General Questions Place to post your questions that don't fit into one of the specific forums below.

Viscus Fan question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 3rd, 2016 | 11:32 AM
  #1  
442fanatic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 332
From: Farnhamville, Iowa
Viscus Fan question

Still battling the overheating issue on my car.

Back information: 76 cutlass 442, originally had 350 engine.
3.42 rear end, auto

Put in a built 455, nothing monster but better than stock.

Still using original 3 core radiator. Put in a 195 thermastat, runs 210.

I have since decided the old radiator isn't cutting it and have since ordered a new AL radiator out of Summit SUM-380457.

I got home from a 40 mile cruise last night popped the hood, and tried turning the radiator fan, it turned with a tad bit of resistance. Shouldn't the fan be locked since the thermo clutch is hot? And release and turn freely when cool by running down the road or after sitting over night and lock in when hot?

https://www.opgi.com/cutlass/1976/co...ing/fans/FC57/

This is the type of fan clutch I put on new a few years ago when I finished up the engine build...
Old May 3rd, 2016 | 01:06 PM
  #2  
Fun71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 14,849
From: Phoenix, AZ
No, the fan will not lock solidly, it will just get more difficult to turn. The fan clutch provides a viscous coupling between the water pump shaft and the fan, kind of like a torque converter on an automatic transmission. If yours doesn't have significant resistance when hot, it may be faulty.

Also, after sitting overnight the fan will be hard to turn because the silicone fluid has drained from the reservoir into the working area.

http://www.haydenauto.com/upload/Hay...n-clutches.pdf
A thermal fan clutch is engaged on a cold startup because the fluid drains into the
working area when the engine is shut off. The fan clutch will slow down shortly after
startup as a result of a pumping action produced by a difference
in speed between the shaft and the body of the clutch.
Old May 3rd, 2016 | 01:39 PM
  #3  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 41,167
From: Poteau, Ok
210 is not overheating with a 195 thermostat.
Old May 3rd, 2016 | 08:28 PM
  #4  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by oldcutlass
210 is not overheating with a 195 thermostat.
I agree, but I would modify that to say that with a conservative 10% +/- margin of error for a mass market non-scientific thermometer, at about 190° your actual temperature could be anywhere from 175° to 215°.

- Eric
Old May 4th, 2016 | 10:42 AM
  #5  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 41,167
From: Poteau, Ok
Which is still not an issue with that thermostat.
Old May 4th, 2016 | 11:14 AM
  #6  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
My point exactly: It could not be a "problem" at all. The thermostat could be opening and closing at exactly the right temperature, but the gauge is not a calibrated scientific instrument.

Your observations are only as accurate as your equipment is.

- Eric
Old May 4th, 2016 | 11:41 AM
  #7  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 41,167
From: Poteau, Ok
Very true. Not to say this applies to the op, but sometimes people install gauges in their car and realize in traffic that temps start to climb. The temps can reach 215-220 and then drop as the car starts to move back up to speed. This is normal.
Old May 4th, 2016 | 11:56 AM
  #8  
droldsmorland's Avatar
CH3NO2 LEARN IT BURN IT
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,044
From: Land of Taxes
Pay attention to the T-Stat too...Be aware they are not all created equal. Steer clear of offshore junk. There is standard and heavy duty T-Stats as well as specialty aftermarket stats. I use the Stant HD equivalent of the standard recommended PN for Olds. It touts better regulation ... less hysteresis...or less dips & spikes for better control. The Robertshaw design is supposed to be good. Bottom line is it doesnt sound like you have a problem.
Old May 5th, 2016 | 09:35 AM
  #9  
442fanatic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 332
From: Farnhamville, Iowa
Thank you for the input guys ! I wondered what the +/- would be over the rating n the thermostat.
I am concerned though that the factory three core behind the original 350 smogger won't cut it for a heated up 455 in midwestern summers with the a/c blowing.

Have a Summit AL replacement radiator, crossflow with 1" tubes arriving today to install.
For the midwest guys Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, Illinois, etc.. what temp of T-stat have you guys used with a/c cars, out of curiosity.
Old May 5th, 2016 | 09:40 AM
  #10  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by 442fanatic
I wondered what the +/- would be over the rating n the thermostat.
Just to be clear, I don't know the exact tolerance of a standard automotive temperature gauge or thermostat, but 10% does not not sound out of line for a standard consumer product. If you went to 5%, you'd still have 10° leeway either way.

- Eric
Old May 6th, 2016 | 01:51 PM
  #11  
442fanatic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 332
From: Farnhamville, Iowa
Well guys, i worked late after work on my car. Installed the new aluminum radiator from Summit Racing, Put in a 180 degree thermostat, and new premixed coolant we sell at our Deere Dealership, and she is running like a champ. Temps lower and holding with the larger radiator.
next on tap, recharging the a/c and finding where it leaked over the winter.
Old May 6th, 2016 | 02:56 PM
  #12  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Excellent!

- Eric
Old May 17th, 2016 | 10:00 AM
  #13  
442fanatic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 332
From: Farnhamville, Iowa
Update, cooling issue controlled. Transmission is still leaking. Not from the pan...
just some back history, had the transmission rebuilt in 2011. Put in the car and sat until car went to the body shop in 2/2014. Car back in 12/2015. Snafu happened on transmission, original shop pulled and rebuilt.
However the front pump seal, not shaft seal, is leaking after driving the car... I am greatly regretting not having just bought a rebuilt and tested transmission.

I may have an intake leak now to on the back of the intake, going to look around on the brake booster hose first before anything drastic... But will wait until the trans shop will pull the trans again, and see what is up with that pump seal.... ugh... It is mid May !!!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
convertible 63
The Clubhouse
17
May 9th, 2018 06:10 AM
rmoths
Small Blocks
25
December 21st, 2013 11:03 AM
KZ442
Parts Wanted
2
November 9th, 2010 05:01 AM
agtw31
Small Blocks
8
June 23rd, 2009 01:39 PM
esisson
Big Blocks
12
May 20th, 2008 12:09 PM



Quick Reply: Viscus Fan question



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:28 PM.