk when not in use...so if I get it scanned, what do I do with that info? Post it here?
Why, of course! Can never hurt. Obviously it's up to you along your time lines. Helping out the Olds community has its virtues. Nothing can beat original, but if Fusick's is the only game in town, some of the more industrious souls love to paint things through a gun.

When I had them scan a bumper one time on a 93 Camaro to ensure I got a good match, they printed me out a sheet with the mix formulation on it. If you can get that, just take a picture of it and post it up here! That would be great.
69HO43 is online now  
Old October 9th, 2019, 05:32 PM
  #31  
Registered User
 
Yellowstatue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Too close to Toronto!!
Posts: 4,087
OK...I'll hop right to it!
Yellowstatue is offline  
Old November 12th, 2019, 02:23 AM
  #32  
Registered User
 
briane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 735
Following this old thread,are the H/O and Cobra Jet vacuum motors identical, or is there some difference?
briane is offline  
Old November 12th, 2019, 05:44 AM
  #33  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,259
Originally Posted by briane
Following this old thread,are the H/O and Cobra Jet vacuum motors identical, or is there some difference?
From post #8 (and a decade ago):

Originally Posted by joe_padavano
My actuator even has a Ford logo on it.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old November 12th, 2019, 09:20 AM
  #34  
Registered User
 
69HO43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,906
I've got one with a ford logo with a date stamped on it too. Dated 2/69, IIRC. I'd have to look at that again. My car was built in 3/69 and converted 4/1, so it works for me.
69HO43 is online now  
Old November 12th, 2019, 04:20 PM
  #35  
Registered User
 
briane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 735
Thanks for the responses. What I was hoping to confirm, did Demer use the Ford part as received or was it modified in some manner. I read someplace about an alteration but I don't know if that is correct.
briane is offline  
Old November 12th, 2019, 05:27 PM
  #36  
Registered User
 
69HO43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,906
AFAIK, the correct vacuum motor is a straight up ford piece, unmodified. It is not from a shaker hood scoop. Easy to tell, those shaker styles have a LONG vacuum hose metal tube on them. But basically the same pod. There also was another type after April of 69 for the Mustang that has 4 bends in the rod. The H/O and earlier mustangs used the one with the 3 bends and short vacuum hose tube.

The Ford p/n is C9ZZ-9D612-A.

Be careful, the shaker one with the LONG tube is the same part number except it's a B. It'll work, you would just have to cut the tube down.

The C9ZZ-9D612-A looks like this:

69HO43 is online now  
Old November 12th, 2019, 06:11 PM
  #37  
Registered User
 
briane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 735
Thanks, very helpful. I just bought a '69 from a local friend. He's the third owner, had it 25 years. Now I have a lot of details to learn!
briane is offline  
Old November 13th, 2019, 04:18 AM
  #38  
Registered User
 
scrappie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: eastern MA
Posts: 3,287
Sorry Im not up on latest acronyms but what does AFAIK mean?
scrappie is offline  
Old November 13th, 2019, 04:35 AM
  #39  
Registered User
 
69HO43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,906
Originally Posted by briane
Thanks, very helpful. I just bought a '69 from a local friend. He's the third owner, had it 25 years. Now I have a lot of details to learn!
As you can tell from these discussions, there are still anomalies and oddities that are yet to be fully explained about these cars, or any other model as well. One thing I did learn from Kurt Karch recently is that the correct battery is an R71 and the battery tray is bigger than any other tray installed in a 442 to accommodate that big bastage of a battery. About a foot long. R59s work, but R71 is the correct one. According to Kurt, there was some recently found documentation for this. Probably the biggest issue is that if your battery tray corroded and gets replaced, dime to donuts it probably was replaced with the smaller one.

Perhaps the biggest thing that every 69 H/O owner finds out at minimum is that no 2 cars were converted exactly alike. And VIN number and Demmer assigned number means nothing to each other. Demmer Car #1 has a higher VIN than Demmer Cars #5, #37, and #38. Go figure.

You may have a Demmer assigned sequence number for your car. 553 cars have been verified by some sort of Demmer paperwork.

Is your car on the list?

http://hurstolds.oldsgmail.com/69hovin.htm

If you're lucky enough to find original cars to look at, some have gold overspray in places that probably shouldn't like on the chrome pieces, etc. The paint scheme is the one that's usually varies the most between the cars since seemingly a wide artistic license was given when painting the stripes (Think production over quality). Hood scoop alignment is another as some are a hair off center than others.

You'll be learning a lot about your car. If you got a service manual, body manual, and a PIM, aka, Assembly Manual, you are already miles ahead. If not, at least get those, and if you need specifics on your own car, contact Kurt Karch from the H/OCA. He lives and breathes 69 H/Os and may even have a copy of Demmer conversion paperwork for your car if you don't already have it. He doesn't have all of the cars, and the amount of paperwork varies from what he does have, but he can help you out big time.

69HO43 is online now  
Old November 13th, 2019, 04:37 AM
  #40  
Registered User
 
69HO43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,906
Originally Posted by scrappie
Sorry Im not up on latest acronyms but what does AFAIK mean?
As far as I know.
69HO43 is online now  


Quick Reply: '69 H/O Air Cleaner



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:00 AM.